socalboomer June 15, 2011 08:07 PM It\'s rather unfortunate that Nintendo is boasting about it\'s brand new product only being 50% faster than machines that have been on the market for what, three years? In that three years, computers have improved FAR more than 50%; we have more than 50% more RAM, far more than 50% more HDD, we run at more than 50% more FPS on our games (when they\'re not locked), etc. Scion June 15, 2011 10:22 PM Nintendo have cleverly removed itself from the speed/power arms race. As a result the consoles are cheaper which means greater market penetration. The Wii only has to be powerful enough to play games good enough to be fun. A 50% margin over the xbox 360 and PS3, which have been out for nearly 6 years, would mean it could certainly play games good enough in terms of graphics and size. Microsoft and Sony have engaged each other in a power war in which neither can really win. I personally own an Xbox and not a Wii, but that is because I prefer the kinds of games the Xbox has. Now that I have a little daughter, I may well buy a Wii (or the equivalent in five years time) because it is cheap and the games are more group / family oriented. I can\'t wait to see what Sony and Microsoft come out with. I\'m hoping it will be a technological marvel the likes of which even god has never seen. :) Chi Sup June 16, 2011 07:17 AM What do you call a great powerful platform with no games? It\'ll take years before you see anything decent for this tablet. And Blu-ray, just like the rest of the optical medias, is a dead end tech. In case you haven\'t been around for last decade it\'s NAND that\'s the future. IvorJetski June 16, 2011 09:44 AM Yes, good idea! They should use NAND and bring back the cartridge! ctigers June 16, 2011 02:22 PM The console may be cheap but each one of the controllers is going to cost way more than most will want to pay. Racqia Dvorak June 16, 2011 04:25 PM Hurrah, a new console that can\'t even come close to what a mid-range gaming computer can do. Real progress right there. Bet they\'ll still ask full price for an inferior product. Looks like we\'re in for several more years of \"cutting edge\" ports with mid-2000\'s graphics...if that, even. These consoles are so old and under-powered that it\'s slowing down the entire gaming industry as companies have to decide between making a graphically-advanced game, losing an entire market, or program an obsolete POS to cater to console gamers. Ha, I bet the only console that could come close to even playing the first Crysis, a 3 year old game, is the PS3. And it would fail. Aythami Espantoso Luis June 16, 2011 08:05 PM Congrats for being faster than a 7-8 years old machine! Gregg Eshelman June 17, 2011 06:30 AM Nintendo has done this before. The NES was the two year old Famicom repackaged and shipped to the rest of the world. They did it again, repackaged the Super Famicom as the SNES - and we bought millions of them. So now Nintendo is once again going to put out a game console built at least partly around two year old technology and the world will be on it like a cat in a catnip patch. Kristopher Jones June 20, 2011 11:29 AM Well at least they are making progress. The pc is just poorly optimize which is why you have the ridiculous high specs. Personally I find it pitiful a Sony Labtop can only run the games on low settings with lag and it's much more powerful then PS3. A $900 Labtop mind you. Consoles are perferable because 1 you never have to concern yourself with pc slowdown without being technical or paying for it 2 you never have to wait to download a game as it's plug & play 3 you never have to worry about a virus or pay for one 4 Devs create better games and at faster rates when they can just focus on a lock spec 5 better graphics dont equal better game at a certain point. 60 fps, 1080p plus extra graphic effect it just becomes a preference then 6 devs have to make money. History proves that high end games don't make the most money compare Crysis sales with Halo series Doesn't matter if you think it sucks In the end games aren't about you or I but the business and the industry as a whole We either play it buy it or tell em kiss our ass but either way when we die games will still be made and Nintendo will continue doing Nintendo. You ain't gotta like it, it's just the way things is. Are we entitle to anything? Are there not more important things then the pride of gaming? Why waste your life on that which is vain? Track your life by 10 years. Do those games really matter now? Now fast forward 20 years Do you still wan't to waste more time on gaming obsession? Enjoy the game, enjoy life, & try not to bust a blood vessel over gaming obsession. In the end don't we all just wanna play good games that's fun and don't break us Afterall,not everyone is richey rich Think of the industry as a whole We are a community. There are more poor then rich, hence, why technology is so behind. Games will live on Will Sharp June 27, 2011 03:11 PM It\'s kind of ridiculous to compare a console to a PC and say that a console will suck just because it\'s not as good as a $2000 gaming rig today. Consoles need to stick with last-gen hardware simply because of their lower price point. Even if these PCs are far, far more powerful than consoles, how many games truly take advantage of all of that power?