Slowburn August 12, 2014 04:50 AM I can see the value in it if it is a cheaper way to capture C02 for use. But it is not going to do anything about global warming because it is not caused buy C02. Fretting Freddy the Ferret pressing the Fret August 12, 2014 12:29 PM No, it is indeed not caused by C02, but by CO2. :)If you want to see the greenhouse effect in action, look at Venus or Mars (or the lack of for the latter). Stephen N Russell August 12, 2014 12:35 PM test in China, Mexico City & LA CA alone Awesome Michiel Mitchell August 12, 2014 12:56 PM now if they could trap Methane in this fashion... Expanded Viewpoint August 12, 2014 01:29 PM And I've not heard or read of even ONE actual experiment being done to try to replicate what supposedly happens to CFCs in the upper atmosphere either!. No one that I have hear of has built a small test chamber and put some R12 in it, and then made the gas dissociate by exposing it to UV light. From what I know, it's ALL conjecture and suppositions that Chlorine gas interferes with the formation of Ozone. I read one report where some gal made a HUGE jump from one or two facts to an unconnected conclusion! Talk about a kangaroo court! We need real science being done on these subjects, not a bunch of voodoo incantations and piercing screams. And has anyone put a radiometer or some other kind of IR detector in a test cell to see if CO2 actually blocks IR radiation? If I didn't have to be so concerned with putting food on our table, I'd buy some hardware and make some tests on my own!Randy Slowburn August 13, 2014 01:19 AM @ Fretting Freddy I've dated myself I learned to type on a typewriter and use the zero key for the uppercase oh. Venus, Mars, and lets add Jupiter as all three showed warming from the late 1970s to the late 1990s like it was caused by the sun especially sense as far as we can tell the heating was exactly proportional to the Earths warming. @ Expanded Viewpoint C02 does absorb some frequencies of infrared light but the first 200ppm in the atmosphere absorb over 90% of all the energy that C02 can absorb making the energy absorbed by the increased C02 levels statistically meaningless. Foiled August 13, 2014 11:47 AM @Slowburn Yes, heating is caused by the sun, but the earth usually reflected a lot of that heat back into the universe. Unfortunately mankind has now pumped so many greenhouse gasses, Co2 being one of them, out into the atmosphere, that it now traps a great deal of the reflected heat. This is the reason for the name Greenhouse gas, this is how climate change has been made by mankind, and this is what the scientists used to call global warming, until nabtards like the right wing US politicians, the coal industry and Fox networks retarded that word... And muddled the whole subject.Atmospheric Co2 is a cause for heat retention of the earth, and mankind is the reason for an incredible increase in atmospheric Co2.I'm saying this, because you seem to suggest that climate change is caused solely by the sun, and I do hope you realize that saying that, is a talking point of said right wingers, and it's only about 3% of the worlds scientists that do agree to this, so no contention in the world of academia, since those 3% are largely payed by the coal industry. Besides their data has been proven wrong. Rann Xeroxx August 14, 2014 11:34 AM CO2 before the 20th century was a trace gas making up less than a percentage of a percent of the total air composition. After the 20th century CO2 is a trace gas making up less than a percentage of a percent of the total air composition. In other words, it was insignificant before and it is still insignificant today.Man made CO2 has increased exponentially in the last 17 years while during that same time global warming has paused and actually decreased a bit. If you plot CO2 against the global temperature variation, its a very very poor correlation. What does correlate very well with global temp variation is solar fluctuations of activity. People who study the Sun and not CO2, they are predicting a good chance of global cooling such as a mini ice age.As far as "extreme weather", droughts, flooding, hurricanes, etc? All of those are actually statistically in decline. Slowburn August 15, 2014 12:25 PM @ Foiled If it is added green house gasses causing the heating why do Venus, Mars, and Jupiter show heating proportionally identical to earth. That 97% of scientists number you referred to is a lie as well. moreover August 15, 2014 02:57 PM An excellent resource for evaluating claims about Climate Change and Global Warming is http://skepticalscience.com They address and keep current reasoned, science based responses to specific denialist claims (like the Venus comparison, the sun's impact or historical correlations) and provide references to key papers. Spending an hour or two reading up on just some of those should convince most anyone not bound by ideology that the evidence for man made climate change is simply overwhelming. One manifestation of that is that denialists have almost no scientific papers to back up their positions. The other side has massive data and analyses from many different sources, disciplines, and countries that essentially come to the same global conclusions.