Science

Platinum spike points to devastating asteroid impact 12,800 years ago

View 2 Images
A new study from South Africa adds more evidence to the hypothesis that an asteroid struck Earth 12,800 years ago
A map of the places where platinum spikes have been found at layers corresponding to the Younger Dryas – including Wonderkrater in South Africa, which is the site of the latest study
University of the Witwatersrand
A new study from South Africa adds more evidence to the hypothesis that an asteroid struck Earth 12,800 years ago

About 12,800 years ago, much of the Earth was plunged into a mini ice age, leading to the extinction of many megafauna species. What exactly caused this period, known as the Younger Dryas, is still up for debate, but one hypothesis blames an asteroid or comet impact. Now, South African researchers have found new evidence to support the idea, in the form of an unexplained spike of platinum in an ancient peat deposit.

The most widely-accepted explanation for the sudden cold snap – which lasted up to 1,300 years – is far less cinematic than an asteroid Armageddon. It’s believed that a huge pulse of cold water poured out of North America into the Atlantic Ocean, bringing vital water circulation mechanisms to a screeching halt.

With warmer waters no longer flowing up from the equator towards the Arctic, the ice sheets grew, and temperatures plummeted across the Northern Hemisphere. This drastic climate change could have unfolded in a matter of months, leading to a minor extinction event among megafauna and likely affecting human populations alive at the time as well.

But another explanation is gaining traction, although not without controversy. According to some scientists, an impact by an asteroid or comet could have had a similar effect. This idea isn’t without evidence either – previous work has found a layer of nanodiamonds in sediment dating back to around the beginning of the Younger Dryas.

These diamonds are only forged under intense pressure and temperature – conditions created during an impact – and the layer is consistent across much of the Northern Hemisphere, suggesting they rained down. One study even went as far as to suggest that carvings in an ancient temple told the tale of a comet collision at the time, but this is far from confirmed.

And now, new evidence may support the impact hypothesis. That’s the claim of a new study by South African researchers at the University of the Witwatersrand, the University of Johannesburg and the University of the Free State.

A map of the places where platinum spikes have been found at layers corresponding to the Younger Dryas – including Wonderkrater in South Africa, which is the site of the latest study
University of the Witwatersrand

The team drilled a core sample from a peat deposit at a site called Wonderkrater. This sample showed two intriguing things at around the 12,800-year mark. First, pollen trapped in the sample suggested a colder climate during the Younger Dryas. That lines up with the findings of other studies, but this is one of the few examples from the Southern Hemisphere.

But most curiously, the team found a spike in platinum levels at a time just before then. This could be explained as dust created after an impact, since some asteroids are rich in platinum. The team says that other platinum spikes have been spotted from around this time in places like Greenland, Eurasia, North America, Mexico and Chile.

“Our finding at least partially supports the highly controversial Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis (YDIH),” says Francis Thackeray, lead researcher on the study. “We seriously need to explore the view that an asteroid impact somewhere on Earth may have caused climate change on a global scale, and contributed to some extent to the process of extinctions of large animals at the end of the Pleistocene, after the last ice age.”

The research was published in the journal Palaeontologia Africana.

Source: University of the Witwatersrand

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Flipboard
  • LinkedIn
1 comment
aki009
It should also be noted that ice core samples suggest that there were multiple impacts over more than two decades. I keep wondering why anyone still considers this "highly controversial", except for some dinosaurs who are incapable of integrating new facts into their pet theories.