Environment

Long-life 'air motors' show promise in marine testing

Long-life 'air motors' show promise in marine testing
The swimming pool test rig, in which variables such as air tank capacity, pressure and discharge rate were explored
The swimming pool test rig, in which variables such as air tank capacity, pressure and discharge rate were explored
View 2 Images
The swimming pool test rig, in which variables such as air tank capacity, pressure and discharge rate were explored
1/2
The swimming pool test rig, in which variables such as air tank capacity, pressure and discharge rate were explored
A closer look at the pneumatic drive system
2/2
A closer look at the pneumatic drive system

While battery-electric ferry boats may be more eco-friendly and require less maintenance than their diesel-burning counterparts, they're still not perfect. That's why scientists are now looking into powering small ferries using nothing but compressed air.

One drawback of battery-electric watercraft lies in the fact that their batteries take a relatively long time to charge.

Some people also think that for their size and weight, those batteries have a low energy density. And what's more, batteries lose their ability to hold a charge over time, and ultimately have to be disposed of.

With these problems in mind, Prof. Abdul Hai Alami and colleagues at the United Arab Emirates' University of Sharjah recently turned their attention to compressed air.

The scientists created a pneumatic drive system consisting of two 40-liter compressed air tanks that are connected to a 6-hp "air motor," which is in turn coupled to a propeller via a steel shaft. As air is released from the tanks at a pressure of 200 bar (2,901 psi) it causes the motor – and thus also the propeller – to rapidly rotate. Gear boxes can be added to adjust the speed and direction of thrust.

A closer look at the pneumatic drive system
A closer look at the pneumatic drive system

In swimming pool tests, the system was installed on a three-to-four-passenger PVC boat which was made to resemble the Abra ferries commonly used in the United Arab Emirates.

A poolside-located device known as a load cell was connected to the rear end of the boat via steel cables. When the drive system was fired up, its thrust was measured by the pulling force it exerted on the load cell. As a control, the same boat was also fitted with a similar-capacity electric motor powered by a conventional battery.

It was ultimately found that the pneumatic setup was able to deliver 6% more propulsive force, along with an operational range comparable to that of a battery-electric system with a 12-volt/18-Ah battery pack. What's more, the researchers estimated that the pneumatic system's annual carbon footprint would be 307 kg (677 lb) lower than that of an equivalent battery-electric system.

That smaller footprint is due in part to a proposed system in which dockside photovoltaic panels would be used to power a compressor that would pressurize the tanks – no fossil-fuel-based energy sources would be required. The idea is that in the time it took for one batch of passengers to disembark and another batch to board, the tanks would be recharged and ready to go.

All of that being said, the pneumatic drive system would initially be limited to use in fairly short-run ferries, and perhaps also in recreational watercraft utilized near the shore.

"The depletion of the tanks systematically decreases the amount of energy available, since starting from a tank at 200 bar provides higher energy quality than when this pressure decreases to 100 bar or 50 bar," Prof. Alami tells us. "Thus venturing far from a charging station might be risky at this early stage of development."

A paper on the study was recently published in the journal Ocean Engineering.

Source: University of Sharjah via EurekAlert

12 comments
12 comments
jimbo92107
Until somebody invents an air pressure capacitor.
jsopr
A 12V 18Ah LiFePO4 battery costs $50, weighs 5 pounds, is 4x4x6 inches, and delivers its full 250W until almost exhausted. It's really hard to beat a battery, but this approach comes nowhere near.
Andy
Would be interesting to know options for keeping the tanks at 200 bar until exhausted maybe a piston and crank to lower the capacity of the tank but keep the pressure up for more of the capacity?
Steve Pretty
The basic infrastructure for this is already widely deployed. 200 Atm compressed air is what is used for scuba diving. So this technology might well appeal to dive schools to run inflatable tenders or small near shore dive boats. If the pneumatic motor is designed to run at 50 Atm, a simple regulator will maintain constant power output for most of the cylinder capacity. Again, this is how scuba cylinders work, with a first stage regulator. Larger dive schools will have banks of compressed air reservoirs for rapid charging of user cylinders. You fill from the reservoir with least air first, and top up from cylinders with increasingly higher capicity.
Brian M
Probably not the most practical system, stack of problems to overcome, from keeping the tanks cool while rapidly charging (apparently its a bit hot out there as well).
The weight of the tanks might end up being similar to batteries, how well will the tanks standup to repeated pressure cycling, what would be their life?

How efficient is the solar->compressed air conversion compared to the latest solar to hydrogen or synth fuel conversions?

Maybe I'm bit biased. As a diver with own tank filling compressor, always nervous when using, all those high pressures just ready to go bang - scary!


alan c
Solar to compressed air is not as efficient as solar to battery, and most of the solar energy would be wasted as heat of compression. They clearly don't run that industrial air motor (which is not as efficient as an electric motor) at 200bar so the air in the cylinder (at ambient temperature) has to go through a pressure regulator which would probably freeze without reheating.
TechGazer
Biased reporting. They say it's wonderful because it uses solar panels to "charge" ... while assuming that batteries would use fossil-fuel generated power. That sort of greenwashing gives me a very negative impression of the rest of the article.
Seasherm
Air power like this is likely going to be part of the mix going forward. This is so much more practical that hydrogen, for example. We are using stored compressed air underground for grid power. The question is, will the energy density be good enough for mobile use. On my ship we maintained large air bottle at 30 bar for starting engines. They are using higher pressures here, much like modern EV's are using higher voltages. Likely a niche product, but I'll bet they do some interesting stuff with it.
Seasherm
Maintaining higher pressure for longer can be accomplished using a cascade system of bottles. It gives some extension of higher pressures.
mediabeing
Surprised, I was, to see nothing about working in regenerative braking. Braking should cut in a compressor to slow the vehicle and charge an air tank.
Load More