that looks like a fantastic way to lose half your teeth.

Lightweight, fast enough, innovative: good luck to this new company !

Hate to be negative, but... Fail.

Senseless. You will get really wet, it\'s slow, you won\'t see a thing. Everyone who has ever rode a jet ski knows that you will have loosed your teeth not even cracked 20 mph. Watch the video and see how \"fast \"they are. It\'s really nice looking. Btw. why don\'t they make ist submerge able? Would be really nice for divers.

I can see only one use for this... lifeguards for some really expensive hotel. Otherwise I have to agree with M.T. above... Fail.........

1. This position has been tried in experimental aircraft, e.g. the Gloster Meteor, the Northrop XP-79B, etc. and always rejected because it\'s too tough on the pilot. 2. Jetskiing jolts your neck and back. Even at the Exo\'s low speeds, the jolts would severely stress a rider\'s neck. The human neck is not designed to take hard lateral jolts. Worse, the Exo rider can slide forward and hit his or her face on the raised ridge at the rear of the front hood. 3. Peripheral vision is very important for jetskiiers because they must avoid larger, faster boats, but a prone rider is too low to see very far, and can\'t look to the sides or behind very well. In fact the entire craft is too low to be seen from a distance by other watercraft operators, especially on rough water. 4. It is too low to handle anything but flat water, and would bury its nose in a wake or swell.. 4. In order to absorb shocks, a jet ski rider should stand, sit upright or recline. Go to plan B, mes amis.

Looks like a displacement hull?

looks as if its hard to handle, but if not and you are really really drunk it would be hard to fall off of .. wee

Boorrrring!
Show it in some waves!

hitting some choppy water would hurt the nuts... just saying...