Facebook User December 23, 2010 06:51 AM Gaaaah. Just looking at the conceptual image is triggering my acrophobia. rsm December 23, 2010 01:08 PM The trees crack me up, like there is really enough depth for the trees to root,... And if they did, the roots would destroy the building. YukonJack December 23, 2010 02:23 PM What to say when the neighbors kids lose their soccer ball over the fence comes to my mind. kalqlate December 23, 2010 05:38 PM Intriguing design. Beyond the problems noted by others, the on-the-edge yard barrier would never be approved by any city planner fearful of wrongful death lawsuits. There would have to be at least a 3 or 4 foot safety surround from the inner hub all the way around to the other side of the dwelling, possibly with yet another plexi-glass barrier on the very edge. Yes, most of today\'s balconies are built without any type of safety surround, but something that gives a false sense of a yard might cause people to perceive them more like a yard and behave less carefully on them than they would on a balcony.Nice concept though. An inbetween level could also be halved and serve as an upstairs for the lower unit and a downstairs for an upper unit. In fact, luxury units could have a full middle and split a lower and an upper giving the dweller a sense of a tri-level dwelling unit. Pretty cool. yrag December 23, 2010 08:15 PM "the "Stairscraper" doesn't offer the housing density of traditional skyscrapers" I wonder if this could be solved by designing the Stairscraper as a double helix instead of a single helix. I would think that would also and stability through symmetry.btw image 7 is ridiculously hilarious, showing a kid SNOWBOARDING at the edge of the balcony! Really? BigGoofyGuy December 23, 2010 09:23 PM For a shorter building, I could it working. For a taller building ( a skyscraper), I would think the upper levels would be impractical. The upper levels would have to deal with winds. I would go for the lower levels but not the higher ones (fear of heights). :) Marcus Carr December 25, 2010 09:10 PM You\'d have no privacy at all in the \"yard\", as half a dozen or so of your upstairs neighbours would have a birds-eye view, as would people further up looking out the back windows. I think I\'d prefer to have a balcony under the upstairs unit, affording total (albeit shaded) privacy. twt December 28, 2010 08:55 AM Great Idea, I like it. Every house have thier own garden/open space and large enough. Build it, I will consider like to buy one. salvatore.forte December 28, 2010 01:03 PM Nice and beautiful design. I think that the advantages will by far overcome the price and the space-saving issues. Here in Barcelona such terraces (not the building) are very common and they really add somethin special to a flat: going outside, reading and eating all this stayin home is simply awesome. And for those who may think that such a project could be too expensive I would suggest to have a look at all the collateral problems derived from an insane architecture in the suburbs. Here in Europe, million lives in such inhumane buildings with small windows, no gardens and very poor access to public transport. Nice buildings, and nice place to live make people feel and act better. alcalde January 7, 2011 10:29 PM nostarme, forget soccer balls. For those walking past the building, \"it\'s raining cats and dogs\" might become literally true. And yrag, if we build the buildings in a double helix design, they might start reproducing on their own!