Architecture

Kilometer-tall skyscrapers to double as massive batteries

Kilometer-tall skyscrapers to double as massive batteries
SOM and Energy Vault Holdings envision the energy storage skyscrapers reaching a height of up to 1,000 m (3,280 ft), which would make them the tallest buildings in the world
SOM and Energy Vault Holdings envision the energy storage skyscrapers reaching a height of up to 1,000 m (3,280 ft), which would make them the tallest buildings in the world
View 2 Images
SOM and Energy Vault Holdings envision the energy storage skyscrapers reaching a height of up to 1,000 m (3,280 ft), which would make them the tallest buildings in the world
1/2
SOM and Energy Vault Holdings envision the energy storage skyscrapers reaching a height of up to 1,000 m (3,280 ft), which would make them the tallest buildings in the world
SOM and Energy Vault Holdings' ideas are still very early in the design stage
2/2
SOM and Energy Vault Holdings' ideas are still very early in the design stage

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM), the designer of the world's tallest building, Dubai's Burj Khalifa, has joined forces with Energy Vault Holdings to investigate the possibility of creating something even taller: huge 1-km [3,280-ft]-tall skyscrapers that would also function as gigantic gravity based energy storage systems.

The proposal features two particularly notable ideas. The first brings to mind research from the likes of Gravitricity and IISA, and would use excess energy – whether from renewable sources like solar or from a standard power grid – to raise a weight up to the top of a very tall skyscraper. When required, the weight is then released, allowing it to descend to the bottom of the building, harnessing the force of gravity to drive a generator.

"EVu is a superstructure tower design, which improves unit economics and enables GESS [gravity energy storage systems] integration into tall buildings through the use of a hollowed structure with heights over 300 meters [roughly 984 ft], and up to 1,000 meters [3,280 ft] tall," explains the press release by SOM and Energy Vault Holdings. "These structures will have the capacity to reach multi-GWh of gravity based energy storage to power not only the building itself but also adjacent buildings' energy needs. This innovative design which integrates leading GESS technology within superstructure building design and engineering will, for the first time in building construction and operation history, enable a carbon payback within accelerated timeframes of 3-4 years."

SOM and Energy Vault Holdings' ideas are still very early in the design stage
SOM and Energy Vault Holdings' ideas are still very early in the design stage

Alongside the EVu gravity system above, the team also proposes the so-called EVc system. This would function similarly but instead of a large weight, it would pump water to the top of the skyscraper then drop it to run turbines and produce power.

Though it might sound futuristic, we do already have quite a lot of similar systems in place for pumped-storage hydroelectric power stations. Water is released from a mountain or hill for example, generating electricity by spinning turbines as it flows downhill and providing more electricity when it's needed. When excess juice is again available, the water is pumped back up to the top, ready to start the process again.

Though the basic science behind both ideas is sound, the practical challenges are considerable, and include issues like being able to support all that extra weight, plus efficiency and general maintenance. Perhaps the largest stumbling blocks are the most tedious though: the amount of space it would take up plus all the moving parts could make building an office or residential skyscraper with this system simply economically unfeasible.

Take this one with a pinch of salt for now, then. However, there is some serious talent behind the collaboration, including Bill Baker, who co-created the Burj Khalifa, so we'll be interested to see if it goes anywhere.

Sources: SOM, Energy Vault Holdings

18 comments
18 comments
paleochocolate
Bring it on
paul314
This seems like a response to diminished demand for office space. If the volume occupied by all those extra elevators and weight storage could be profitably sold/rented, designers would focus on that. But instead, if you're hell-bent on building supertall buildings, this might be a plausible justification.
TechGazer
Gravity-based storage is height*weight. Is the material usage for this tower lower than that for a dam in some existing hills that would form part of a containment pool for the same storage capacity?

A tower only for energy storage is probably uneconomical, but if it's combined with vertical space for other human needs, such as high-density residential, commercial or agricultural purposes, maybe it's possible, but that seems unlikely.

To me, it seems like trying to justify building supertowers for bragging rights.
warmer
This seems like a great idea until you realize all of that weight at the top will cause havoc in an earthquake. To use it for power storage you have to create an incredible top heavy structure which will not do well when swaying. Putting this in a city seems like an incredible idealistic and stupid idea.
Rick O
I think that the water would be the way to go. Firstly because it could incorporate a decorative waterfall for occupants to watch (sealed off to prevent evaporation). Secondly because a weight that big that could potentially drop all at once would slam the ground and destroy the building and surrounding neighborhood. I'm sure they'll take precautions, but switching to water would be safer. It would still be a falling hazard, but it would disperse more as it fell.
MMMacKenzie
To achieve just 1 GWh of storage in a 1 km building, nevermind the 'multi-GWh' quoted here, would require a mass of 360,000 tonnes to be lifted to the top; that's half the mass of Taipei 101.
Nelson
It could also create energy concentrated light solar. I mirrors beming light to a hot snd at top: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concentrated_solar_power
David F
Alternatively, used a disused mine with a purpose built reservoir at ground level.
martinwinlow
Why not go the whole hog and make the weight *itself* the residential/office accommodation? A different view each morning!
Jennifer Page
Use the windows to generate electricity to backup a battery in each office that could be switched on when needed by the occupant for that office and adjacent corridor and stairwell. The technology is already proven. Efficient, cheap and safe.
Load More