John Parkes July 20, 2012 12:01 PM Nice boat...where are the torpedos? the machine guns? I think the best weapon is still the helicopter gunships and their mobile base...those countries where the pirates come from should be limiting fuel sales to reduce the range of offshore boating to their own waters, vessels wishing to leave national waters for international should be monitored by the nation of origination...and have mandatory ID beacons or they should be sunk. Jon A. July 20, 2012 06:23 PM How long did it take "nanotech" to go from sci fi concept to completely meaningless marketing buzzword?I just made a boat out of paper. Being composed of molecules, it too employs nanotech. Gary Richardson July 22, 2012 06:47 PM Hmmm, I am skeptical on the strength and weight claims for this vessel.The author states that the vessel is 8 times stronger and 66% lighter than Aluminum. However, my expeience teaches me that composites are strongest in the direction the fibers are laid and do not have the same omnidirectional strength. Otherwise, the composite would be 12.1212 times stronger pound for pound (8 / .66) and at the same strength would only weigh 8.25% of the weight (91.75% lighter). Therefore, I believe the craft is 8 times stronger directionally to make up for omnidirectional deficiencies in strength but is 66% less weight (52647LB - 66% of 52647LB = 17900LB) and therefore has about 3 times the range because it is approximately 1/3 the weight. Adrien July 22, 2012 08:05 PM 8100kg for a 57' boat is pretty damn impressive.Normal GRP for that sort of length would be at least 3 times the weight.When can we expect to see consumer vessels using these hull materials? Yan Schechter July 22, 2012 08:58 PM lets see..."claims its 1500 nautical mile (2778 km) range" and "full tank of 6435 l (1700 gal)", thats about 1.2 miles per gal, typical Sea Ray performance - the top speed is not bad "maximum speed of over 40 knots", then again 11.9ft beam is allot less water displaced then a typical 14-16ft Sea Ray beam which will do 30+ knots at WOT. Sounds like the US Navy will be paying allot of money for a "nanotech enabled" (not even sure what that means) Boston Whaler with huge fuel tanks, and it comes with "shock-mitigating seats" instead of your standard soft boat lazy-boy style boat seats. So instead of using a heli with a missile to get rid of the turds once and for all will will be chasing them for upto 5 days and then provide them with a shock-mitigating cruise experience to bring them home just so they can refuel and do it again? Yan Schechter July 22, 2012 09:02 PM If you think the weight is impressive look no further then any Cigarette boat, similar length and about same beam...amazingly same weight. Then again its simple fiberglass, you can't charge the army a gazillion dollars for regular plastic, but nanotech enabled is a different story. ezeflyer July 23, 2012 02:09 PM Carbon fiber is not bulletproof. Some nano materials have proven to be unhealthy and I don't mean because things made from them carry weapons. They could be the next asbestos. Griffin July 23, 2012 02:30 PM Diesel fuel weighs 7.15 lbs./gallon.1,700 gallons weighs 12,155 lbs.Surely they're not claiming 40+ knots WITH full fuel,gear,weapons AND crew?The pirates often run smaller,lighter twin/triple outboard speedboats that can go 55mph plus and just run back and forth short distances to their base.Range is irrelevant here- just get some vintage Aronow Blue Thunder boats by Don Aronow(RIP) and you'll be better off.If you want speed,40 knots is just not fast. Get over 80 in a pursuit and you're getting somewhere.Fully armed helicopters would have even better coverage from above,though.The pirates have the edge over nanotech because of home field advantage and the law of large numbers.Two relatively slow boats? I'm sure they're not worried.I have designed and built faster military boats with better fuel efficiency so I am not speaking from mere opinion. Art Brooks July 23, 2012 07:29 PM Wow. Where the hell is the nano technology, carbon fiber doesn't really mean much, its used everywhere. Sounds good though. Burnerjack July 23, 2012 11:18 PM I wonder how this speed/range performance compares to a hydrofoil of similar dimensions. I'm no marine architect but it would seem that 'flying' through the water would be more efficient than pushing it out of the way. As far as the pirate aspect goes, as in any other human endeavor, the more dangerous it is, the less likely one is to engage in it. If people stop trying to placate and engage instead, there would be less pirates alive and less interested in attempting it. 4 M1A2 will engage at standoff distances leaving shippers safe and pirates dead. Maybe leave one alive to go back and tell the others.