Space

James Webb spots "impossibly massive" galaxies in the distant universe

James Webb spots "impossibly massive" galaxies in the distant universe
An artist's impression of the Milky Way galaxy, which has a similar mass to newly discovered "impossible" galaxies in the early universe
An artist's impression of the Milky Way galaxy, which has a similar mass to newly discovered "impossible" galaxies in the early universe
View 2 Images
An artist's impression of the Milky Way galaxy, which has a similar mass to newly discovered "impossible" galaxies in the early universe
1/2
An artist's impression of the Milky Way galaxy, which has a similar mass to newly discovered "impossible" galaxies in the early universe
James Webb images of the six newly discovered massive galaxies
2/2
James Webb images of the six newly discovered massive galaxies

The James Webb Space Telescope keeps challenging our best models of how the universe evolved, thanks to its incredible ability to see farther back in space and time than ever before. Now it’s discovered some “impossibly” gigantic galaxies that contain more mass than was thought to exist in the entire universe at that time.

Because the speed of light in a vacuum is constant, we watch objects in space on a time delay. The Sun is eight light-minutes away, so we’re seeing it as it existed eight minutes ago. The next closest star, Alpha Centauri, is about four light-years away, so our view of it is four years behind schedule.

If you extend that principle out into the deepest reaches of space, you can literally look back in time billions of years, getting a glimpse into how galaxies evolved over the lifetime of the universe. And with the unprecedented power of the James Webb Space Telescope, we can now see closer to the beginning of time than ever before, in clearer detail.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, this means we keep finding things that go against our current understanding of the early universe. A recent study of James Webb data revealed that barred spiral galaxies – those like our own Milky Way that have an advanced structure – existed billions of years earlier than thought possible.

Now, the telescope has spotted new sights that should be impossible, according to our current models. A team of astronomers, led by the Swinburne University of Technology in Australia, has observed six galaxies that are far more massive than was thought possible for their time. In fact, they have more mass than the entire universe was thought to contain at that point.

James Webb images of the six newly discovered massive galaxies
James Webb images of the six newly discovered massive galaxies

“The six galaxies we found are more than 12 billion years old, only 500 to 700 million years after the Big Bang, reaching sizes up to 100 billion times the mass of our Sun,” said Ivo Labbé, lead researcher on the study. “This is too big to even exist within current models. This discovery could transform our understanding of how the earliest galaxies in our universe formed.”

The measurements still need to be followed up with further observations, to confirm the masses and where it’s all located. Alternative explanations are still possible, the team says, but these could still yield brand new discoveries themselves.

“One alternative, equally fascinating, is that some of the objects belong to a new class of emerging supermassive black holes, never seen before,” said Labbé.

Either way, it looks like our understanding of the universe will need some revision. The research was published in the journal Nature.

Source: Swinburne University of Technology via Scimex

4 comments
4 comments
MeToo
I think the universe is much older than they think it is.
Catweazle
I think it likely that concepts such as size and age which are relevant to what I would call the"middle dimensions" become progressively less relevant to phenomena such as the totality of the Universe in the same way that quantum physics becomes decreasingly relevant as we deal with smaller and smaller particles and shorter and shorter time scales, so concepts such the size and age of the Universe are to all intents and purposes irrelevant.
It seems that in both cases the more we observe the less we end up knowing!
(That is the short version...)
Nelson Hyde Chick
For me it is hard to give a crap about someplace I could only get to by flying at the speed of light for centuries.
Ranscapture
Obviously instead of trying to stand proudly by their theory that the Big Bang happened and that the universe is only 13 billion years old and that only some of the matter existed at first, they should step back and get rid of those certainties. The universe is probably infinitely old, has infinite matter, and doesn’t follow models.