Space

Rolls-Royce gets $6M to develop its ambitious nuclear space reactor

Rolls-Royce gets $6M to develop its ambitious nuclear space reactor
The Micro-Reactor can be used for nuclear space propulsion
The Micro-Reactor can be used for nuclear space propulsion
View 5 Images
The fuel for the Micro-Reactor is in the form of radioactive pellets
1/5
The fuel for the Micro-Reactor is in the form of radioactive pellets
Cutaway view of the reactor core
2/5
Cutaway view of the reactor core
The Micro-Reactor heat exchangers
3/5
The Micro-Reactor heat exchangers
The Micro-Reactor can be used for nuclear space propulsion
4/5
The Micro-Reactor can be used for nuclear space propulsion
Mock-up of the Micro-Reactor
5/5
Mock-up of the Micro-Reactor
View gallery - 5 images

Rolls-Royce has received an additional £4.8 million (US$6.2 million) in funding from the UK Space Agency (UKSA) to develop key technology for a nuclear micro-reactor that could one day power lunar bases and spacecraft propulsion.

In the 1969 science fiction film Doppelganger (AKA Journey to the Far Side of the Sun), when the hero docks with his orbiting interplanetary spaceship in the last act, he's greeted by the Rolls-Royce logo on the ship's nuclear rocket engines. Over five decades later, that bit of cinematic prognostication is pushing toward reality as Rolls-Royce moves forward with plans for its space nuclear Micro-Reactor that could, among other things, power spacecraft propulsion systems.

The latest award from the UKSA through its National Space Innovation Programme (NSIP) brings the total funding well towards meeting the £9.1million (US$11.7 million) projected total cost of the project. According to Rolls-Royce, the whole system design will be completed in 18 months with the help of academic collaborators at the University of Oxford and Bangor University, with the first orbital test of the reactor slated for before the end of the decade and testing of a Moon version a few years later.

Rolls-Royce Micro Reactor

The purpose of the Micro Reactor is to create an energy dense, reliable, and extremely portable power source for not only long-term exploration and scientific missions on the Moon and in deep space, but as a marketable British system for commercial customers for both space and terrestrial applications.

The reason a nuclear reactor is needed is that conventional solar power, fuel cells, batteries, and the like are either only suitable for short terms or are intermittent in their power generation. Worse, they don't produce that much energy – and energy is going to be needed in increasingly greater quantities over the next century.

The Micro-Reactor differs from a Small Modular Reactor (SMR) in that the former is much smaller, more streamlined and portable. Where the SMR generates 0.5 GW of power and needs an area covering two football pitches for all its gear, the Micro-Reactor produces one to 10 MW and is small enough to be stuck on the back of a truck. This means it can not only be used at a planetary base, but moved from place to place or even power a rover indefinitely.

Cutaway view of the reactor core
Cutaway view of the reactor core

Completely independent of its environment, the Micro-Reactor is fueled by pellets made of layers of enriched uranium or plutonium, carbon, and ceramic. These are set in tubes in a geometrical graphite core that helps regulate the nuclear reaction, conduct heat from the fuel, and act as a passive safety control. Bespoke heat exchangers make the reactor lightweight and move the heat to where it can be turned into useful power.

This power has a large number of applications, including bases on the Moon or Mars, powering space stations and deep-space vehicles, and for nuclear propulsion systems. These can be electric propulsion, like ion drives, or direct thermal nuclear rockets where a reaction mass, most likely methane, is heated to generate thrust.

This will not only allow for sending missions deep into space with larger payloads or higher velocities, it will also allow orbital satellites to shift orbits quickly for satellite maintenance or defense against hostile actions. Heavy shielding isn't needed for such spacecraft because the reactor/engine can be kept at a distance from the payload or habitat modules by a long boom, giving the vehicle a dumbbell shape.

Mock-up of the Micro-Reactor
Mock-up of the Micro-Reactor

"We are delighted to win this award from the National Space Innovation Programme and to be continuing our collaboration with the UK Space Agency," said Jake Thompson, Director of Novel Nuclear & Special Projects, Rolls-Royce. "This funding is a pivotal point in our Micro-Reactor program and will accelerate our technology progression, bringing us a step closer to powering inspiring human endeavors in space.

"The future of space exploration is greatly dependent on the ability to generate high levels of consistent power and our nuclear Micro-Reactor is the solution that will offer safe, reliable and flexible power to a broad range of space missions."

Source: Rolls-Royce

View gallery - 5 images
7 comments
7 comments
MarylandUSA
Ah, the Queller Drive. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyager%27s_Return
vince
Russia and China will object on the grounds that it could be quickly turned into a dirty bomb or explosive device. Current space laws do not permit nuclear weapons in space.
Karmudjun
Awesome article David. While I am more interested in advances in fusion technology and small sized reactors (so far fission fits that bill) for localized energy augmentation, you hit all the key points. While solar and wind are intermittent, and geothermal is feasible in large installations requiring existing infrastructure for the best LCoE, our energy requirements may be best served by small, local energy production. Oh, and yeah, it can be used as a nuclear rocket engine as even NASA has explored.
SussexWolf
Vince - the Soviet Union already flew a nuclear reactor in space, and Russia and China are collaborating on their own new space reactor, as is the US.
Username
1. I'll take one for the cottage!
2. That video is absolutely useless.
anthony88
Google tells me that's enough power for 3,000 homes. This opens up municipality-level ownership of power supply, as long as the implementation and running costs are not too high and safety isn't an issue.
Dirk Scott
So, outside the earth’s atmosphere is the best place to do solar power, so who needs a nuclear reactor in space? Come on, admit it guys, like most nuclear power this is a military project dressed up as something positive.