Space

First interstellar object may have come from a binary star

First interstellar object may ...
Artist’s impression of ‘Oumuamua
Artist’s impression of ‘Oumuamua
View 1 Image
Artist’s impression of ‘Oumuamua
1/1
Artist’s impression of ‘Oumuamua

The first known object to come from outside our Solar System is giving up clues as to where it came from. New research led by Dr Alan Jackson at the Centre for Planetary Sciences at the University of Toronto Scarborough indicate there's a high probability that interstellar asteroid 'Oumuamua (1I/2017 U1) came from a binary star system containing at least one hot, massive star.

First detected on October 19, 2017 by the University of Hawaii's Pan-STARRS 1 telescope on Haleakala and plotted as part of a NASA survey to identify near-Earth objects, 'Oumuamua (Hawaiian for "Scout") was initially thought to be a comet. However, its lack of comet-like activity and later analysis of its orbit and light curve indicated that it was an asteroid that had been flying through interstellar space for hundreds of million of years before briefly passing through our system.

After weeks of intense scrutiny, it was determined that 'Oumumua is a rocky spindle measuring about 230 × 35 × 35 m (800 × 100 × 100 ft) with an average diameter of about 110 m (360 ft) and is rotating in such a manner that it likely had a violent origin. Its trajectory had it traveling in an open-ended hyperbolic arc with an eccentricity of 1.2 and at an extreme angle to the ecliptic as it traveled at a velocity of 26 km/s (59,000 mph, 95,000 km/h). Observations established that it's of natural origin and has been drifting through interstellar space for millions of years as it was bombarded by cosmic rays, reducing its surface to a layer of dense organic compounds.

But the real mystery is, where did it come from? Backtracking its trajectory to the constellation of Lyra indicates that it's been circling the galaxy several times since it was ejected from its home system, with our Solar System being the first it has encountered. Exactly which system it came from may never be determined, but according to Jackson, the most probable one is a binary star system.

The Sun is a single star system, but there are many systems made up of two or more stars orbiting one another about a common focus. Jackson's team examined how efficient a binary star is at ejecting objects and correlated this with the number of binaries in the Galaxy. What they discovered was that objects are more likely to be ejected from binary stars as the mass of each companion yanks any planets or other objects out of their proper orbits – much in the way that Jupiter's gravity dislodges asteroids and comets and sends them hurtling into the inner Solar System.

"It's really odd that the first object we would see from outside our system would be an asteroid, because a comet would be a lot easier to spot and the Solar System ejects many more comets than asteroids," says Jackson.

In addition, the team determined that at least one of the binary companions is a hot, high-mass star because these have more rocky objects orbiting close in. They also believe that 'Oumuamua was probably erected during a time when planets were forming around the stars. The hope is that continuing analysis of the data gleaned from the interstellar wanderer will give new insight into other systems.

"The same way we use comets to better understand planet formation in our own Solar System, maybe this curious object can tell us more about how planets form in other systems," says Jackson.

The study as published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

Source: Royal Astronomical Society

3 comments
Bob
Wait, if this is a spindle 800 x 100 x100 feet how does it get an average diameter of 360 feet? Also a lot of assumptions are going on as well. Binary system? Are you sure? This is the first solar system it has entered. How do they know? What if it came from our own solar system as a comet that was ejected at an odd angle by a close encounter with Jupiter or Saturn? There is way too much speculation going on here.
Mark K.
Hmmmm. Binary systems are more likely to eject objects as the mass of each companion yanks any planets or other objects out of their proper orbits.
Hmmmm. We have a lot of objects in our outer solar system that seem to be yanked out of their proper orbits. I wonder how long are they going to keep saying we are in a single star system?
Ralf Biernacki
"Observations ESTABLISHED that it is of natural origin" (emphasis mine). If you go to the source, what observations actually established is that it does not currently transmit in the radio spectrum. Regarding that limited observation as conclusive proof that it is a natural object is as preposterously lacking in scientific rigor as the whole SETI crowd. Think Maslov principle: if the only tool you have is a hammer, you will treat every problem as if it were a nail. If the only tool you have is a radiotelescope, you will believe that the only criterion of identifying aliens is that they direct radio transmissions at us. Now, this thing is evidently long dead, and battered into a lump by the cosmic ocean---no question about it. But this tells nothing about its provenance. Its elongated cylinder shape, high metal content, non-cometary nature, and unusual trajectory are intriguing, even if it does not beam alien radio sitcoms at us. But space exploration is still done by bureaucracies, so there is no chance of a quick scramble to send a probe before this object gets truly out of range. And thus these grapes are clearly sour, and Oumuamua is "obviously" just a natural rock.