Military

Watch: USAF's Quicksink weapon tears a ship in half in seconds

Watch: USAF's Quicksink weapon tears a ship in half in seconds
Quicksink doing some sinking
Quicksink doing some sinking
View 4 Images
Quicksink doing some sinking
1/4
Quicksink doing some sinking
Quicksink installed on a fighter plane
2/4
Quicksink installed on a fighter plane
Diagram of Quicksink
3/4
Diagram of Quicksink
Image showing the damage caused by a single Quicksink round
4/4
Image showing the damage caused by a single Quicksink round
View gallery - 4 images

The US Air Force has released video of a ship being ripped in half to demonstrate its new Quicksink weapon, which turns an inexpensive dumb bomb into a precision anti-ship missile – and which lives up to its name in spectacular fashion.

Modern weapon systems are amazingly effective, with the ability for a single small warhead to take out a small target that one time would have required a carpet bombing raid or a heavy artillery barrage. Unfortunately, they're also expensive and with the current geopolitical situation suggesting a return to large-scale peer-to-near-peer conflicts, cheaper alternatives that are easier to stockpile have become more attractive.

One example of this is anti-ship weapons. The go-to weapon for this is a torpedo like the US Type 46 torpedo that can deliver 96.8 lb (43.9 kg) of high-explosive PBXN-103 to the target and destroy it by exploding under its keel, breaking the ship's back.

QUICKSINK

Unfortunately, there are a couple of problems. For one thing, the type 46 costs US$1.2 million per shot. For another, firing one gives away the presence of the attacking submarine. Then there's the fact that even the fastest submarine has a limited ability to intercept targets over a large area.

With the US and its allies facing the problem of keeping the peace in the huge Indo-Pacific region, the ideal solution would be a weapon that can be deployed quickly over long distances and doesn't cost an arm and a leg. That means an anti-ship weapon that can be delivered by the US Air Force.

Being developed by the Air Force Research Laboratory Munitions Directorate at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, Quicksink is designed to be carried by both fighter planes and bombers. It's essentially a variant of the JDAM system that turns dumb iron bombs into smart munitions by providing a kit that straps onto the bomb to give it airfoils and a guidance system. Quicksink is similar to a variant for delivering sea mines to precise locations except that this one has a laser sensor that straps to the bomb's nose that allows it to zero in on surface vessels that are either stationary or moving.

Diagram of Quicksink
Diagram of Quicksink

Using a modular, open-architecture design based on existing technology, Quicksink is able to deliver the lethality of a torpedo at a cost of only US$300,000 per round. Using a stealth fighter or bomber to deliver it as a standoff weapon, it can strike more targets over a greater range than any submarine can.

One drawback that some have pointed out is that as a glide bomb, Quicksink has a flight range of only 40 nm (46 miles, 74 km) and that this makes the attacking aircraft vulnerable to anti-aircraft defenses. However, Quicksink is designed to be dropped from stealthy aircraft flying at high speed and altitude. More importantly, its intended targets are unaccompanied ships that may be carrying contraband or are acting as disguised missile platforms that will not have the defenses of a warship.

During July's RIMPAC SINKEX in the Gulf of Mexico, a B-1 bomber sank the junked MV Monarch Countess with a Quicksink munition, bringing us the remarkable footage above. This is not the first time Quicksink has been demonstrated, but the exercise saw it being tested against other anti-ship weapons and in collaboration with participants from Australia, Malaysia, the Netherlands, the Republic of Korea, and the US Air Force, Army and Navy.

"The development of this technology helps deliver technological superiority to ensure the United States can defend our interests, maintain freedom of action, and seize the initiative over large maritime areas," said Colonel Matthew Caspers, Air Force Research Laboratory, Munitions Directorate Director.

Source: AFRL

View gallery - 4 images
10 comments
10 comments
WONKY KLERKY
Errrrrr, I say chaps etc:
Wot about:
Bigger wings - It'll fly further.
A fan/jet on the back (&/or the front/&/or the wings) - It'll fly further.
edjudy
. . . annnnnnd then, Wonky, its cost will be back up to over a million per unit . . .
Username
300K seems much to expensive for some basic electronics and a wack of explosives.
Karmudjun
One might hope that Colonel Matthew Caspers and his staff have covered all the obvious and have developed this device for stealth and ease of use, not for long distance deployment. The larger the wings and the further something flies, the greater the chance to track it. If you can track it, a rapid fire weapon can obliterate it. Besides, wings inherently induce some drag - larger wings = more drag. This looks like a great achievement in sub-sonic weaponry.
BMC2
"With the US and its allies facing the problem of keeping the peace in the huge Indo-Pacific region..."

Really? Is that what the US and its allies are doing? Is that why the weapon is being developed?

What you've written is propaganda. Why doesn't New Atlas stick with the facts surrounding various weapons/new technologies/whatever without the speculation as to the reasons why whatever device is being developed because you – the collective 'you' – apparently don't know or particularly care.
Adrian Akau
Perhaps it could be made less expensive.
Rusty
Pretty cool, but I'd also like to see it hit a "warship" not a cargo vessel. Warships are usually fitted with extra steel to help them
survive an attack.
Eggbones
@BMC2 I totally agree! There wouldn't be so much unrest in the region if there were fewer countries trying to "keep the peace".
Gearhead
Amazing & spectacular to watch a ship being smashed like that, but ships usually have people in them too, right? Watch the bit between 18-35 seconds & imagine that's you. How do you feel about it now?
Peter
@BMC2. Completely agree. New Atlas needs to stop being biased and needs to exercise more impartiality in these kind of articles. The 'keeping the peace' and protecting democracy excuses that the US and it's vassals keep using to justify their criminal actions isn't fooling anyone with more than one brain cell.