I wonder how they deal with the high angle of attack on landing?

Please tell me that demonstrator half scale. From the looks of it, there's only room in the cockpit for a single pilot, in a fighter jet stile position, which means ingress and egress would have to be via a raisable canopy. Same goes for the passengers too. While that may be fine for the pilot, it looks incredibly claustrophobic for the passengers. Not to mention, no inflight service or bathroom breaks.

Good name: Boom. I guess there is still the same problem: Boom.

To MemoriaTechnica
If you read the text again you should see that this a one third scale model.

Yawn. Talk is cheap. Doesn’t appear any real new benchmarks have been met.

I'm not an aerospace engineer, but something about the square engine boxes bothers me. Seems like a heavily rounded triangular shape would work better. You would get a somewhat flat surface to mate with the wing, and you could put a generous radius on the circumference of the air inlet. The intake turbulence from those corners must be incredible.

There can be only one engine manufacturer for this small market. You have Boom, Aerion and maybe another. Only one will make it.

Another toy for the T-Men.

Another toy for the wealthy as the rest of humanity is allowed to rot. And are we in such a hurry we need to use the much greater increased energy it takes to taken anything supersonic?

@MemoriaTechnica: You can see here: https://newatlas.com/boom-xb-1-prototype/46452/ that the prototype is just a 2-seater, fighter-jet style.

Looks like they're going to try things out on the smaller craft, and then scale them up.