The natural world is a constant source of inspiration for scientists and engineers. The latest biologically influenced innovation comes from a team of German researchers who developed a new type of stronger cement inspired by nanostructures found in sea urchin spines.
The team was inspired by the structural resilience of sea urchin spines, which are primarily made up of a brittle material called calcite. Yet despite the nature of calcite, the spines are incredibly durable because of a nano-level, brick-and-mortar style architecture.
It was discovered that sea urchin spines are so tough because the crystalline blocks of calcite are surrounded by softer areas of a material called calcium carbonate. This means that when the calcite cracks, the energy moves to the softer layer preventing any further cracking.
The challenge when translating this principle to cement was that cement is a much more disordered structure. Helmut Cölfen, head of the research team, says the team had to find a way to generate "fracture-resistance at the nano-level."
The key was discovering a material that only adhered to the cement particles allowing for this brick-and-mortar effect to be replicated within the cement on a nano-scale. Ten negatively charged peptide combinations were identified as perfect molecules to create the nanostructured cement.
Using an electron microscope to analyze and test the resulting optimized cement the team calculated it to have a fracture resistance value of 200 megapascals, which is approaching the value of steel.
The study concludes that this new cement could create concrete that is between 40 and 100 times stronger than current mixes.
"Our cement, which is significantly more fracture-resistant than anything that has been developed thus far, provides us with completely new construction possibilities", says Cölfen.
The results were published in the journal Materials Science.
Source: University of Konstanz via Eurekalert
Environmentalists can cheer that the idea is to not need steel in the concrete, as it bends as much as 'nacre' which is to say a 'fingernail grown rather thick.'
How can they not have included tube feet though? https://askabiologist.asu.edu/tube-feet Ask for them in your as-built!
As to your concern about cement, am I to assume you would like us to start investigating mud housing instead?
On a more serious note, massively stronger concrete would enable a reduction (or elimination) of rebar, and significantly thinner structural elements. In the former case valuable steel would be saved, and in the latter less concrete would be used. Both of these would be net positive no matter how you like to peel your onion.