Military

DARPA christens dagger-like, crewless ocean warship

DARPA christens dagger-like, crewless ocean warship
USX-1 Defiant
USX-1 Defiant
View 3 Images
Ship sponsor Mattie Hanley christening Defiant
1/3
Ship sponsor Mattie Hanley christening Defiant
USX-1 Defiant
2/3
USX-1 Defiant
USX-1 Defiant
3/3
USX-1 Defiant
View gallery - 3 images

DARPA's autonomous Unmanned Surface Vessel (USV), the USX-1 Defiant, took a major step toward operational status as a bottle of spirits was broken over its bow at the Everett Ship Repair in Everett, Washington on August 11, 2025.

Since 2020, DARPA has been pushing its No Manning Required Ship (NOMARS) program to create a new class of medium-size warship that can operate autonomously at sea for up to a year without human supervision or intervention.

It's not an easy task. Science fiction notwithstanding, producing such a vessel requires a blank sheet approach with everything being designed from the keel up, leaving out all of the gubbins required for a crew. That means no gangways, no crew spaces, no ventilation, no stores, no controls, and no bridge.

Defiant

The result is a ship that looks surprisingly small and dagger-like, with just enough beam to accommodate engines, sensor platforms, and weapons. In the case of Defiant, you get a craft 180 ft (55 m) long and displacing 240 tonnes that can do 20 knots (23 mph, 37 km), reducing to 15 knots (17 mph, 27 km/h) after a year at sea.

Along with the lightness and sleekness, the systems aboard Defiant are more like those of a deep-space probe, with an emphasis on reliability and redundancy that allows it to operate at sea for up to a year without human intervention. It can even refuel itself autonomously. Where a conventional ship would have technicians aboard for repairs and routine maintenance, Defiant can tolerate wear and tear on its system and can switch to backups as needed.

USX-1 Defiant
USX-1 Defiant

Another aspect of the design is that it's highly simplified, so it can be manufactured quickly and refitted in any port that can handle yacht, tug, and workboat customers. This means that in the near future, autonomous ships can be deployed in large numbers to act as force multipliers for the US Navy, take over boring routine duties like sub hunting or harbor patrols, and carry out missions in hostile waters without risking human lives.

After completing sea trials, Defiant will be transferred to the Navy's Unmanned Maritime Systems Program Office (PMS 406).

Ship sponsor Mattie Hanley christening Defiant
Ship sponsor Mattie Hanley christening Defiant

"Defiant is a tough little ship and defies the idea that we cannot make a ship that can operate in the challenging environment of the open ocean without people to operate her," said NOMARS Program Manager Greg Avicola. "While relatively small, Defiant is designed for extended voyages in the open ocean, can handle operations in sea state 5 with no degradation and survive much higher seas, continuing operations once the storm passes. She’s no wider than she must be to fit the largest piece of hardware and we have no human passageways to worry about."

Source: DARPA

View gallery - 3 images
6 comments
6 comments
paul314
I hope they've got at least some passageways and ventilation. Otherwise the electronics and other systems are going to be unhappily hot and impossible to maintain. Or do you just pull big chunks of the ship out and take them apart on land?
BarronScout
I don't want to be alarmist, but I feel the "SkyNet" moment is getting closer....
I think anything autonomous vehicle with armament requires an operator position or override hardwired (no software only option). I can see two distinct nightmare scenarios right off the bat:
1) Obvious SkyNet reference - "medium-size warship that can operate autonomously at sea for up to a year without human supervision or intervention." Right there we have to worry about the software (AI?) making a decision that endangers us. IE: Eliminate carrier group that is patrolling contested waters to prevent conflict - launches missiles to sink multiple war ships and starts regional conflict.
2) Hackers from one of several sources (Foreign power or even radical change group) manage to gain control and change operating parameters. Or just end up taking remote control of the vessel. Imagine China or Russia having it attack one of their ships then blame USA using that as rational to start a conflict. Or worse a fleet of these things just turn around and start sinking NATO allied ships.
Karmudjun
My only concern with autonomous ships controlled by either a central location (Pentagon) or a local flagship (surface warfare group XXXX) is that the communication between "Master" and "Slave" is vulnerable to interference, misdirection, or complete takeover by skilled hackers. I know the ship builders and fitters have dealt with the access & ventilation issues - that is a non sequitur if I ever saw one. While I cannot assure anyone regarding "SkyNet", Elon does have worldwide electronic capability and is just crazy enough....
veryken
Yet another step towards the dystopian future depicted in all those sci-fi movies.
SkepticalMan
DARPA has reinvented the narcosub! Jk but you have to admit to some cosmetic similarities.
fen
the big problem is no one is afraid to blow up drones. Even Iran will take shots at them. The USA is walking itself down a road where their drone ships are gonna cost 500 million each and be blown up regularly and there will be no pushback to start a war when they are blown up because no lives were lost.
So if you make weapons they are amazing as they need to be replaced all the time, and you get the wages of the crew in maintaing them. But for the security of your country, they are not great. China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, all will not hesitate to blow up a drone, where they wouldnt date take out a manned one.