What happened to acid dewpoint?
At the extremely low temperatures heat is often useless due to acid characteristics of the gas stream.
This is probably a useless invention.

euss, even if you were correct, the invention would still be a far greater contribution than your comment. Who ever said you had a clue?
The idea is amongst the G2 concepts, which rightly suggest we make secondary use, recycle, per se, the energy. It makes perfect sense. When we use a gas heater, it's foolish that we don't install a heat exchange unit in the exhaust pipe, to heat fresh water as well. It's wasteful not to make full use of the energy expended.

You\'d think, with all of this tech know-how that the diagram of this contraption would be legible. That low-rez image was so bad that I couldn\'t make out a single word of it...? Stop putting up useless photos and diagrams. It undermines the importance of the items in question. Not too much to ask, is it?.

An interesting engine. Presently the highest Solar to Grid efficiency is held by the Parabolic dish/stirling engine combination. How is this engine equal to or better than a stirling engine? Could it be practically combined with a parabolic dish for a stationary application. Traditional steam engines have enough torque at low end to not need a transmission. How does this engine compare. Nice article but results in more questions than answers.

STERLIN engines operates in these realms also,.. but requires high precision manufacturers, like a taiwanese machine shop,.

I would like to know if it is possible for a stirling engine to generate power at room temperature. It sounds like an impossible perpetual motion energy system but it will be decreasing the temperature of the area around it. What are the problems with this system.

how is it that there are large pools FULL of spent nuclear fuel that need extreme amounts of cooling and yet on has figured out a method of using technology such as this in order to turn the COPIOUS amounts of heat from spent nuclear fuel into electricity.

@Khan: It IS entirely possible to make a Stirling engine run at room temperature.
Being a \'heat\' engine, you always need a temperature differential between the hot cap and the cold cap. Fortunately, as you reduce the Height/diameter (or Length/ diameter, your preference) the required differential becomes LESS. So, a large diameter, squat profile would yield an engine that runs on say, sunlight as long as the cold cap was, say, in contact with the cold ground... Remember, it IS a heat pump, so its always moving heat from the hot cap to the cold cap.
To all the rest: As I recall, when \"big Nick\" Tesla was a young boy, he invented a device called a bladeless turbine. This reduces precision machining to near zero and runs on the flow of any fluid flow, be it gasseous or liquid. I wonder A) how the efficiency stacks up against other \"shaft drivers\" and B) how long it will take the alternative energy community to \"rediscover\" this device. Quite a kid that Nicky!
BTW, Edison allowed him to test it out at the Niagra Falls power station and the results, as reported to me, were 200 Hp (150 Kw) in a box 2ft x 2ft x 4ft.
Also, some folks have made these using a stack of CDs.

A lot of time ago NSU had publicated about the part of the rods and crakshaft of a thermic engine in the parasitic resistances. It was a very little part, the big one beeing due to rings and piston. The camshaft levers, valves and springs had a modest contribution, that was a good surprise. A lot of things change with the time. A lot of other change with steam use instead of combustion. For example, the law of the de-compression must be very important and favorise long stroke. The Cyclone steam engine has a long stroke ? I worry it is difficult with this spider bearing and a six cylinder star disposition. Short stroke is a nice thing to favourise high revolutions, in the case of a low-pressure steam engine and his 3,000 RPM... hum! Each time I see a new way to escape at a crankshaft or to have a better one I remember that a crankshat is a very good way to change an alternative movement in a rotative one ... or the contrary !

Very nice to see anyone with Faith. But Burnerjack may not ignore longer that Tesla Turbine is difficult to tune. The high efficiency we hope is not always obtained but always the torque is very low out of the RPM range. Perhaps it would not be a big problem to produce electricity, but for other use ? Experiments with compact disk are nice but dont allow steam use ! Anyway I mind a part of the reasons of the Tesla turbine difficulty with real world remains in the fact that the fluid goes the wrong way. I mean in a Tesla engine, not in a Tesla pump. At less it makes the demonstration that the boundary layer is well glued to the disks. It looks difficult to enter steam by the center. But is it imposible ? Indeed it would not be more a Tesla turbine, and would have lost a lot of interest for the Tesla Lovers. Bernardin.