Greg P October 30, 2013 06:42 AM The best option is to have quadcopters with camera tracking devices follow cars and then have several of them that can detect if occupants leave the car and track and follow several occupants. this would mean no car chases, and being able to follow and track people that have stolen a car and then discarded it to run on foot. Air highways need to be defined for drones / UAVs, so that we can get these devices in use quicker. Tommie le Roux October 30, 2013 07:17 AM What a good idea, get it commercial ASAP so that it could be used all over the world and make it as cheap as possible. Riaanh October 30, 2013 08:30 AM Haven't we seen this one in a James Bond movie a few years ago? Excellent tegnology though - you can run, but you can never hide! Captain Danger October 30, 2013 09:27 AM I know cops are supposed to be the good guys, I know polices chases are not good and if you are running from the cops there is a chance innocent people will be hurt. that being said I still can't help but side with the poor bastard being chased. Every time I see a chase on TV I am on the side of the guy running. Here in Ontario Can. you cannot have a radar detector , The speed limit on the highways is a ridiculous 62 mph, fines are very high and the cop's always seems to be out in force with speed traps. Now we have a law that says' if you are 30 mph over the limit you are "racing" , the police can confiscate your vehicle and leave you on the side of the road and you are liable for a 10/k fine. Similar to the "hooligan law" in Australia Loz Blain wrote about. Having out run the police twice (back in my younger days) I always like to have the option of just putting the hammer down and going for it. With devices such as this it just makes it that much riskier. Many will think that this is a good thing but to me it is just one more nail in the coffin if personal liberty. My heart grows heavy reading stories such as these. Time to youtube Ghost Rider. owlbeyou October 30, 2013 11:42 AM As with other policing technologies, like radar, the speeding perps will find a way to skirt around this (by coating the rear of their cars with silicone?) It cannot be easy to hit a moving target either. At 120+mph the projectile would also have to compensate for the turbulence. Martin Rayner October 30, 2013 12:48 PM What an amazingly simple but effective idea. Don't like the cost, but the simplicity of this is inspirational. Now we need to adapt it to personal GPS tags to take out the individual shoot outs. Bill B October 30, 2013 10:20 PM This flies right in the face of a recent high court ruling that stated that a warrant is required before attaching a GPS tagging device to a vehicle. Mark_Pavlichenko October 30, 2013 11:31 PM Say... that not easily bypass using a GPS blocker ? i not sure but doesn't people sell that kind stuff in china. pmshah October 31, 2013 01:48 AM What would be the cost of each device ? I am sure the "attachment" would be pretty low so all the ones that bounced off would have to be written off, finders keepers? What kind of impact would these devices survive? Moving away from the current discussion I sometimes feel it might be a good idea to bring back technologies developed by so called "aborigines" like the literally multi-threaded device they would throw at incapacitate the fast escaping animal by wrapping it up ! May be the foot chase would become much easier ! Slowburn October 31, 2013 04:30 AM $5000 for a potato gun? Besides with the way thing are going they will just tell the fleeing car to shutdown or drive into a bridge piling.