Daishi April 10, 2017 04:04 AM An interesting point I saw in the Electrk article is that the cells produced at the buffalo factory are going to be Panasonic (and not Silevo). SolarCity will eventually standardize on Panasonic for all installs. I missed the news about the switch and there was some confusion if Panasonic panels would be made along side Silevo panels at the same factory but it seems like after a $256 million investment into the project Panasonic will be the exclusive panel technology produced at the factory but it may borrow some tech from Silevo in the new panels. myale April 10, 2017 07:15 AM Will not restricting air flow under the panels with the skirt trap hot air under the panels - and the hotter the panels the lower the efficiency? Wolf0579 April 10, 2017 12:22 PM I could give a rats rear about how they look. Higher power output is my concern. ezeflyer April 10, 2017 01:59 PM A billionaire that cares about restoring our deteriorating environment is a true rarity. Thank you Elon Musk Grunchy April 10, 2017 02:25 PM The irony is Tesla was the AC man and Edison was the DC man. And here everything with Tesla on it is all DC devices. Oh, well. Douglas Bennett Rogers April 10, 2017 02:43 PM Grid storage can move forward economically and we see some. Battery isn't there yet. I was holding out for Dow Powerhouse shingles, as they also serve as a roof. They essentially create a black roof, which has about twice the thermal gradient of a white roof. The PV efficiency also goes down. Also, the bottom of the roof sheathing wasn't accessible. Derek Howe April 10, 2017 07:22 PM They look nicer then other panels...but that means nothing without the price tag.ezeflyer - A lot of Billionaires put money towards the Earth being...better. Because when you have billions, you can do nearly anything. Jonathan Cole April 13, 2017 07:34 PM This is a bad idea along with Tesla's other idea for solar tiles. Only people who have no understanding of solar would suggest such solutions. Solar cells must be cooled by having the heat that builds up underneath the panels be removed by convection. Blocking the removal of heat makes solar panels much less efficient and more prone to failure. Of course underneath solar tiles, there is no opportunity for cooling unless some other technology is employed that would add tremendous expense. Plus tiles would have many more interconnection points which are not only more likely to fail, but are also going to be difficult to track down when they do fail. I am kind of surprised that Tesla does not have better solar engineers working for him. noteugene April 15, 2017 12:07 AM Some of you guy's are just assuming there's a heat build up under these panels, making them less efficient - you don't know. One guy on here said he couldn't give a rat's ass about appearance. I've been saying for years that a major flaw in selling panels was because aesthestics were being overlooked...that the only thing the engineers were concentrating on was efficiency. Who knows, maybe someone read one of my post. Maybe most guys don't care about appearances - but women do. Most guys would play hell spending a few thousand if the wife was against it. Since this article says nothing about efficiency, can't say if I'd purchase them or not but at least they are on the right track. Personally - I'm more inclined to purchase something that adds to the curb appeal of my home creating more value. I could tolerate a slight loss in efficiency. Don Duncan April 15, 2017 10:30 PM Why a grid tie at all? Or is that required to get the subsidy? I will buy when the subsidy is no longer necessary because it is financially viable, competitive. I am a voluntarist/capitalist.