Wow, this is something I\'d buy right away. But when and where is it going to be available in Europe?

Another variation of the WaterPik...

And anybody who\'s ever used a WaterPik knows what a *MESS* they create!

I use a WaterPik. It\'s not a mess if you handle it with intelligence. That said, it uses about 10 oz (60 teaspoons) of water per cleaning, so I\'m very skeptical of the SonicCare claim of getting the same results with 1 teaspoon (equivalent to .17oz).

I went to their website and can\'t find a single word regarding the product.

There U go ... here\'s the address http://www.usa.philips.com/c/airfloss/287417/cat/en/

http://www.sonicare.com/dp/ca_en/OurProducts/AirFloss.aspx
There is hope after all that I won\'t need dentures by 30.

I have been looking for something easier than flossing for a long time. I don\'t like sticking hands in my mouth to floss, even floss threaders are a pain in the you-know-what, and the water pik is a huge mess. As soon as I read this article I went to Amazon and read the reviews. Although some of the reviews state that the airfloss does not work as well as regular flossing, it will work for me because I often skip regular flossing since I abhor doing it. I ordered it from Amazon today.

Never used a Waterpik, but I think those only provide pulses of water. This AirFloss seems to be closer to the Braun/Oral-B Oxyjet system, which mixes air and water in the stream. I\'ve been using an Oxyjet for years and really like the squeaky clean feeling of my teeth after using it each day, followed by the Oral-B electric toothbrush in the same base station.

Good flossing gets below the gum line also, not just between the teeth. Any dentists want to back me up on that? And if you read it carefully you\'ll see it actually says this is 99% better then not flossing. Of coarse flossing will be better and you can do it while you watch tv.