Chris Reynolds
The touchscreen is probably the most important differentiating factor, but you barely mention it. You even imply that the touchscreen is a feature that only partly makes up for the subpar trackpad on the Surface's optional keyboard accessory with the statement, "Fortunately, it has a touchscreen to lessen the blow".
I use my Surface RT on my lap nearly every night with the type cover. My laptop is better for this, but it's not bad enough for me to reach for my laptop. It's on the level of saying the iPad has a visually better display than the Surface, since it's nearly imperceptible to the naked eye and definitely imperceptible with normal use, since you have to zoom in on text at max zoom to see even the slightest difference.
Stephen Liu
Wow, finally a review that makes sense. Thank you sir, for seeing it as it is. Why people even bother comparing this to an ipad I don't even...
AlfieJr
"It fares better as a laptop, but it also has big sacrifices ... like the fact that you can’t use it on your lap ..."
um ... does anyone notice the problem here? like maybe not being able to actually use a laptop literally on your lap might be a TOTAL FAIL!?
but by all means, let's make excuses! lots of them apparently. the more excuses it needs that you can think of, the better the Pro must be.
of course the other possibility is that the Pro is a fundamentally misbegotten MS concept that will be a DOA big flop. but we're not going there!
Harvey Lubin
Will Shanklin, although your comparison is technically accurate for the most part, it omits one important item.
People will not be buying the Surface Pro if they only intend to run Metro apps. They will pay more than the Surface RT, and live with the extra weight & thickness, and much shorter battery life because they want to use Windows 7 desktop apps...
But to use those Windows 7 desktop apps, the $120-$130 keyboard/trackpad cover is a necessity, not an option (even though Microsoft is selling it that way to reduce the over all price).
The reason that the keyboard/trackpad cover is a necessity, is because all of those Windows 7 desktop apps have not been designed for use on a tablet, and they do not use multi-touch gestures to operate. Windows 7 desktop apps use a cursor (accurately operated by a mouse or trackpad), much smaller UI elements than you find in tablet operating systems, and a menu and windows interface which again are designed to be accurately operated by a mouse or trackpad.
For example, there is a special (less powerful) version of Photoshop that has been designed specifically for multi-touch iOS and Android tablets. But if you tried to use the desktop version of Photoshop on a 10" display using only your fingers you would find it possible, but a VERY frustrating experience to do!
For this reason, the necessary keyboard/trackpad cover (or similar keyboard combinations from other vendors) should be considered to be included in the over all specs for the Surface Pro.
The keyboard covers add up to 6 millimetres (0.24 in) to the thickness of the Surface Pro, and an extra half pound (218 grams) to the Surface Pro.
This makes the over all thickness and weight much MORE than the MacBook Air!
You also get much more storage on the 64GB and 128 GB MacBook Air than you do on the Surface Pro. For example, the 64GB SUrface Pro has only 23GB of available space for the user. But the 64GB MacBook Air has about 56GB of available space for the user... that is over 250% of the usable storage in the 64GB Surface Pro!!!
Other differences between the two include:
- The Surface Pro display can only be set at one angle (which may not be optimal for the user), while the MacBook Air display is adjustable to any useable angle.
- The MacBook Air has a real, full-sized, backlit keyboard and a large glass multi-touch trackpad. The Surface Pro keyboard cover does not have real keys, is not full-sized, is not backlit for use in the dark, and does not have a glass trackpad.
- The MacBook Air is a laptop that you can actually use on your lap when there is no table available. The Surface Pro's keyboard cover is flexible and can't be used on your lap or other non-flat surface.
- The Surface Pro with the necessary keyboard cover is much more expensive than the 11.6" MacBook Air.
- The 11.6" MacBook Air has a tested battery life of over 5 hours (over 7 hours for the 13" model). But the Surface Pro has a tested battery life of only 4 hours, 14 minutes (See review by PCMag).
This additional information should (and would) be taken into consideration when comparing these two computers.
exodous
This is only the first release, maybe they'll get better with subsequent releases? If this fails I think MS might just dump it though and go all the way back to the drawing board. They've had too many failures in the past 10 years, but I hope they don't give up on this.
Jack Chan
AlfieJr Bro, there is a kickstand that can still fit on your lap. The arguments can go both ways because both devices have significantly different design. In contrast, you can also argue MacBook Air not being able to be used as a Tablet, or even not able to be used with the screen lay flat on your lap. But, not being able to adjust angle is a bummer though, I will give you that.
Harvey Type cover is .48 lb and touch cover is .46lb. So adding either one you get about 2.48 pound of weight, compared to 2.38 MacBook Air. So a Surface pro is optionally heavier only by 1 lb max compared to MacBook air. Thickness is definitely higher for a Type Cover (6mm) vs Touch Cover (3mm). With a Type Cover you have about 3 mm thicker but a Touch Cover will give you the same thickness as a MacBook Air.
And you keep using "much more" in the wrong sense. How is .10 pound much more? And how is 20-30 bucks much more for a device that is costing you 1k anyway? (Surface Pro 899 + Type Cover 130 => 1029) You are only taking the negative components out from Surface Pro and say whatever that fits your argument better (i.e. you mentioned 6 mm keyboard, which is clearly the type keyboard, but you mentioned later there is no real key, when in fact the type keyboard has actual keys that you can press). Apple fan boy much?

I do agree, this review is not objective enough in the sense that you forgot about the Type Cover/Touch Cover, which many users will include in their purchase to make this product more complete. BUT, technically, you don't need to pay for the touch/type cover because there are much cheaper bluetooth keyboard out there, like what Acer did with w700. However, some form of keyboard IS a must, and that money needs to count. Using older Windows software which are not touch optimized with your touch screen is going to be a horrific experience. Although, you do have a pen, which has "much more" accuracy and can actually function as a mouse to adequate extend (I own a Lenovo tablet with a pen, so I know the capability of a pen). But the reduced screen size due to on screen keyboard will have another problem.
IMHO, just based on hardware, Surface Pro has the advantages over MacBook Air with: - better resolution and more pixels per inch - a touch screen - a digitizer pen (which makes the touch screen that much more valuable) - convertible into tablet and it has a detachable keyboard for extra freedom. - is still slightly cheaper if you get a bluetooth keyboard instead of the touch/type cover However, It does have the disadvantage of - non-adjustable screen angle due to weird kickstand design - slightly shorter battery life (not too significant). - is slightly more expensive if you get the type/touch cover that makes this Microsoft design complete as a product.
Every other aspect are more or less the same if not exactly the same. But clearly, you can see there are more pros than cons when comparing Surface Pro to MacBook Air, which should be expected because it took Microsoft several more months to prepare. IMHO, If MS wants Surface Pro to be a success, I think they should have just included the Touch/Type cover for that price. At least that way they can gain more popularity in the market for their new designs.
Gareth Paterson
Thankyou!! At last someone who gets it!
It's odd because I'd been doing several comparisons of the Asus Vivo Tab vs the Mac Book Air and I kept finding that the MBA was too large, too heavy and had really crappy battery life. To add insult to injury many reports in the wild that the battery life is far less than the manufacturers stated one and it turns out that when it says 128GB you actually got less than 100 available. Plus on app availability the MBA suffered hugely compared to the entire library of x86 software available today. The Vivo Tab is obviously far superior...go figure...
Finally someone gets the comparison right.
(And before I get hit by the wave of trolls, understand the comparison above is not serious. It's pointing out the futility of comparing the surface pro to an iPad.)
Gareth Paterson
@Harvey Lubin - Google "Mac Book Air battery life" seems like a common issue that many people get as low as 2.5 hours on not overly heavy usage.
c w
I'm confused...
How is it hard to use on your lap? Did MS leave the on-screen keyboard out of W8 or something?
Is it too bulky to rest the bottom your lap and angle up with your non-preferred-for-pointing hand?
Steven OConnor
The surface Pro for what it is is way too close you can buy a Mac Mini and an iPad Mini If you throw in the touch cover or type cup of the surface costs. It is a good attempt but the battery life was in my opinion key. One of the biggest points of tablets are that they have long battery life or above laptop usability In terms of battery life. I think Steve Jobs said it best if he can't do a few things better than what's out now there's no place for it. Getting viruses of malware tablet I dont look forward to that aspect. I want to run Windows are you the runaround laptop or desktop that I have the building. But until I need windows stick With Mac And my iPad.