Environment

Climeworks: The ambitious startup out to reverse climate change by capturing carbon from the air

Climeworks: The ambitious star...
Climeworks recently carried out a carbon capture pilot project at the Hellisheidi geothermal power plant in Iceland
Climeworks recently carried out a carbon capture pilot project at the Hellisheidi geothermal power plant in Iceland
View 27 Images
Climeworks recently carried out a carbon capture pilot project at the Hellisheidi geothermal power plant in Iceland
1/27
Climeworks recently carried out a carbon capture pilot project at the Hellisheidi geothermal power plant in Iceland
Climeworks recently carried out a carbon capture pilot project at the Hellisheidi geothermal power plant in Iceland
2/27
Climeworks recently carried out a carbon capture pilot project at the Hellisheidi geothermal power plant in Iceland
Christoph Gebald and Jan Wurzbacher, two engineering graduates from ETH Zurich, founded Climeworks in 2009
3/27
Christoph Gebald and Jan Wurzbacher, two engineering graduates from ETH Zurich, founded Climeworks in 2009
Christoph Gebald and Jan Wurzbacher, two engineering graduates from ETH Zurich, founded Climeworks in 2009
4/27
Christoph Gebald and Jan Wurzbacher, two engineering graduates from ETH Zurich, founded Climeworks in 2009
With onsite carbon capture technology, the Hellisheidi geothermal power plant in Iceland has been billed as the world's first negative emissions power plant
5/27
With onsite carbon capture technology, the Hellisheidi geothermal power plant in Iceland has been billed as the world's first negative emissions power plant
Since 2007, scientists working on the CarbFix project have been exploring how the gas can be made to react with certain rocky material and turn into solid minerals
6/27
Since 2007, scientists working on the CarbFix project have been exploring how the gas can be made to react with certain rocky material and turn into solid minerals
Climeworks recently carried out a carbon capture pilot project at the Hellisheidi geothermal power plant in Iceland
7/27
Climeworks recently carried out a carbon capture pilot project at the Hellisheidi geothermal power plant in Iceland
Climeworks recently opened up a new DAC plant in Italy
8/27
Climeworks recently opened up a new DAC plant in Italy
Carbon capture and storage remains prohibitively expensive, for now
9/27
Carbon capture and storage remains prohibitively expensive, for now
Climeworks plans to capture one percent of global carbon emissions annually by 2025
10/27
Climeworks plans to capture one percent of global carbon emissions annually by 2025
Climeworks recently opened up a new DAC plant in Italy
11/27
Climeworks recently opened up a new DAC plant in Italy
Climeworks plans to capture one percent of global carbon emissions annually by 2025
12/27
Climeworks plans to capture one percent of global carbon emissions annually by 2025
Climeworks plans to capture one percent of global carbon emissions annually by 2025
13/27
Climeworks plans to capture one percent of global carbon emissions annually by 2025
Climeworks plans to capture one percent of global carbon emissions annually by 2025
14/27
Climeworks plans to capture one percent of global carbon emissions annually by 2025
Climeworks carbon capture system draws in ambient air with huge fans and traps C02 with a selective filter material
15/27
Climeworks carbon capture system draws in ambient air with huge fans and traps C02 with a selective filter material
Climeworks recently opened up a new DAC plant in Italy
16/27
Climeworks recently opened up a new DAC plant in Italy
Christoph Gebald and Jan Wurzbacher, two engineering graduates from ETH Zurich, founded Climeworks in 2009
17/27
Christoph Gebald and Jan Wurzbacher, two engineering graduates from ETH Zurich, founded Climeworks in 2009
Christoph Gebald and Jan Wurzbacher, two engineering graduates from ETH Zurich, founded Climeworks in 2009
18/27
Christoph Gebald and Jan Wurzbacher, two engineering graduates from ETH Zurich, founded Climeworks in 2009
Climeworks plans to capture one percent of global carbon emissions annually by 2025
19/27
Climeworks plans to capture one percent of global carbon emissions annually by 2025
Christoph Gebald and Jan Wurzbacher, two engineering graduates from ETH Zurich, founded Climeworks in 2009
20/27
Christoph Gebald and Jan Wurzbacher, two engineering graduates from ETH Zurich, founded Climeworks in 2009
Christoph Gebald and Jan Wurzbacher, two engineering graduates from ETH Zurich, founded Climeworks in 2009
21/27
Christoph Gebald and Jan Wurzbacher, two engineering graduates from ETH Zurich, founded Climeworks in 2009
Climeworks carbon capture system draws in ambient air with huge fans and traps C02 with a selective filter material
22/27
Climeworks carbon capture system draws in ambient air with huge fans and traps C02 with a selective filter material
Climeworks first commercial carbon capture in Switzerland
23/27
Climeworks first commercial carbon capture in Switzerland
Climeworks' captured carbon has been used to raise vegetable crops in Switzerland
24/27
Climeworks' captured carbon has been used to raise vegetable crops in Switzerland
Climeworks plans to capture one percent of global carbon emissions annually by 2025
25/27
Climeworks plans to capture one percent of global carbon emissions annually by 2025
Climeworks' captured carbon has been used to raise vegetable crops in Switzerland
26/27
Climeworks' captured carbon has been used to raise vegetable crops in Switzerland
Climeworks' captured carbon has been used to raise vegetable crops in Switzerland
27/27
Climeworks' captured carbon has been used to raise vegetable crops in Switzerland

If solving the problem of climate change was a 100-piece jigsaw puzzle, systems that suck C02 out of the air might make up one or two pieces. But as a warming planet and rising global emissions loom large, there are many who believe this unproven technology will have an important role to play – the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) among them. Climeworks is a Swiss company at the vanguard of this technology, and having just completed a year-long pilot project collecting C02 at the world's first negative emissions power plant, is rather optimistic about the way things are headed.

Is carbon capture a good idea?

The idea of removing carbon dioxide from the air has long been a controversial one. A range of technologies have been bandied about as a way of achieving this, including planting monumental amounts of trees to remove C02 biologically through photosynthesis, carbon sequestration where it is pulled from the chemical processes in power plants before it enters the atmosphere and pumped into underground reservoirs, and direct air capture (DAC), where it is collected from the ambient air.

The trouble is, none of them have been proven to be economically viable on any kind of meaningful scale. Beyond that, experts worry that pursuing these technologies will do more harm than good. The danger is that a great deal of the world today leans on burning fossil fuels and pumping out C02 to keep things ticking over. If direct air capture systems become cheap, reliable and widespread, what incentive would there be to change?

On the other hand, drastic times call for drastic measures, and the startling report published by the IPCC this week says the world will need to rely on these types of technologies to avoid dangerous levels of global warming. Prepared by 91 authors from 40 different countries, the report states that limiting warming to 1.5° C (2.7° F) above pre-industrial levels will involve fast and far-reaching changes in almost every aspect of society. We'd need to cut C02 emissions by 45 percent by 2030, and eliminate them entirely by 2050.

"This means that any remaining emissions would need to be balanced by removing CO2 from the air," the scientists say, before going on to note that the effectiveness of carbon removing techniques are unproven at scale and may involve risks for sustainable development.

True believers

Christoph Gebald and Jan Wurzbacher, two engineering graduates from ETH Zurich, founded Climeworks in 2009
Christoph Gebald and Jan Wurzbacher, two engineering graduates from ETH Zurich, founded Climeworks in 2009

Christoph Gebald and Jan Wurzbacher, two engineering graduates from ETH Zurich, founded Climeworks in 2009 on a mission to make carbon capture economically viable. Its DAC systems work by using huge fans to draw ambient air through an integrated filter material that selectively captures only C02. Once the filter is full, the C02 is heated to 100° C (212° F) and then cooled to 45° C (113° F), allowing it to then be used for a variety of applications, such as carbonating beverages, creating other climate-neutral fuels and certain types of agricultural materials.

It took some time, but in 2017 Climeworks opened its very first commercial plant, and the world's first carbon capture plant that sells its product to a customer. Sat atop an incineration facility in Hinwil, Zurich, the system uses waste heat generated by that facility to bring the captured carbon up to the required temperatures, and pipes the finished product directly to a nearby greenhouse where it is used to help grow vegetables. Climeworks says the Hinwil plant captures 900 tons of C02 every year.

Climeworks first commercial carbon capture in Switzerland
Climeworks first commercial carbon capture in Switzerland

There are many promising possibilities when it comes to turning captured C02 into useful products, ranging from concrete to solar fuels to carbon nanofibers for high-end sports gear. But our demand for energy generated by fossil fuels far outweighs the market demand for captured carbon. Humans pump 30 to 40 gigatons of C02 into the air every year alone, with a single gigaton equal to one billion tons. So for carbon capture methods to really put a dent in the problem, the C02 simply needs to be locked away somewhere. For good.

Capturing carbon and storing it underground has long been touted as an option, but storing the gas in these reservoirs carries the very real risk of leaks. Since 2007, scientists working on the CarbFix project have been exploring how the gas can be made to react with certain rocky material underground and turn into solid minerals, a process thought to take hundreds or even thousands of years.

More specifically, they've been pumping it into the basaltic rocks in Iceland's geothermal fields to try and fast track this process. And, in a hugely significant breakthrough in 2016, they succeeded. By using captured carbon to create carbonated water and pumping that water into underground wells, the liquids reacted with elements like calcium, magnesium and iron to form solid carbonate minerals. It was found that more than 95 percent of the C02 had been converted, and astonishingly, did so in less than two years.

A power plant that cuts carbon emissions

With onsite carbon capture technology, the Hellisheidi geothermal power plant in Iceland has been billed as the world's first negative emissions power plant
With onsite carbon capture technology, the Hellisheidi geothermal power plant in Iceland has been billed as the world's first negative emissions power plant

One year ago, Climeworks joined forces with CarbFix to conduct a pilot project at ON Power's Hellisheidi geothermal power plant near Reykjavik, the largest power plant in Iceland and one of the largest in the world. The plan was simple, capture carbon from the ambient air using Climeworks' system and palm it off to the CarbFix scientists, who would convert it into carbonated water and pump it underground to become basalt rock.

Being a geothermal power plant, Hellisheidi's carbon emissions are around 99 percent less than that of a coal-fired facility, which presented the team with an opportunity to create the world's first "negative emission power plant." That may have been true but only for a fleeting moment or two, because as Climeworks spokesperson Martin Jendrischik explains, it was anything but a smooth ride.

"Freezing temperatures combined with high humidity was one of the challenges," he tells New Atlas. "But there is also a high concentration of sulphur in the air, which is also a special hurdle to overcome. Climeworks changed some electronic parts to get around the problems caused by these conditions."

After a steep learning curve and a series of improvements along the way, Climeworks was ultimately able to keep the DAC system running for several months without failure. But with just a single collector on site, the carbon captured with the system fully functioning was a negligible amount – around 12.5 tons over the three months, according to Jendrischik.

Christoph Gebald and Jan Wurzbacher, two engineering graduates from ETH Zurich, founded Climeworks in 2009
Christoph Gebald and Jan Wurzbacher, two engineering graduates from ETH Zurich, founded Climeworks in 2009

"The next step will be to scale up the plant so that several thousand tons of CO2 can be captured and stored underground per year," he says. But after ironing out some kinks in the harshest of conditions, the team harbors far grander ambitions than that.

"At sites like ON Power's Geothermal Park in Hellisheidi we have the potential to remove several hundred thousand to even millions of tons of CO2 annually from the atmosphere," says Dr. Edda Sif Aradóttir, Deputy Managing Director at Reykjavik Energy. "Together with ON Power and Climeworks we are currently planning the next scale-up steps for further increase DACS capacity at our site."

CarbFix's approach is particularly promising, not just because it greatly fast tracks the process of turning C02 into solid material, but because basalt happens to be the Earth's most abundant rock type. This opens up many opportunities to replicate the CarbFix approach elsewhere, with the USA, Middle East, Africa and even the ocean floors all possibilities.

"The storage capacity is such that, in theory, basalts could permanently hold the entire bulk of CO2 emissions derived from burning all fossil fuel on Earth," says Dr. Sandra Snaebjornsdottir, a geologist working for CarbFix.

A drop in the ocean

The technologies championed by Climeworks and the like won't be putting a dent in the global emissions anytime soon. The company has just opened up another demonstration DAC plant in Italy, which it expects to collect 150 tons of C02 each year. The company's stated mission is to capture one percent of global carbon emissions annually by 2025. The magnitude of this undertaking is not lost on Jendrischik.

"To do this, we will need 250,000 plants like the commercial plant in Hinwil, or 750,000 shipping containers full of CO2 collectors, the same number of containers to pass through Shanghai harbour every two weeks," he says.

Which brings us to the cost. Carbon capture and storage remains prohibitively expensive, and no matter how many fizzy drinks are made with Climeworks' product, there will need to be serious legislative shifts that incentivize carbon removal on a grand scale. At present, it costs the company around US$600 to capture a single ton of C02, though the company is confident of cutting this figure to around $115. "For these cost reductions, Climeworks has a clear plan and knows what has to be done," says Jendrischik.

"Deployment of DAC on a mass global scale is something the global economy can handle," he continues. "Long-term, Climeworks' technology has the potential to remove CO2 from the atmosphere at a gigaton scale, something which will definitely have the ability to help reverse global warming."

As part of its business model, Climeworks plans to offer emissions removal as a service to the public in 2019, allowing anybody to reverse their emissions if they wish. You can hear from the company's founders in the video below.

More information: Climeworks

Climeworks - A Technology to Reverse Climate Change

15 comments
Fairly Reasoner
What are the plants supposed to breathe, then?
paul314
At $600 per ton, that's about $240 trillion for all the carbon we put into the atmosphere. But total world GDP is only about $100 trillion. So unless we can get carbon-reduction costs under about $200/ton it's clear that from a purely accounting point of view the only profitable decision is to let civilization fall. (What you would do with any profits once civilization had fallen is left as an exercise for the reader.)
christopher
Humans are so stupid. Except for these guys, who have found a scam to make money of all those stupid humans who can't grasp the idea that planting trees, rather than clearing more forests to make way for "solar farms" would do that - not that either will have any noticeable effect on the climate...
Stephen Colbourne
How long does it take this plant to break even ,removing more tonnes of CO2 than it took to build and power itself. I would have thought planting and harvesting trees would be a lot simpler and more efficient.
Harry van Trotsenburg
There is yet an alternative to bind CO2 : olivine , see: https://www.greensand.nl/en/about-greensand/greensand-explained
Harry van Trotsenburg
see also : https://www.olino.org/articles/2009/12/24/co2-vreter-olivijn-nader-onderzocht/ and : " 9)Het wegstoppen in de grond kost ca. € 50,- per ton CO2, afhankelijk van de toepassing olivijn is dit vanaf ca. €10,- ton CO2 " translated to bring CO2 into the ground cost will be E 50 / per ton for olivin about E 10 ..... : "
jerryd
The solution is simple. Put all the cost of it, pollution FFs make in them at the source and rebate as a dividend to the lower 80% of income people.
DaveWesely
Why is planting trees not feasible? Better yet, what about other cellulosic plant materials like switchgrass? Turning dead plant matter into a charcoal like material is not that technically difficult. It could probably be done right in the field - and if done right, could be "sequestered" right into the topsoil. Problem is farmers don't have much political clout, so that solution is ignored. Plus, until we adopt a system of carbon credits, nothing but grandstanding will be done.
Subtle
Once the blue-green algae appeared on Earth some billions of years ago, the problem of too much atmospheric CO2 began to be relieved. The result of just plain old photosynthesis has made life on Earth possible. Geologically speaking, concentrations of atmospheric CO2 are unusually low (even at .04%). The process will continue to sequester CO2 into the ocean and into rocks, or coal, or crude oil and natural gas. In the meantime, the old photosynthesis will continue to provide food and oxygen, which is essential for most of today's forms of life. I wish the young developers well in their endeavors in the private sector. But please don't tout my government. They have been gullible to too many stupid schemes and don't need any more distractions. Bo Hoye
ljaques
So they need 750k plants @ $4m apiece ($3T) and capture cost is $600/T x 225 million T ($150M), and you add 675 Terawatts of energy to make it happen. That's, um, very, very ambitious...and GDMF EXPENSIVE. It seems that the KoolAid has been spiked even more this year. Where are they going to get the carbon-free energy?