looks flimsy, as you see when he puts weight on the frame in the video.
could be wrong .. so keep up the good work, it's interesting to see it develop.
Island Architect
WOW!! The Baboon's arse motif carried to the extreme! well congratulations.
Bruce H. Anderson
This wonderful technology only affects the frame. Everything else would be standard manufacturing methods, one would assume. If there are significant weight reductions possible it might make it. Since body panels need to be attached to this space frame, and since in some cars these panels are structural members, it will be interesting to see how this plays out.
Daishi
From one of the photo captions: "The start-up estimates a 0 to 60 mph time of two seconds" 3D-printed, better power to weight ratio than the One:1, and a 2 second 0-60 time? Those claims come in a little too extraordinary to be believable but I'm sure it's millions of dollars of someone else's money he will use to try to prove them.
Don Duncan
Such low weight claimed. I find it hard to believe. However, even lower weight could be achieved with a different body design, e.g., the Aptera. In addition, much lower drag. If Aptera has a patent for this, it is still usable if the product is not sold.
NiltonsKunihoshi
Dream, incredible.
Stephen N Russell
Lisc & mass produce, awesome, save on car costs alone right.
mach37
Writers, as well as manufacturers, have got to understand that using a few 3D printed individual components does not qualify a finished complex product such as an automobile to be called "3D printed."
JimThetwo
if I had a 3D printed dental inlay fitted, would I then qualify as a 3D printed human?