phydeaux August 25, 2011 12:18 AM

US$5,500 - holy crap.
Not a good value by any stretch.

Slowburn August 25, 2011 05:29 AM

The Titanium frame bike I tried was too flexible, I\'ll take the weight penalty of a good high-alloy steel frame.

Renārs Grebežs August 25, 2011 05:51 AM

Yeah, what\'s with these ridiculous prices?

Guy Macher August 25, 2011 12:17 PM

Really clean design. No stupid suspension (beyond pneumatic tires, of course). In steel, it would be just as beautiful, nearly as light, and affordable!

wle August 25, 2011 02:23 PM

$5500 is a lot to pay for \'clean lines\'
i;ll take \'traditional\' steel or aluminum, leftover $4500 on the side , please!
wle

Alan Mudd August 25, 2011 02:52 PM

I agree with the other posters that this would have made a lot more sense in steel, but then we wouldn\'t have been reading about it on gizmag, would we?

cazin678 August 25, 2011 03:21 PM

@Macher- no, it wouldn\'t......

Muraculous August 25, 2011 03:28 PM

Nice design and execution but wildly expensive (unless you are one of those oil traders or stock brokers who don\'t care where the market goes as long as you are booking transactions).

Justin Schetrompf August 25, 2011 04:15 PM

Art isn\'t priced for the masses now is it, That\'s what makes the difference, steel is real true, but Titanium last longer than average marriage. BTW buying one of these artfully crafted ride may just cause a few.

Walt Stawicki August 25, 2011 04:52 PM

IAnd I worry about bringing a family capable trike to market at $5K???!!?