Military

Watch: US Army quadcopter takes down drone with Claymore mine

Watch: US Army quadcopter takes down drone with Claymore mine
Quadcopter with Claymore (right) engages SkyRaider drone
Quadcopter with Claymore (right) engages SkyRaider drone
View 2 Images
British Army Sergeant setting up Claymore mine during NATO exercise in Poland
1/2
British Army Sergeant setting up Claymore mine during NATO exercise in Poland
Quadcopter with Claymore (right) engages SkyRaider drone
2/2
Quadcopter with Claymore (right) engages SkyRaider drone

A US Army quadcopter engaged and destroyed a winged drone during an exercise at Fort Rucker, Alabama. These days, that's not such a rare occurrence, but this one is different – it's the first that used a Claymore landmine strapped to the quad.

As reports from the Ukraine war show, taking a drone and bolting a Claymore mine to it isn't new. Both Ukrainian and Russian forces have done so on many occasions, but these have been to turn the drones into steerable cluster bombs to attack personnel on the ground.

Given that a Claymore is a curved block of C4 explosive with a layer of epoxy on the front embedded with about 700 ball bearings, the mine is a small, highly lethal munition. It's simple to set up and can be fired manually or by a trip wire to spray steel shrapnel is a 60-degree arc to a distance of 330 ft (100 m). It's so effective that it and imitations have been a mainstay of many military forces for almost 70 years as a defensive or area denial weapon.

Today, as part of the US Army's Project Shank, the Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Armaments Center (DEVCOM AC) is looking at ways to develop small, inexpensive, portable drones that can be controlled by a single field operator. One result of this has been an FPV drone armed with a Claymore mine.

Recently, over Tabernacle Field at Fort Rucker, a winged 7.7-lb (3.5-kg) SkyRaider drone was deployed, followed by the FPV quadcopter controlled by CW2 Nathan Shea, a UAS operations officer with the Pennsylvania National Guard. Under Shea's control, the quad hunted for and then pursued the SkyRaider. When in range, the fire command was given and the Claymore detonated.

The result was what can safely be called overkill, like hitting a pigeon at point blank range with buckshot – only with a lot fewer feathers. The SkyRaider was knocked out of the air and contact was momentarily lost with the quadcopter due to the massive recoil, though the little aircraft did survive and communications were reestablished.

The ultimate goal is to improve upon and integrate lessons learned from the Russian invasion of Ukraine and Middle Eastern conflicts, and incorporate these into US and NATO tactics.

Source: US Army

9 comments
9 comments
YourAmazonOrder
"Front Toward Enemy." You know... that shrapnel (steel balls) doesn't just stop at the drone. There's a 60 degree cone of death in front of that thing, that extends 300 feet. But, that's on the ground. When fired from above, that 300 feet becomes, "the drone's altitude," and the cone will start out strong, traveling 300 feet, then curve downward as it loses momentum due to air friction. So... yeah. Ground troops will get some, as will anything else.
guzmanchinky
How the quadcopter survived that is maybe the most amazing thing about this!
Nobody
Looked like the quad copter went down as well. I could imagine most drones being faster than a quad copter.
Username
I find it odd that a quad with a claymore would catch a winged drone.
vince
Why not flapjacks (pancake) style loading a quadcooter with several c4 laden bombs and drop tem over bad guys sites? If a quad could manage 5 QEDs then 100 drove attack could prove devastating.
Brian M
@YourAmazonOrder Yes you are right, although, sadly, that might be viewed as a side benefit in some conflicts and definitely if used over enemy or enemy occupied territory.
However might be breaking rules of war/ combat if any civilians/non-combatants likely to be in the areas its non-discimantory although doubt that would stop warring parties much these days. The US and those claiming to follow the rules really should not be looking at this as a usably weapon, only as information on how to defeat such weapons. For drone defence it needs to be more of a precise take down.
michael_dowling
They should have asked the Ukrainians if that was a practical response to drones. I can guess what the answer would be.
christopher
$4,000 quadcopter downed a $100 fixed-wing drone? Not anybody's idea of a win, not least because: a) real drones like that go too fast (TEN *times* faster!) for any quadcopter to actually catch in real life b) the quad would have to be there before the drone arrived - but again - drones go too fast to launch and be ready c) a no-brainer firmware update so the drone doesn't fly a perfectly straight line, and no quadcopter is going to hit it anyhow. d) they never come one-at-a-time.
Someone got their news mixed up?: "SkyRaider" are not fixed-wing, they're quadcopters, (which can go about 31mph), and the new Shahed's go 500mph...
ReservoirPup
@christopher: (from GoogleAI) Newer, jet-powered Shahed variants can reach speeds of 400–600 km/h (250-370 mph), not 500 mph, while the original piston-engine Shahed-136's approximately 185 km/h (115 mph) speed. The latter is far more widely used than the former. From GoogleAI again - FPV drones vary widely in speed, with typical race and freestyle drones reaching 80-130 mph (130-210 km/h), while specialized record-breaking drones can exceed 300 mph (480 km/h). So not all of your numbers are right. The main weakness of your argument is the point of this exercise though: it does make a lot of sense as a testbed, not the best and final solution! The article clearly states this in its title.