Military

Russia flies strategic cruise missile propelled by a nuclear engine

Russia flies strategic cruise missile propelled by a nuclear engine
The 9M730 Burevestnik (NATO name SSC-X-9 Skyfall) taking off
The 9M730 Burevestnik (NATO name SSC-X-9 Skyfall) taking off
View 4 Images
An earlier test of the 9M730 Burevestnik (NATO name SSC-X-9 Skyfall)
1/4
An earlier test of the 9M730 Burevestnik (NATO name SSC-X-9 Skyfall)
The 9M730 Burevestnik (NATO name SSC-X-9 Skyfall) taking off
2/4
The 9M730 Burevestnik (NATO name SSC-X-9 Skyfall) taking off
Skyfall may have a similar design to that of the SLAM missile cutaway shown here
3/4
Skyfall may have a similar design to that of the SLAM missile cutaway shown here
Skyfall may be similar to the US SLAM missile of the 1960s
4/4
Skyfall may be similar to the US SLAM missile of the 1960s
View gallery - 4 images

Russia has flown a nuclear-arm-capable cruise missile propelled by a nuclear engine. In a televised conference chaired by Russian President Vladimir Putin the 15-hour flight of the 9M730 Burevestnik (NATO name SSC-X-9 Skyfall) was confirmed.

It seems like something out of the Cold War – and in some ways, it is. However, it's not entirely a surprise in defense circles. Since December 2001, there have been reports that Russia is looking at modernizing its nuclear forces with weapons that would have the range of an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM), yet would be able to dodge radar and avoid any anti-ballistic missile defenses.

Now, Russia is saying that just such a weapon has been constructed and flight tested.

"I remember vividly when we announced that we were developing such a weapon, even highly qualified specialists told me that, yes, it was a good and worthy goal, but unrealizable in the near future," said Putin. "This was the opinion of specialists, I repeat, highly qualified. And now the decisive tests have been completed. Much work remains to be done to put these weapons on combat alert, of course; all the regulations must be followed. Nevertheless, as far as I understand, the key objectives have now been achieved."

An earlier test of the 9M730 Burevestnik (NATO name SSC-X-9 Skyfall)
An earlier test of the 9M730 Burevestnik (NATO name SSC-X-9 Skyfall)

Chief of the General Staff Valery Vasilyevich Gerasimov then reported that the Skyfall had not only been successfully tested on October 21, 2025, but had flown for about 15 hours, covering a distance of 14,000 km (8,700 miles).

The existence of Skyfall was first made public by President Putin in a 2018 address when he declared that Russia was developing a weapon with unlimited range that could fly an unpredictable course and was "invincible" when it came to evading current or future Western defenses.

Skyfall attempted its first flight test in 2016, though this was hampered by many technical difficulties and in August 2019 a second test ended in an explosion at a naval range in the White Sea, resulting in the reported death of five nuclear engineers and a radiation spike that was detected by the US.

Skyfall may have a similar design to that of the SLAM missile cutaway shown here
Skyfall may have a similar design to that of the SLAM missile cutaway shown here

Russia is extremely tight lipped about Skyfall, but experts have been speculating that it is similar to the American Supersonic Low-Altitude Missile (SLAM) program developed under the aegis of Project Pluto, which was tasked with creating an intercontinental, nuclear-powered cruise missile during the Cold War in the 1960s.

If this is the case, then Skyfall is a cruise missile similar to a Tomahawk except that instead of a jet engine it has a very small nuclear reactor that heats the incoming air, generating thrust. Since the fuel is nuclear, this means that Skyfall has an indefinite range – certainly not unlimited – until the propulsion mechanism fails.

Such a cruise missile would have a very long flight time and would be able to fly at low altitudes while hugging the terrain. By changing course, speed, and altitude unpredictably, it would be extremely difficult to track and intercept.

Skyfall may be similar to the US SLAM missile of the 1960s
Skyfall may be similar to the US SLAM missile of the 1960s

Not much is known for certain about Skyfall's specifications, but it is likely launched using a solid-rocket booster, with the reactor kicking in at cruising speed like a ramjet. Its length is believed to be 39 ft (12 m), reduced to 30 ft (9 m) when in flight. Speed is likely to be in the high subsonic range of about 663 knots (760 mph, 1,225 km/h), though some experts think it might reach low supersonic velocity. Some reports have Putin claiming that the missile can reach hypersonic speeds in excess of Mach 5, though this is highly unlikely.

Though it is nuclear capable, there is no indication of the warhead yield. It is highly unlikely that it was armed during the test flights. Whether it will be operational in the near future – or ever – remains to be seen, with many Western experts saying the Skyfall may not be technologically viable or safe to deploy and may weigh as much as 24 tonnes.

Not to mention the geopolitical implications of fielding a weapon that is not only nuclear armed, but nuclear propelled. Just firing such a missile as part of a routine military exercise would be enough to spark international concern.

It presents a mental picture very similar to a hornet's nest meeting with a deftly wielded stick.

Source: Russian government

View gallery - 4 images
8 comments
8 comments
SteveMc
I find it highly unusual that Russia is able to dedicate the time, effort and massive funding towards producing a super-nuke at a time that they can’t supply adequate weapons or even food to their troops in Ukraine. Russia also seems to be buying their best drones from Iran or other overseas suppliers, obviously because they are not (able to be) making them in Russia. Surely drone tech is where the money and brainpower should be concentrated as that is where the tech in this war is centralised. Is there 3rd party evidence that this missile made this trip? The recent video footage that Putin spent a great deal of effort into broadcasting globally shows a rocket booster propelled missile leaving a conventional launcher. Nothing regarding its nuclear engine nor the marathon flight it took. The main video from Moscow is a rehearsed play, where his general wotsisname reads off a script to say how great and powerful everything is and an amazing success to boot. They also don’t really need to arm it with a warhead as such, because if they crash it or direct into a target, it’s probably going to die of radiation sickness anyway!
Live4ktm
The 2 strangest things about humans that perplex me are (1) the desire to go faster than others and (2) weapons that are designed to kill better, faster, etc. Lets face it: exceeding the speed limit increases your chances of death exponentially. Mass kill weapons also increase the risk of a horrible demise. Of course, this type of article is important b/c it silences the masses when new defense weapon programs are announced, often at enormous expense.
Rocky Stefano
@SteveMc - Don't believe anything you read. Most of the restrictions placed against Russia amount to nothing. The only reason they're still around is because they're extremely intelligent and can sell their tech to the Chinese, North Koreans and anyone willing to pay for it. Oh yeah, they have nukes. So if they really were on their knees, you know they'd fire off a tactical nuke to obliterate a Ukrainian position.
DaveWesely
There is no doubt Russia is good with propaganda. Not missiles.
Nobody
Yawn. There are so many missiles already that any counter measures are purely for publicity. Any missile claimed to avoid such counter measures is also for publicity. I grew up during the Cold War beginning with duck and cover along with bomb shelters. There will no doubt be a nuclear strike eventually. The starvation will be much worse than the radiation.
lon4
If military budgets around the planet were reallocated to help instead of hurt, we'd all be better off. Tired of Idiots?
SquareStem
@Rocky Stefano - "don't believe everything you read" - good advice..especially when it comes to Russian propaganda releases such as the one which seems to be the motivation for this story. And it's not credible to suggest that anyone would just "fire off a tactical nuke". China would likely disown them and NATO would likely respond much heavily and Russia can't even handle small amounts of 1990s NATO gear grudgingly deployed to Ukraine. We should all remember that Putin does enjoy tormenting soft Western leadership with his disinformation skills and he is very good at it.
Pat Douglas Barron
One of the main reasons for the cancellation of Project Pluto was the lethal levels of fission products that would be ejected from the nuclear reactor powered ramjet during operation. The meaning of the SLAM acronym eventually came to mean Slow Low And Messy...