Smart grid leads to more efficient electric trains

Smart grid leads to more effic...
An elevated electric train in Holland (Photo: Shutterstock)
An elevated electric train in Holland (Photo: Shutterstock)
View 3 Images
SAFT Batteries Max20 containerized Li-ion battery bank (Photo: SAFT Batteries)
SAFT Batteries Max20 containerized Li-ion battery bank (Photo: SAFT Batteries)
Elevated electric train in Holland (Photo: Shutterstock)
Elevated electric train in Holland (Photo: Shutterstock)
An elevated electric train in Holland (Photo: Shutterstock)
An elevated electric train in Holland (Photo: Shutterstock)
View gallery - 3 images

Electric commuter trains, while quiet and fast, have one glaring inefficiency – when they brake at a station, the energy of the moving train is lost, even when the motors are electrically reversed. Capturing the electrical energy generated during braking is simple, but efficiently redistributing it through the power grid is not. The result, in too many systems, is that the braking energy is simply wasted. Now an energy storage project in Philadelphia aims to capture and efficiently utilize that braking energy, providing a clear view into the potential of the forthcoming smart grid.

In a conventional electric train, the electrical energy generated while stopping is fed immediately into the third rail (or the overhead power lines). The problem is that the third rail has a very limited capacity for absorbing a sudden flood of electrical energy. As a result, the voltage of the third rail rises considerably. However, the third rail voltage is controlled within narrow limits to avoid system instabilities. If the voltage rises too much (as when slowing at a passenger stop), the excess energy must be dissipated. The third rail is then connected to a resistive load, and the braking energy is converted into waste heat.

In essence, the power grid of the electric train system does not have sufficient capacitance to absorb the braking energy while staying within acceptable voltage, frequency, and phase limits (these are AC systems, so a bit more complicated than if the systems were DC). The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) has embarked on a pilot project to better absorb and reuse braking energy. Their engineering studies showed that while practical banks of ultracapacitors cannot provide sufficient additional capacity, banks of lithium-ion batteries can. The power is not only recovered efficiently, but is fed back into the regional power grid rather than remaining confined within the commuter train's third rail system.

The SEPTA pilot project captures the braking energy of trains through a large scale battery storage system. The braking energy is then fed into the regional transmission organization, which coordinates movement of wholesale electricity in 13 eastern states and the District of Columbia, where it is sold to neighboring power grids in the frequency regulation market.

The frequency regulation market sells power from a local grid that is generating too much power to a local grid which is not generating enough. This is called frequency regulation because a generator that is overloaded slows down, and an underloaded generator speeds up, while the entire network of grids has to provide power at the same frequency and phase to avoid hot and dead spots in the local grids.

SAFT Batteries Max20 containerized Li-ion battery bank (Photo: SAFT Batteries)
SAFT Batteries Max20 containerized Li-ion battery bank (Photo: SAFT Batteries)

The SEPTA project takes a different path. Located in a substation that serves five or six stations on SEPTA's elevated train line, it senses when the track voltage is too high (about 800 volts), and pulls energy from the third rail, storing it in a large-scale lithium-ion battery (the MAX20 Intensium Max containerized battery bank) from Saft Batteries. The MAX20 can store and deliver power at a 1.5 MW rate, and has a storage capacity of about 500 kWh – roughly equal to 280 Toyota Prius battery packs. When the voltage of the third rail falls too low, the battery pushes current into the third rail. This negative feedback mechanism leads to a stable operating point for the smart grid and efficient reuse of the braking energy.

The operating software balances the simultaneous processes of regenerative capture, regulation performance, and energy market participation by selecting in which market to participate based upon market pricing, battery state of charge, and availability of regenerative energy from the trains.

“We are excited to be a part of this groundbreaking achievement,” said Audrey Zibelman, CEO and President of Viridity Energy, the designer of the operating software. “In a smart grid world, two‐way digital information exchange opens up new horizons. By harnessing the regenerative braking power of the trains and empowering SEPTA to become a virtual power generator that can provide valuable and environmentally responsible service to the electric grid, we can fulfill the promise of interconnected systems on the grid and behind the meter responding dynamically to reliability and economic signals to strengthen the grid.”

Source: Saft Batteries

View gallery - 3 images
The velocity of the train is known variable. Put a flywheel in to capture the energy of deceleration and use it the next time you accelerate.
I'm sure someone though of a flywheel, it's obvious. They add a lot of weight, and can be very dangerous. This seems like a pretty good design to me.
Paul Meerts
I remember tesla's ferro nickel battery story of last week those seem far more potent than li-ion packs when it comes to quick charge and decharge needs in braking and acceleration situations. No memory effect, safe and simply better suitable for this purpose, but the concept of this method is a sound one!
- Think you're referring to our story on Edison's nickel-iron battery: http://www.gizmag.com/scientists-give-new-life-to-thomas-edisons-nickel-iron-battery/23102/ - Ed.
Heat, is the traditional by-product, ideal, that can heat a small scale molten salt thermal storage plant for use in the station and immediate surrounds, wither through conversion back to electricity or as thermal energy, heating, hot water industrial heat etc....
Trains stopping in stations is sort of fairly regular.... (not called a timetable for nothing)
Charging batteries, looses energy on the conversion just as any conversion does.... so arguments that a battery bank is better / worse needs study....
The reason this was never done is because ENERGY IS CHEAP.... it is that simple, it is just that we are in a touchy feely age, of Green, that we have to be seen to be doing more... (also Energy prices have gone up, as people are willing to pay for their guilt trip without rioting in the streets..) I have been on efficiency drives for decades.... wondering why we have been losing all of this good energy for so long.... It is because at the low dollar value it simply ain't worth bothering....
This could all have been done decades ago (they have had liquid sodium reactors for that long and they are far more difficult to deal with), oh another, why use Li ion, lead acid batteries are by far the most Cost effective battery system in common use.... Li-ion variants are about the Least cost effective.. for stationary applications there is no benefit using lightweight batteries... for transport and portable applications there is plenty of reason why...)
Nicolas Zart
Hi Brian, the Gottardo line at the French/Swiss border has been recouping downhill regenrative energy for decades. While you are right, most trains don't make use of regenerative braking, SNCF and CFF have done that for a very long time. Great article by the way.
Michał Borsuk
The problem with DC systems is that early systems had quite low voltage (max. 3000V), and thus bigger currents, so the supply stations had to be closer to each other.
More stations means shorter supply sections, and the current cannot be transported cheaply between sections, so it has to be used within a section - when one train brakes, another must be accelerating, or sent back to the network - but that involves DC-AC conversion.
The third solution is the one presented here is storing the current in cells. While this is also not an easy piece of pie, and it has its losses, it seems to me that it's the best solutions where trains don't use the network very densely.