Military

US Air Force taps JetZero to build prototype blended wing aircraft by 2027

US Air Force taps JetZero to build prototype blended wing aircraft by 2027
Rendering of a possible US Air Force blended-wing transport aircraft
Rendering of a possible US Air Force blended-wing transport aircraft
View 1 Image
Rendering of a possible US Air Force blended-wing transport aircraft
1/1
Rendering of a possible US Air Force blended-wing transport aircraft

Under a US$235-million contract, the US Air Force has tapped JetZero to build a prototype blended wing aircraft as a way to advance and demonstrate the capabilities of the technology that could lead to a new class of military transports.

Napoleon said that an army travels on its stomach, but today it's more accurate to say that it travels on a fleet of globe-spanning transport planes carrying ammunition, personnel, equipment, and all the necessities of life with an ease that would have been unimaginable a century ago.

The US Air Force estimates that transport aircraft consume 60% of its jet fuel. That's 1.2 billion gallons (4.5 billion liters) every year. To reduce this, the Air Force, along with NASA and the Defense Innovation Unit, is looking at blended wing aircraft as a possible solution.

Sort of a half-way point between a conventional airliner and a flying wing, a blended wing body reduces drag by at least 30%, and therefore increases efficiency by effectively making the fuselage into an airfoil that generates lift along with the wings. This reduces noise and allows for considerable fuel savings of up to 50% and a much larger payload space for passengers and cargo, while still being able to operate from existing airports.

The large interior space has been seen as a negative for civilian passenger service because of the lack of windows, but military applications would focus more on in-flight refueling tankers and carrying cargo. As to passengers, military personnel are already used to flying in what is essentially steerage without any windows.

In addition, by placing the engines atop the fuselage, greater efficiency can be gained while allowing the aircraft to operate from unpaved airstrips.

"Blended wing body aircraft have the potential to significantly reduce fuel demand and increase global reach," said Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall. "Moving forces and cargo quickly, efficiently, and over long distance (sic) is a critical capability to enable national security strategy."

The first prototype is expected to take to the air by 2027.

Source: US Air Force

7 comments
7 comments
yawood
Who cares about windows? I would love the additional space on a civilian aircraft. They could make the interior beautiful, and only a small percentage of passengers can sit at a window anyway.
JimFox
After years of CGI or simulations we will at last bring the concept to reality.
Military applications are sure (if successful) to lead to civilian adoption in some form. Congratulations to all concerned, Bravo!
paul314
@yawood: I agree -- perhaps with that fuel savings they could provide a little more open space, maybe even room for passengers to move around. Or sleeper berths that don't cost an arm an a leg. Some imagination in the interior layout would probably get you pretty close to the ratio of window-vicinity seats that you have now.
Unsold
Fighter jet pilots doing a double-take... As for windows, place a half-dozen webcams around the outside of the plane and feed them to the seatbacks.. No more bad seats.
JJF
Didn't Boeing already do that?
Kpar
Who needs windows? As mentioned by others here, only a minority of passengers get to sit by one, anyway. The use of TV screens located in the back of the seat in front of you (widely used in many airlines, now) can provide a view in any direction by providing cameras in front, back, top, sides and bottom of the aircraft (those are surprisingly cheap now, too), in addition to any other entertainment they wish.
MattII
As well as not being available to most passengers, windows also introduce structural weaknesses into an airframe, which requires more weight and complexity to compensate for.