Materials

Bio-inspired "plasmonic paint" could make regular paint a thing of the past

Bio-inspired "plasmonic paint" could make regular paint a thing of the past
These metal butterflies all sport a coat of the butterfly-inspired plasmonic paint
These metal butterflies all sport a coat of the butterfly-inspired plasmonic paint
View 1 Image
These metal butterflies all sport a coat of the butterfly-inspired plasmonic paint
1/1
These metal butterflies all sport a coat of the butterfly-inspired plasmonic paint

Traditional paint gets it color from synthetic pigments, which fade over time and aren't very eco-friendly. There may soon be a better alternative, though, in the form of a paint which incorporates color-producing nanostructures.

We've previously heard about technologies that mimic the manner in which the wings of certain butterflies display such vibrant colors. Those wings forgo natural pigments for nanoscale structures which reflect/scatter and absorb ambient white light in such a way that it's seen as colors such as bright red, blue or green.

Led by Prof. Debashis Chanda, scientists at the University of Central Florida have replicated that phenomenon in an experimental "plasmonic paint."

Along with a commercial binder liquid (a polymer resin and isopropyl alcohol), it incorporates tiny mirror-like flakes of aluminum which are coated in even tinier particles of aluminum oxide. Depending on the size and spacing of those nanoparticles, the flakes appear to be either cyan, magenta or yellow. Various paint hues can be produced by mixing the different primary colors of flakes in different ratios.

According to Chanda, the aluminum used in the paint is much less harmful to the environment than the synthetic pigments which are currently utilized in conventional paint. Additionally, whereas those pigments gradually lose their ability to absorb photons over the years – resulting in a duller appearance – the nanostructured flakes should produce the same brilliant colors indefinitely.

What's more, thanks to its large area-to-thickness ratio, very little of the plasmonic paint is needed to effectively coat a surface. For instance, the university states that only about 3 lb (1.4 kg) of the paint would be needed to coat a 747 jumbo jet, whereas over 1,000 lb (454 kg) of conventional paint would be required to do the same job. This officially makes the plasmonic paint the lightest paint in the world.

Finally, because the paint reflects the entire infrared light spectrum, it absorbs very little heat. As a result, underlying surfaces reportedly stay 25 to 30 ºF (14 to 17 ºC) cooler than if they were coated with traditional paint of the same color.

"Over 10% of total electricity in the US goes toward air conditioner usage," said Chanda. "The temperature difference plasmonic paint promises would lead to significant energy savings. Using less electricity for cooling would also cut down carbon dioxide emissions, lessening global warming."

The lab-produced plasmonic paint is currently more expensive to make than mass-produced pigmented paint. It is hoped that will cease to be the case, once the technology is scaled up to commercial production levels.

The research is described in a paper that was recently published in the journal Science Advances.

Source: University of Central Florida

5 comments
5 comments
PAV
If they can offer this at the price point of current paint they should be able to corner the market. I wonder how it holds up to moisture and cleaning.
TechGazer
"As a result, underlying surfaces reportedly stay 25 to 30 ºF (14 to 17 ºC) cooler than if they were coated with traditional paint of the same color." That depends on the colour. Any paint other than white is absorbing other parts of the spectrum. If you want to stay cool, sacrifice your artistic side and choose white. If the application absolutely demands a certain colour, then this new paint would reduce heat absorption.
ljaques
Well, unless it's 333x more expensive than regular paint, it should sell well since you use so much less paint.
Jon Zax
Another savings would occur if repainting was significantly reduced.
James Salkeld
While it sounds like a neat idea I would question whether Chanda is over hyping thier product. The most toxic part of most modern paints is the binder and or carrier not the pigment and aluminum would be more toxic then most of the carbon based synthetic pigments or relatively inverter titanium white used in paints today. I also suspect covering anything with tiny mirrors even if it's not based on this tech will reduce the energy absorbed.