Steve Hines
Lowest price Tacoma starts out at $26400.00 That's $10000.00 less than the Alpha. This is the problem with EV's. They cost too much for the vast majority of potential consumers. Maybe Uncle Joe's incentives will make em competitive in price.
ElectroDyne
And the Chevy Colorado starts at $26395 (before incentives) for an extended cab 2WD. Also $10K less than the Alpha, like the Tacoma that Steve Hines pointed out. In fact, $36K (the starting price for the Alpha) gets you into a 4-door 4x4 WT with money left to spare (again before incentives).
Spud Murphy
Funny how the two commenters here are comparing a niche retro vehicle to regular mass produced vehicles, they have different target markets. Then consider that while EVs are more expensive to start with, their running and maintenance costs are vastly less, especially if you already have solar. It's not all about up-front cost, it's about TCO, and for business owners, having a vehicle that isn't off the road regularly for servicing adds even more value to EVs.
Unsold
I haven't seen a wheel to body ratio like that since HotWheels... lol.
fluke meter
@Spud - I believe the two posters you are complaining about were mainly reacting to the authors statement : "... That's less than one would pay for the lowest-end Tacoma or Colorado for sure. " Since in fact those two trucks start $10k less or 1/3 - that's a note worthy fact for readers..
Bruce H. Anderson
Let me chime in about the "bigger is better" ethos plaguing the SUV market. I parked my old 93 Suburban (same basic size as a pickup of the era) amid a row of more recent model pickups and took a picture. The difference is astounding.
More load capacity? No.
More passenger room? No.
Better gas mileage? No.
Larger frontal area? Oh yes! What an embarrassment.
Regarding TCO, there is the battery pack replacement to consider because it will decrease in performance over time (all batteries do that) and need replacement. My 93 had turned over 365K when I sold it to my mechanic. Original engine, still running like a top to this day.
DavidB
This truck really appeals to me, especially including the big wheel-to-body height ratio. (Big vehicles on tiny wheels look like overweight pugs—blech.)

I’d absolutely consider one of these, if it makes it to production with those specs!

Gregg Eshelman
They'll need a rear drive only option, not a front drive only option. People wanting to get a base model one without all the fancy stuff will want rear drive only to handle loads better.

Thanks to the "chicken tax" tariff bill putting a 25% import duty on light trucks, we haven't have pickups this size in the USA for many years. Initially, manufacturers were able to work around it by importing the Isuzu LUV / Chevy P'UP, Mazda and Ford Courier, Dodge and Mitsubishi D-50 and Plymouth Arrow trucks with the beds not installed as "parts". The Subaru Brat squeaked by as a "passenger vehicle" by having the two seats welded into the bed.

But those loopholes were closed and the little trucks were replaced by American or Canadian built larger trucks like the S10/S15, Ranger, and Dakota. Subaru, when they wanted to bring back something similar to the old Brat, had to make it a 4 door + open bed to make it "not a light truck" subject to the 25% tariff.

Ford imports their Turkey built Transit Connect vans with rear interior finish, seats, and windows. Then unless specially ordered with all that, they remove it all and replace the rear side and door windows with solid panels. They come into the USA as passenger vehicles and most leave Ford's hands as light trucks.

Today all that remains in force of the "chicken tax" bill is the 25% import tariff on light trucks. It did nothing to spur manufacturers to build the small trucks here, despite the market demand.

Since the imports were stopped, those little trucks have held their value. People will buy a rusted out hulk of a Courier, LUV or P'UP and restore it. I dunno about the Mitsubisi/Mopar ones.
Adrian Akau
Am interested in purchasing this size truck with internal combustion engine. The trucks today are getting too big.
Pablo
I used to drive small trucks, 3 D-50s, and an S-10, followed by a handful of Rangers. The reality for me was that my Ecoboost F150 is far and away the best truck I’ve owned. Yes, it has a Nimitz Class turning radius, to borrow a phrase from Jeremy Clarkson, but it averages 3mpg better than my last Ranger and I can tow a 30’ camper across the country and back at 75 if I please. I’ll start getting interested in an electric truck when it has my 800 mile (ok, not towing...) range, and I can expect to get 250k out of it before spending serious money on repairs.