Falsified "giant spider" fossil is actually an altered crayfish
Earlier this year, many squeamish people were understandably freaked out by the discovery of what was claimed to be the fossilized remains of a disturbingly-big spider. Now, however, it turns out that the "spider" is actually a crayfish with extra legs painted on.
The remains were initially discovered in northeast China's Lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation, by fossil hunters who lived nearby. They sold their find to scientists at the Dalian Natural History Museum, located in the province of Liaoning. Those researchers proceeded to publish a scientific paper on the fossil, naming the spider Mongolarachne chaoyangensis, and declaring it to be a species previously unknown to science.
Scientists in Beijing had their doubts, though. Not only was the so-called spider suspiciously large – with a main body length of about 35 mm (1.4 in) – but it also looked rather odd.
They proceeded to borrow the fossil from its current home at China's Southern University of Science and Technology, after which they sent it to Prof. Paul Selden at The University of Kansas. Selden specializes in the study of spider fossils.
"Immediately, I realized there was something wrong with it – it clearly wasn’t a spider," he says. "It was missing various parts, had too many segments in its legs, and huge eyes. I puzzled and puzzled over it until my colleague in Beijing, Chungkun Shih, said, 'Well, you know, there’s quite a lot of crayfish in this particular locality. Maybe it’s one of those.'"
Utilizing a technique known as fluorescence microscopy, Selden and colleagues were subsequently able to distinguish between the original fossil – which was indeed a "badly preserved" crayfish – and some extra painted-on legs. And while Selden states that it's not unusual to come across doctored fossils for sale to tourists, it's considerably less common to see academics being taken in by them.
His findings are described in a paper that was recently published in the journal Paleontology.
Source: The University of Kansas
Please keep comments to less than 150 words. No abusive material or spam will be published.
Fooled or just desperate to make a name for themselves in a competitive field?