The US Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) has demonstrated the ability of air-dropped bombs to sink ships with the effectiveness of a submarine-launched torpedo at a fraction of the cost. On April 28, an F-15E Strike Eagle fighter sank a full-scale vessel in the Gulf of Mexico using a single 2,000-lb (907-kg) "Quicksink" GBU-31 Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM).
Attacking ships with bombs isn't new. In 1921, US Army Brigadier General Billy Mitchell started a revolution in naval warfare when he staged a test bomber attack that sank a captured German battleship. However, sinking a ship, especially a large one with double hulls and watertight compartments, isn't simply a matter of dropping explosives on the deck, but of placing the charge where it can do the most damage with a single shot.
This is the reason the anti-ship weapon of choice is a submarine-launched heavy torpedo like the US Type 46, which can deliver 96.8 lb (43.9 kg) of high-explosive PBXN-103 to the target. Ideally, the fatal spot is a point directly under the keel, though a slight distance from the hull. When the torpedo reaches this, a magnetic, timer, or remote control detonator sets off the charge and generates a shockwave that breaks the ship's back, sending it to the bottom.
The downside is that submarines aren't always available at short notice and each tin fish costs a sobering US$1.2 million per shot. As an alternative, the AFRL and Eglin Air Force Base's Integrated Test Team set up the Quicksink Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD) to test a potentially more cost effective and flexible alternative based on the JDAM system.
Put simply, a JDAM is a kit that turns an unguided "dumb" gravity bomb into a guided precision munition. It consists of a collar that goes around the main body of the bomb and a tail unit for guidance that used GPS and an inertial guidance system.
For Quicksink, the JDAM package has been modified with a new seeker unit and Weapon Open Systems Architecture (WOSA) to provide the needed precision to sink a target ship at a cost of only $300,000 per round. In addition, the system would allow for more strikes to be fielded against stationary or moving targets over a much larger area than a submarine could manage in the same timeframe.
"The development of this technology is critical to maintaining US technological superiority and addressing defined national security challenges," said Gerry Tighe, OUSD(R&E) oversight executive for the JCTD. "This successful demonstration represents an important milestone."
The video below shows the Quicksink in action.
Source: AFRL
Next a 2k lb for this tiny ship? Few ships are armored so anything over 500lbs is overkill. Better to have 4 500lb than 1 2k lb..
And don't they already have these?
An F15 can take on a SAM attack and win and they can drop these from 45k' too.
I was 200' in my boat under an SR-71 as it did an S turn lining up with the Boca Chica Naval Airbase/Key West was a rather beautiful sight. Interestingly it didn't land but was flying under Cuban radar coming in and at the end of the runway turned up on it's tail and went near straight up like the F14s there did making the Russians/Cubans think it was just another F14.