Third time's the charm! SpaceX's Starship roared into orbit today from the company's Starbase near Boca Chica, Texas. Larger and more powerful than the venerable Saturn V, the giant rocket lifted off into the history books at 8:25 am CDT.
Starship may have been the premiere project of SpaceX and a key component of NASA's Artemis Moon program, but it was also the butt of many jokes and the target for skepticism. This isn't surprising, given the tendency of the Starship prototypes to blow up – including on the last two test flights.
That changed today as the two-stage Starship rose from the launch pad on the thrust of 33 engines generating over twice the thrust of the Saturn V, making Starship the largest and most powerful flying object ever made.
The flight took place under good weather and without holds, with the maximum dynamic pressure reached at the 52-second mark into the flight. Unlike more conventional rockets where the first stage shuts down and the second stage separates, at the two-minute 42-second mark all but the core engines of the Super Heavy first stage shut down and the second stage ignited while still attached, in a maneuver known as "hot staging."
After stage separation two seconds later, the first stage carried out a controlled engine burn to return to the Gulf of Mexico for a soft splashdown. Meanwhile, the second stage, called Starship or "the Ship" continued its engine burn until it achieved orbital velocity.
During the flight, Mission Control conducted a number of tests, including pumping cryogenic propellants from one tank to another as part of an effort to develop methods of refueling spacecraft for projected Moon missions. In addition, the payload bay doors were opened and closed in anticipation of the day when Starship will carry cargo and even passengers.
Restarting a Raptor engine was scheduled, but wasn't carried out because the spacecraft's trajectory needed no corrections. Communications were lost with Starship during reentry and before it reached its planned splashdown site in the Indian Ocean, about 65 minutes after launch.
But both the booster and Starship itself failed to put the cherry on the sundae; the idea was to have both execute a mock precision landing and splashdown. SpaceX wasn't planning to recover either, and both seem to have ended up where they should've, but the final stage didn't go according to plan.
So while this was overall a very successful mission, The FAA has launched an investigation into why neither the the Super Heavy booster nor the Starship vehicle made the planned 'soft landings' in the ocean. As a result, Starship is effectively grounded until these issues are solved.
"A return to flight is based on the FAA determining that any system, process, or procedure related to the mishap does not affect public safety," reads the FAA statement. "In addition, SpaceX may need to modify its license to incorporate any corrective actions and meet all other licensing requirements."
SpaceX is leading the investigation, and the FAA has pledged to "be involved in every step," with final approval on the report.
Source: SpaceX
Edit: An earlier version of this article, which cited SpaceX livestream sources, has been updated.
It took NASA & company several years and dozens of failures.
(Falcon 9 -- they'll *never* be able to land and reuse it... Umm...).
BTW: Love your site. Keep it up.
So while Fail Fast has taken 22 years to get to the point of failing in their designs again Apollo went from nothing to the moon in 9 years including developing all the tech and infrastructure to do it.
They're fine.. and they manage to get things done eventually. But nothing overly exceptional.
SpaceX skipped the relight test because there were safety parameters for that too and there were problems with the spacecraft that caused them to decide not to attempt it.
Without that engine relight test, I doubt that the FAA will let them go for full a full orbit flight on the next go.
I wonder if they'll be able to test deploy a few Starlink satellites anyway...even on a ballistic flight path.
BTW, the article is overly critical of the FAA. There has to be root causes for any non-nominal results, even if those results were not critical to the success of the key objectives. Those root causes might cause or point to other problems and need to be chased down and corrected. This is all standard procedure. By treaty, the International responsibility for any injury or property damage done by a rocket such as this lies with the country from who's soil the launch originates. You might say that the FAA is doing CYA for our nation.