Energy

France runs fusion reactor for record 22 minutes

France runs fusion reactor for record 22 minutes
The plasma chamber of the WEST Tokamak reactor
The plasma chamber of the WEST Tokamak reactor
View 3 Images
WEST, the Tokamak reactor run by the CEA
1/3
WEST, the Tokamak reactor run by the CEA
Plasma reached 50 million degrees in the WEST reactor
2/3
Plasma reached 50 million degrees in the WEST reactor
The plasma chamber of the WEST Tokamak reactor
3/3
The plasma chamber of the WEST Tokamak reactor
View gallery - 3 images

France has upped the ante in the quest for fusion power by maintaining a plasma reaction for over 22 minutes – a new record. The milestone was reached on February 12 at the Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA) WEST Tokamak reactor.

Achieving the dream of commercial fusion power is the Holy Grail of engineering and has been for 80 years. With a single gram of hydrogen isotopes yielding the energy equivalent of 11 tonnes of coal, a practical fusion reactor would hold the promise of unlimited, clean energy for humanity until the end of time.

Small wonder that billions have been invested by both government and industry in the quest to make fusion power a reality. However, while fusion is relatively easy to achieve in the heart of the sun or in a hydrogen bomb, creating a practical reactor that produces more energy than is put into it is another matter entirely.

WEST

The tricky bit isn't to get atoms to fuse. That's a fairly simple lab bench experiment. The problem is creating the right conditions where the fusion reaction is self-sustaining, with a net energy output. That means reaching temperatures of between 100 – 150 million °C (180 – 270 million °F), a pressure of five to 10 atmospheres at the point of reaction, and keeping a high-energy plasma stable for at least 10 seconds.

The CEA seems to have done considerably better than 10 seconds and gone 25% beyond what China achieved in January 2025 with 1,066 seconds. In the latest test, the WEST Tokamak held its reaction for 1,337 seconds.

The purpose of the test wasn't just to keep the plasma reaction going like a stage performer spinning plates. It was also to keep the reaction stable without the components in the reactor facing the plasma becoming eroded or polluted, or malfunctioning.

WEST, the Tokamak reactor run by the CEA
WEST, the Tokamak reactor run by the CEA

According to CEA, the next step will be to create even longer reactions that could amount to a combined time of several hours, with the temperature growing increasingly hotter. Though WEST will never become a true commercial reactor, the information gathered there will be used to improve more ambitious machines, like the giant International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) being built in the south of France.

"WEST has achieved a new key technological milestone by maintaining hydrogen plasma for more than twenty minutes through the injection of 2 MW of heating power," said Anne-Isabelle Etienvre, Director of Fundamental Research at the CEA. "Experiments will continue with increased power. This excellent result allows both WEST and the French community to lead the way for the future use of ITER."

Source: CEA

View gallery - 3 images
11 comments
11 comments
JS
You think the next generation will be running on fusion?
InfinityExperience
22 minutes is insane compared to the milliseconds we were at only a few years ago.
grey
It should be noted that the temperature is inside these things are significantly hotter than the core of the Sun. So it it is difficult to get them to fuse and the other part is trying to fuse them and have them also not destroy the thing that they're being used in because the plasma is constantly just shooting out particles that are very high energy and they degrade the thing that it's whatever they're contained in if they touch it and some of them can't be manipulated by magnets because they're electrically neutral.
Nuts
1. Fission uses much less radioactive stuff to run => its actually LESS dangerous 2. Fusion needs an actually insane environment to work, very complex infrastructure, very expensive to biuld and maintain.
Conclusion: Fission is far superior, but its the modern equivalent of the boogeyman because nobody actually 'knows' anythinf about either or the two😂
Brian M
Amazing improvement - Now it looks Fusion power is no longer the 'always 20 years away'. Now its just 19 years 354 days 23 hours and 59 seconds away......
michael_dowling
"...creating a practical reactor that produces more energy than is put into it is another matter entirely". Yes,that is the relevant detail that even plasma physicists frequently ignore in their glowing reports. I say this every time I comment on fusion research: Will Mother Nature pause climate change while we work out the kinks in producing the promised endless power fusion promises to give us? Or should we double down on what works,*fission* power?
mlynch002
Just think, If we only put as much time and energy into developing fission reactors. There are so many other safer and cheaper Fission reactor types that could be developed in a much shorter time period. LFTR and other molten salt reactors have a lot of promise. Unfortunately we put all our eggs into the PWR basket long ago. Nothing wrong with Fusion, but the time line is so long, we need a bridge technology, fission is that bridge.
kb-
Most comments here say we should focus on fission instead. No, France does both. Almost all of our electricity is from nuclear power plants, plus hydro, wind and solar. A tiny fraction is coal or natural gas. There's an excess of around 10 GW exported to Germany most days. A new fission reactor just started and more are scheduled. Molten salt reactors are in development. But we have to look ahead and make this fusion tech work.
veryken
But other approaches such as pulses by Helion completely sidestep the problems associated with sustained steady-state glorified by these record times. That's where my money will be at when they go IPO.
VicCherikoff
It all seems gearing up for an accident looking for a place to happen. Crazy really when the energy output can be quietly achieved for minimal input when a catalyst is used to fuse hydrogen and oxygen. HERO® is just such a catalyst and Star Scientific are able to produce heat at 700 degrees C in minutes and then drive a mini-turbine that can replace the monster dries in coal-fired power stations. The Star technology saves power companied up to $250m per annum in environmental controls and coal handling costs and the only by-product is pure water. Even this can be recycled and re-split to its component gases with a catalytic process that replaces electrolyser tech.
The HERO® heat system has been proven in industrial, process and urban heating applications and power is next on the list. As always, governments are moving at snails pace to pull their heads from the coal sands and actually support Australian innovations. Too many backhands from the fossil fuel industry.
We are definitely NOT the Clever Country when it comes to the Fools with the Rules.
Load More