Health & Wellbeing

Study finds dark chocolate dampens stress and inflammation, boosts memory and mood

Study finds dark chocolate dam...
New research has shed new light on the health benefits of dark chocolate that is rich in cacao
New research has shed new light on the health benefits of dark chocolate that is rich in cacao
View 1 Image
New research has shed new light on the health benefits of dark chocolate that is rich in cacao
New research has shed new light on the health benefits of dark chocolate that is rich in cacao

The health benefits of dark chocolate are well known, the cacao within it being a bountiful source of antioxidants that can protect against aging and disease. Two small new studies have sought to build on this knowledge by exploring how particular concentrations of cacao can boost cognitive function along with endocrine and cardiovascular health, finding that the darker the chocolate the brighter the results.

The study was carried out by researchers from California's Loma Linda University, and is claimed to be the first to look at the immediate health benefits of highly concentrated cacao when consumed in typical amounts.

"For years, we have looked at the influence of dark chocolate on neurological functions from the standpoint of sugar content – the more sugar, the happier we are," said Lee S. Berk, researcher in psychoneuroimmunology and food science at Loma Linda University and principal investigator on both studies. "This is the first time that we have looked at the impact of large amounts of cacao in doses as small as a regular-sized chocolate bar in humans over short or long periods of time, and are encouraged by the findings."

The first of the studies involved five subjects who were made to avoid all other high-antioxidant foods for 48 hours beforehand. They were then fed 48 g (1.7 oz) of dark chocolate heavy in cacao – a 70 percent concentration – daily over a period of eight days.

Their immune response and gene expression were then analyzed through blood samples and total RNA assays, both in the hours following and one week later, with the researchers keeping an eye out for pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. The researchers observed heightened T cell activation, cellular immune response and stimulation of genes associated with neural signaling and sensory perception, which are in turn linked with hyperplasticity – a state where the brain is believed to be more receptive to muscle memory and learning new skills.

The second study saw five healthy subjects again given 48 g of 70 percent cacao dark chocolate. Their brain activity was then monitored by placing electrodes at nine different scalp locations and measuring the electroencephalography response 30 minutes and 120 minutes after consumption. The team observed heightened activity and neuroplasticity in regions associated with behavioral and brain health.

"These studies show us that the higher the concentration of cacao, the more positive the impact on cognition, memory, mood, immunity and other beneficial effects," says Berk.

From here, the team plans to carry out further studies involving larger groups of participants to learn more about how the high concentrations of cacao play into brain-behaviour.

The two studies were published in the FASEB Journal here and here.

Source: Loma Linda University

This is one health food I wouldn't mind eating more of.
48 grams is about 8 squares of a family sized block. If you go to 85% to 90% cacao you can reduce the "dose" to 6 squares and more than halve your associated sugar intake.
Hmm . . . I wonder who funded the study?
S Michael
Yeah, who fund this study indeed.
Of COURSE dark chocolate is A Good Thing(tm). Dunno about this university in Rio Linda, though. Wombat56, the higher % cacao bars are downright ghastly bitter, so not at all satisfactory. I'll stick with 70%. Now to find a bar made with stevia instead of sugar. That'd be a great seller. Endangered Species makes a =very= tasty non-GMO 72% bar with tart cherries, but it's made with sugar.
The second sentence "Two small new studies ..." raises red flags about repeatability of the experiments. I remain skeptical of these findings until we see additional (statistically-valid) studies confirming their results. I see this as a case of journalists getting ahead of the science.