MattII July 7, 2014 01:05 AM This does not look safe to me. Gizmag_Reader_2014 July 7, 2014 01:27 AM Airbus has not received a granted patent for this invention according to the USPTO. Rather, it appears that a patent application has been filed. Paul Robertson July 7, 2014 05:16 AM Cameras fail. Light does not. This is an important consideration. I think the idea has merit but I'm not sure how to get around that. hkmk23 July 7, 2014 05:19 AM And of course there will never ever be a power failure.......... Slowburn July 7, 2014 05:20 AM Leave it to Airbus to design a system that a single broken wire renders the pilot blind. It goes nicely with the pilots not knowing what the other pilots are doing with their controls and the auto throttle that does not move the throttle levers. Deres July 7, 2014 05:27 AM This is not possible because to be safe a plane system must take in account failures. A total failure of the electrical system would leave the pilots blind with such a system. Thus a back-up non electric system would have to be kept for the 2 pilots, meaning a window and placing them in front anyway. Nevertheless, not being so extreme, the nose form could be more aerodynamics and the windows less bulky and maybe prtected with metal in nominal conditions and unocculted only in case of failures. Brian M July 7, 2014 05:45 AM Not exactly new - its the thought of thing that's been seen in Science Fiction movies for years. Still it does tell us that the Airbus engineers at least watch Startrek! Ramon Verhoeven July 7, 2014 06:01 AM for all critics : planes never fly blind ? flying on instruments is most common. night maybe compensated with lights, thick fog or rain make instrument flying a must. further electricity fails makes most airplanes brick which fall out of the sky. A dreamliner with even more electrics then other planes is more vulnerable then other planes ? If a plane can keep flying on the ram-jet, I think that can include keeping the screens working. Stephen Carter July 7, 2014 07:27 AM Forget public acceptance. They'll need to convince the pilots first. To see a lancet shaped nose complete with cockpit windows look at the Handley Page Victor. Visibility wasn't all that great, however. t__ July 7, 2014 07:39 AM Windowless passenger cabin is the better idea? Even if it fails, the passengers will not have any problems by not being able to see outside. And the structural integrity will get a huge gain. And as a real Star Trek fan - I like it.