I\\\'m not a fan of 4 door sedans but if I was this one would be it! They did a nice job of refining it and making it look good to me. :-)

Looks pretty much like what they\'ve been producing for Dodge. Doesn\'t seem terribly creative and, to me, lacks a sense of style. So many of these vehicles seem to look like armoured vehicles.

it\'s been lancia\'d a bit.if you\'ve seen the latest lancia models you\'ll see a resemlance.some italian design hands involved in this facelift and thats not a bad thing.now if they\'d slap a v12 ferrari in there and use carbon fiber body panels they\'d leave caddy with its tongue hanging out.

Any automaker (or home builder for that matter) can slap a body on a platform. The level and sophistication of integration of form and function is the differentiator - especially in the upper mid-class market.
Additional items might be: connectivity, fuel choices, turbine/fuel-cell hybrid-drive, Infra-red/sonar/camera low-visibility assist and composite simulated vision, transparent TFT windshield with configurable heads-up icons for all functions, and a few more that are slowly making their way to the market.

I\'m still in love with the Cadillac CTS-V, but this is a VERY nice-looking vehicle inside and out! It\'s also adding a few safety features like bling spot monitoring that it and the Ford Taurus SHO have that the Cadillac doesn\'t.

\"The windshield on the 2011 Chrysler 300 sedan has been raked back 3 inches for improved aerodynamics..\"

It seems to me that the vehicle needs much more improvement in aerodynamics. It also looks rather heavy. If a better Cd design was implemented, lighter materials and smaller engine were used, I am sure that the image of Chrysler being a luxury vehicle could be upheld.

Sloping of the front a bit more in the hood section and tapering the sides in the back just a bit might help.

Why is this even in Gizmag? It is just another gasoline guzzling vehicle with a bunch of bells and whistles added. \"and gets fuel economy of up to 25 mpg on the highway\" Oooh impressive. What are you kidding me? I have a 19 year old VW that gets 34 mph!

So ugly. This model is maybe attempt to take police\'s and emergency\'s cars market, like Crown Victoria. Sorrry for my english....I know.

Todd, Jerome, spot on,, my first though was it is butt ugly, then why have all that \"fancy digital display stuff\" and an ANALOGUE clock???,,, seems like hooey to me the wagon looked ok on the last generation

Make it a 2-door, and while you\'re at it [s]Chrysler[/s] Fiat, make a 2-door Charger! I can see having a 4-door 300 since some years in that model\'s past there were 4-door sedans, but the Charger is supposed to be a muscle car, a sporty car, which does not, should not ever include four doors. It was bad enough when the original revival of the 300 was a 4-door, but adding to the awful it was front drive. At least MoPar corrected *that* mistake.
I\'m surprised they didn\'t make a 4-door Challenger too.
Since they own all the old Hudson, Nash, American Motors trademarks, I\'d like to see the Hudson name revived on a 2-door coupe built in this RWD platform. It\'s nearly the same dimensions as the 1950\'s Hudson short wheelbase models. (Pacemaker and Wasp.) A bit shorter in height but around 1,000 pounds *heavier* than the Hudsons.
Make a new Hornet and get it into racing, push NASCAR back into REAL CARS instead of the tube framed baloney where they\'re all identical. There are many racing classes in other countries where they have to build the cars starting with a real car and the different makes really are different. It\'s especially entertaining in the classes where FWD, RWD and AWD cars compete in the same weight and engine size class.
NASCAR would gain a lot by going back to the STRICTLY STOCK it used to be over 50 years ago.