DARPA developing digital airstrikes

DARPA developing digital airst...
Atrist's concept of a PCAS heads-up display
Atrist's concept of a PCAS heads-up display
View 3 Images
Atrist's concept of a PCAS heads-up display
Atrist's concept of a PCAS heads-up display
PCAS links ground commanders digitally to CAS assets
PCAS links ground commanders digitally to CAS assets
PCAS uses a HUD display, so soldiers don't need to take their eyes off the battlefield
PCAS uses a HUD display, so soldiers don't need to take their eyes off the battlefield
View gallery - 3 images

The popular image of modern warfare is the digital battlefield where cyber soldiers have Terminator-like video displays and can call in an airstrike with the shine of a laser beam. While information technologies are revolutionizing the military, when it comes to calling in Close Air Support (CAS), it’s still World War One – where a misread or misheard grid reference can end up with soldiers being hit by their own artillery. DARPA’s Persistent Close Air Support (PCAS) program hopes to improve this.

Smart bombs, laser targeting and intelligent missiles have made laying a munition on exactly the desired spot so common that it’s hardly newsworthy. For most ground commanders, however, calling in CAS still involves pilots and ground observers relying on voice directions and a common paper map, which isn't always available. It can take up to an hour for a strike to be arranged, during which time an enemy can escape or get in the first punch, and even then there’s an ample chance of a fatal error.

The PCAS program is an all-digital system that lets a joint tactical air controller call up CAS from a variety of sources, such as aircraft or missile platforms, to engage multiple, moving and simultaneous targets. By eliminating all the radio chatter and map fumbling, the exercise is much faster and more accurate with reduced risk of friendly fire incidents.

PCAS links ground commanders digitally to CAS assets
PCAS links ground commanders digitally to CAS assets

“Our goal is to make Close Air Support more precise, prompt and easy to coordinate under stressful operational conditions,” says Dan Patt, DARPA program manager. “We could use smaller munitions to hit smaller or moving targets, minimizing the risk of friendly fire or collateral damage.”

DARPA describes PCAS as a “system of systems” that uses commercial IT products and models such as open interfaces, element modularity and mobile software applications. Generally, it consists of manned and unmanned aircraft, next generation graphical user interfaces, data links, digital guidance and control, and advanced targeting and visualization tools. In practice, it breaks down into two major component systems.

The first is PCAS-Air, which as the name suggests, deals with airborne assets. It involves the use of internal guidance systems, weapons and engagement management systems, and communications using either the Ethernet or aircraft networks for high-speed data transmission and reception. PCAS-Air processes the data received, and provides aircrews via aircraft displays or tablets with the best travel routes to the target, which weapons to use, and how best to use them.

The other half is PCAS-Ground, intended for improved mobility, situational awareness and communications for fire coordination. Soldiers on the ground can use an HUD eyepiece wired to a tablet that displays tactical imagery, maps, digital terrain elevation data, and other information. This means they can receive tactical data from PCAS without having to keep looking at a computer screen. Coordination with airborne pilots is achieved through in-flight GPS tracking.

PCAS uses a HUD display, so soldiers don't need to take their eyes off the battlefield
PCAS uses a HUD display, so soldiers don't need to take their eyes off the battlefield

A key part of PCAS is Smart Rail, which reduces PCAS-Air components into modular packages that have plug-and-play capability. The modules can be attached to manned and unmanned aircraft using standard external mounting rails from which they can be plugged into the craft’s systems.

“The Smart Rail is an easy way to get digital air-ground coordination onto current and future aircraft,” Patt says. “Just as the USB revolutionized how we use IT-enabled devices, modular technologies like the Smart Rail could greatly reduce development time and costs for military technology and speed deployment of PCAS and other capabilities across the Services.”

From December 2012 through March 2013, PCAS deployed PCS-Ground to Afghanistan using 500 Android tablets equipped with PCAS-Ground situational awareness software. According to DARPA, field reports indicated a drastic improvement over the use of paper maps.

Source: DARPA

View gallery - 3 images
Todd Dunning
Great to see these advancements that narrow the scope of war actions to just a small smoking pothole where the bad guys were a minute ago.
Not only is it much safer for civilians and good guys, it's even more lethal for bad guys.
S Michael
this is not new... Been with us for some time.
Am I the only one who finds it ironic that they are talking about world war one methods in a derogatory way while showing an aircraft that has been in service for nearly 40 years?
Don't get me wrong the A-10 is a good aircraft. I've heard stories of them coming home with only half the plane left, missing half a wing, half the tail and one engine out. It's just ironic to hear about "ancient" history methods while employing an aircraft that is older than I am. I guess that could be seen as a sign of how well they were engineered. Even after 40 years no one has come up with an effective replacement.
Brandon Ralph Powers
@VirtualGathis, It's not that they use the same planes from 40 years ago, its the same platform. Thats like saying a Ford F-150 is ancient, well the platform yes.
Legendary, perhaps apocryphal, misheard command from WWI: "Send three and fourpence, we're going to a dance"
(send reinforcements, we're going to advance).
The last A-10 came off the assembly line in 1984. They have received avionics upgrades but they are still the same airframes.