Technology

GPS alternative taps cosmic rays for underground or underwater navigation

GPS alternative taps cosmic rays for underground or underwater navigation
Scientists have demonstrated a proof-of-concept for a new navigation system that can work underground and underwater by tracking particles from cosmic rays
Scientists have demonstrated a proof-of-concept for a new navigation system that can work underground and underwater by tracking particles from cosmic rays
View 2 Images
Scientists have demonstrated a proof-of-concept for a new navigation system that can work underground and underwater by tracking particles from cosmic rays
1/2
Scientists have demonstrated a proof-of-concept for a new navigation system that can work underground and underwater by tracking particles from cosmic rays
A diagram illustrating how the muometric wireless navigation system (MuWNS) works. The green dots represent reference stations on the 6th floor of a building, while the white streaks indicate muons. The red arrow in the basement represents the path taken by the researcher with the muon detector, while the white dotted line shows the path that the MuWNS was able to infer
2/2
A diagram illustrating how the muometric wireless navigation system (MuWNS) works. The green dots represent reference stations on the 6th floor of a building, while the white streaks indicate muons. The red arrow in the basement represents the path taken by the researcher with the muon detector, while the white dotted line shows the path that the MuWNS was able to infer

GPS is a powerful navigation technology, but it doesn’t work as well inside buildings, underground or underwater. Now engineers in Japan have developed and tested an alternative technology that uses cosmic rays to track movement beneath a building with precision of a few meters.

GPS uses a network of a few dozen satellites in precise orbits around Earth, and receivers in devices like phones are constantly listening out for signals from those satellites. The devices can work out how far they are from any detected GPS satellite, and when they pick up signals from at least four of them, the device can determine its relative position on the ground to within a few meters.

While this is pretty accurate for day-to-day use, GPS signals bounce off rocks, water, and surfaces like walls, meaning the system loses precision underground, underwater, inside buildings or even just in densely built-up areas. So researchers at the University of Tokyo have developed a new technology they call the muometric wireless navigation system (MuWNS), which is designed to be more accurate in those situations.

The key to MuWNS is that the “signals” it’s tracking can pass right on through solid materials. These signals are particles known as muons, which are produced when cosmic rays enter Earth’s atmosphere and interact with particles already present, creating a cascade of secondary particles. And this rain is constant – it’s estimated that every square meter of Earth’s surface is pelted with around 10,000 muons every minute.

The team tested MuWNS deep in a multi-story building, where regular GPS would have trouble maintaining its precision. A scientist carrying a handheld muon detector was sent into the basement of a building, and the position of that detector was tracked using four reference stations on the building’s sixth floor.

Those reference stations functioned like GPS satellites – by tracking paths of muons picked up by each station and the detector, the position of the scientist could be traced with a high degree of accuracy. That said, there’s still plenty of room for improvement, the team says.

A diagram illustrating how the muometric wireless navigation system (MuWNS) works. The green dots represent reference stations on the 6th floor of a building, while the white streaks indicate muons. The red arrow in the basement represents the path taken by the researcher with the muon detector, while the white dotted line shows the path that the MuWNS was able to infer
A diagram illustrating how the muometric wireless navigation system (MuWNS) works. The green dots represent reference stations on the 6th floor of a building, while the white streaks indicate muons. The red arrow in the basement represents the path taken by the researcher with the muon detector, while the white dotted line shows the path that the MuWNS was able to infer

“The current accuracy of MuWNS is between 2 m and 25 m (6.6 and 82 ft), with a range of up to 100 m (328 ft), depending on the depth and speed of the person walking,” said Professor Hiroyuki Tanaka, lead author of the study. “This is as good as, if not better than, single-point GPS positioning aboveground in urban areas. But it is still far from a practical level. People need one-meter accuracy, and the key to this is the time synchronization.”

The researchers say this could eventually be rectified with atomic clocks that fit into portable devices, which are in development but are currently too expensive for widespread use. The other components used are already able to be miniaturized. The experiment also only tracked the researcher’s path after the fact, but future work will investigate doing so in real-time.

In recent years, muon detectors have also helped scientists peer inside solid structures like the Great Pyramid of Giza, and test a precise clock synchronization system that works underground and underwater. This latest experiment shows that one day this technology could help augment GPS in areas where it currently doesn’t work well.

The research was published in the journal iScience (PDF).

Source: University of Tokyo

2 comments
2 comments
Filipe
I've got to say that 10,000 particles per square meter, per minute, does not seem to me like a lot. That is merely 166 particles per second. If one is moving at say 10 kmph, which is 2.78 meters per second, now you get about 60 particles per square meter to help you. It seems you would have to be lucky, in order to catch at least 3 of those 60 particles in that square meter in order to triangulate the signal. Unless my calculations are wrong, or some other piece of data is missing, it seems to me that this system could only work to track very slow-moving targets. So the fact that it is proven to work, seems mindboggling to me under such circumstances. I suppose some of the trick would be that the detectors don't need to catch the particle, but rather detect it within some wide area where it may fall.
notarichman
sounds good for miners, especially when there is a mine collapse to find the miners. however, some mines go down thousands of feet and horizontally miles.