Mobile Technology

Implications of Apple’s new Lightning connector

Implications of Apple’s new Li...
The new Lightning connector introduced on the iPhone 5 and updated iPod touch and iPod nano
The new Lightning connector introduced on the iPhone 5 and updated iPod touch and iPod nano
View 2 Images
The new Lightning connector introduced on the iPhone 5 and updated iPod touch and iPod nano
1/2
The new Lightning connector introduced on the iPhone 5 and updated iPod touch and iPod nano
The Lightning to 30-pin Adapter and cable
2/2
The Lightning to 30-pin Adapter and cable

It may still lack a micro SD card slot and didn’t get the much-rumored NFC capabilities, but the most controversial change ushered in with the new iPhone 5 – as well as the updated iPod touch and iPod nano – was undoubtedly the introduction of the new “Lightning” connector. So just what does the switch from the 30-pin connector to the new 8-pin connector mean for consumers?

Apple has a history of being ruthless when it comes to dropping technology it believes is past its use-by date. The company dumped floppy disk drives from its iMac G3 in 1998 and ditched the optical drive from its MacBook Air in 2008 and MacBook Pro with Retina display earlier this year. It also phased out the Mini-DVI from 2008 in favor of the Mini DisplayPort. Now the 30-pin connector is joining the list.

Technology has advanced quite a bit since the 30-pin connector replaced FireWire on the third-generation iPods back in 2003. So it’s not surprising to find the new Lightning connector has a number of advantages over its predecessor. It is reversible, meaning it doesn’t matter which way something is plugged into it, and it is faster and more durable. Apple also describes it as all-digital and adaptive, meaning that it adapts to use only the signals required by whatever is plugged into it.

But it’s the 80 percent reduction in size compared to the 30-pin connector that has allowed Apple to significantly reduce the thickness of the three new Lightning connector-toting iOS devices unveiled yesterday. And in the gadget world where thin is in, the days of the 30-pin connector have long been numbered.

But what does it mean for consumers weighing up a potential purchase? If you’re new to the Apple fold then the new connector won’t really have any impact at all. The same applies for those upgrading from a previous model but who haven’t shelled out on any Made for iPod accessories. However, given the tremendous popularity of such accessories, these people will be in the minority.

No, the chorus of disapproval has come from those who have already invested in docks and other accessories built around the 30-pin connector. In an attempt to quell this chorus, Apple has announced a number of accessories to provide backwards compatibility with existing accessories, but these come at a price. A Lightning to 30-pin Adapter retails for US$29, while a 20 cm (7.8 in) Lightning to 30-pin Adapter cable sells for $39. There’s also a Lightning to USB Cable that retails for $19.

The Lightning to 30-pin Adapter and cable
The Lightning to 30-pin Adapter and cable

Even individuals are likely to complain about the extra expense, but spare a thought for businesses, such as hotels or gyms, that have invested in large numbers of 30-pin compatible iOS accessories. The cost of adding compatibility with the new Lightning connector through (easily pilfered) adapters is a much bigger problem.

Aside from waiting for the inevitable budget "knock off" adapters, there is another alternative. Wireless. There are already devices such as the CoolStream Bluetooth Receiver for iDock that plug into a dock to give it Bluetooth capabilities. While such devices allow you to go on using your existing accessories, the obvious downside is that the dock will no longer charge the mobile device.

That leaves upgraders just one more option. Passing your old dock or accessory onto a friend or family member and shelling out for one of the new Lightning connector compatible units set to hit store shelves in the near future. After all, Apple could really use the money.

40 comments
Pierre-André Aebischer
All digital = no analog audio or video i/o... it means some old gadgets won't be recognized, even with an adapter
Didrik Ganetz
This is Apple in a nutshell. They done this since the first Mac. "If you want to play with our new toys you WILL pay for everything anew".
rastoha
Hey shepherd, what is the best way to milk a sheep? http://d24w6bsrhbeh9d.cloudfront.net/photo/5355849_700b.jpg
Airsoft-World Scotland
I'm an avid Apple fan, have been for years. Sadly, Apple has more or less just attempted to play catchup with Samsung and their 'latest' (May) Galaxy SIII and will need to again if they wish to match the Samsung Note 2. I honestly believe that the only thing stopping people from dumping the iPhone for the Samsung offerings is their tied software and functionality. Apples Apps are no longer a great monopoly, iTunes to boot and with Samsung giving you open source Android and microsim expansion, I and anyone else in my opinion would be totally crazy to upgrade from an iPhone 4S to a 5. The sheep will follow regardless and what a hell of a waste of money and resources that will be.
Oh, what happened to the EU ruling on micro-USB connectors across all manufacturers?
Jorge Alonso
Plus in Europe this goes in the face of all other phone manufacturers agreeing in one standard for connectors. Oh, of course, they will sell you an adapter priced as gold. The UE should ban the iPhone5 and send Apple back to the drawing boards just for this. Call me hater but when Apple falls off its pedestal you will not find many crying.
Simon Karch
"ruthless when it comes to dropping technology it believes is past its use-by date"
yeah right, that's why "lightning" is still a USB2.0 connection. This connection is alreasy 10years old! yes usb2.0 exactly like the iPhone 1 !
Stradric
I think you missed an important point here. The reason the adapter is so expensive is because it's an 'active' adapter. In other words, there's a chip on there that performs the digital to analog conversion. Thunderbolt also requires active cables btw.
Also, it has been reported by Ars Technica that Apple is not licensing out the ability for 3rd party versions of this cable. So we're not likely to see legal, 3rd party, cheaper alternatives.
professore
It is about time that Apple accepts that, amongst other things, they cannot create standards unilaterally....by definition the term "standard" indicates that many organisations are conforming to it. Nor can they afford to play silly buggers anymore with Android devices at 4 times iOS and the gap growing daily, they really need to do everything possible to attempt to slow down the loss of faith in Apple and its weird ideas.
Slowburn
Apple systems advancements "Because selling adapters is so dam profitable."
Rann Xeroxx
I am using the 110v to USB plug from my old BlackBerry that is 3 gens old and the microUSB plug from my last device to charge and connect my brand new HTC (which is really not a new model even) Android.
I just don't get Apple people, I really don't.