Energy

3D printing set to slash nuclear plant build times & costs

3D printing set to slash nuclear plant build times & costs
Demonstration units made using 3D-printed polymer forms
Demonstration units made using 3D-printed polymer forms
View 4 Images
Demonstration units made using 3D-printed polymer forms
1/4
Demonstration units made using 3D-printed polymer forms
Pouring concrete into the 3D-printed forms
2/4
Pouring concrete into the 3D-printed forms
Demonstration units and the printed form used to construct them
3/4
Demonstration units and the printed form used to construct them
The team behind the nuclear 3D printing project
4/4
The team behind the nuclear 3D printing project
View gallery - 4 images

Anticipating a boom in nuclear energy, the US Department of Energy’s Manufacturing Demonstration Facility (MDF) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory is using 3D-printing to speed up the building of power plants while bringing down costs.

Nuclear power in the West is undergoing a renaissance while aggressive construction programs continue in Asia and more are planned in Africa and other parts of the world. There are a number of reasons for this, but the pressure from projected power demands, especially from the boom in data centers, means that many plants of various designs will need to be built in years or even months instead of the decades of earlier generations.

Not only is speed a factor, so is cost. Nuclear plants are notoriously expensive to build, but it isn't the reactor that gobbles up the money. The real big numbers on the expense side of the ledger is the mundane concrete and steel civil engineering needed to house the nuclear tech and the electrical gear that make up over half the budget. This work also takes the most time to complete.

3D Nuclear

The bottom line: reduce the cost and speed of the engineering and the entire project benefits.

As part of the Generation IV Hermes Low-Power Demonstration Reactor project being built at the Oak Ridge campus in Tennessee in partnership with Kairos Power, MDF is testing the use of 3D-printed polymer forms to build the thick concrete bioshield used to contain the reactor vessel and isolate it from the outside environment. These forms are assembled around networks of steel rebar and concrete then poured into the mold.

According to Oak Ridge, the new polymer forms are fast to produce and can be reused as required. In addition, they are more precise than conventional steel or wooden molds, can be configured into complex shapes, and allow for more precise formations. This allows complex structures to be assembled onsite in a matter of days rather than weeks. In addition, reusable polymer molds can reduce the amount of timber needed for plant construction by 75%.

Pouring concrete into the 3D-printed forms
Pouring concrete into the 3D-printed forms

In addition to showing off the possibilities of 3D printing in nuclear construction, the Hermes reactor allows for extensive testing of the resulting structures, including their ability to maintain integrity under high load stresses.

"At ORNL, we’re showing that the future of nuclear construction doesn’t have to look like the past," said Ryan Dehoff, director of the Manufacturing Demonstration Facility. "We’re combining national lab capabilities with MDF’s legacy of taking big, ambitious swings – moonshots that turn bold ideas into practical solutions – to accelerate new commercial nuclear energy."

Source: ORNL

View gallery - 4 images
4 comments
4 comments
BarronScout
And here I thought one of the biggest expenses is/was all the regulations and permitting (and associated time frame) of getting a nuclear plant approved and built. If all the concrete and steel forms are a large part then maybe we should push for the assembly line reactors. Smaller scale and distributed generation.
Rick O
I feel like it would be better to extrude these pieces. The design looks consistent, and with a few molds you could crank them out to whatever length you needed, many times faster than 3D printing them. 3D printing has many good uses, I don't see this as one of them. Also, I think the plastic extrusions could be designed to be permanent structure that would look nicer, and protect the underlying concrete from weathering.
Techutante
Bigger plants are always more efficient, safer, and easier to manage. Honestly generating power is pretty easy these days, the problem in most areas is distribution and power loss over the lines. We'd save as much as 50% of our power if homes and businesses were better insulated, devices were less wasteful with heat, and power lines were more safely constructed and better shielded. But we've got along so far on "good enough,cheap enough" because business doesn't care about the long term, only the bottom line.
Also there's no plastic involved in this construction, it's all concrete. The polymer they are talking about is just molds which are removed after the printing is complete. A good concrete doesn't need plastic to protect it. Look at the roman constructions from 2000+ years ago. Most power plants only go for 60-100 years.
pete-y
Given that concrete formwork is a massive part of most modern building work then similar techniques could be adopted across the construction industry.. I can remember steel re-usable forming pans in use 50 years ago. To make formwork plastic, non-removable and aesthetic would look like a sensible step (so obvious that probably already adopted in some places).