Space

US Space Force's "secret" spaceplane lands after record 908 days in orbit

US Space Force's "secret" spaceplane lands after record 908 days in orbit
OTV-6 spent 908 days in orbit
OTV-6 spent 908 days in orbit
View 4 Images
Technicians in protective suits against toxic fuel examine OTV-6
1/4
Technicians in protective suits against toxic fuel examine OTV-6
OTV-6 on the ground at the Kennedy Space Center
2/4
OTV-6 on the ground at the Kennedy Space Center
OTV-6 spent 908 days in orbit
3/4
OTV-6 spent 908 days in orbit
OTV-6 beofre launch showing the new service module
4/4
OTV-6 beofre launch showing the new service module
View gallery - 4 images

With a reported sonic boom, the US Space Force's open-secret X-37B spaceplane returned to terra firma on Saturday, November 12. The robotic craft touched down at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center Shuttle Landing Facility in Florida at 5:22 am EST after a record-breaking 908 days in orbit.

The Orbital Test Vehicle-6 (OTV-6) mission launched on May 17, 2020 from Space Launch Complex 41 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida atop a specially modified Atlas V 501 rocket. As with the previous five OTV missions, the exact objectives of the Boeing-built, unmanned, reusable, autonomous spacecraft and the length of the mission were classified, though it also carried a number of open experiments for customers like NASA and the Naval Research Laboratory.

Surpassing the previous record of 780 days in orbit held by OTV-5, OTV-6 introduced a new service module. This ring-shaped module, which was attached to the stern of the spacecraft, provided more payload space for more experiments. Before OTV-6 reentered the atmosphere, the service module was jettisoned and will continue to orbit the Earth before making a controlled reentry to burn up somewhere over the South Pacific.

OTV-6 beofre launch showing the new service module
OTV-6 beofre launch showing the new service module

Among the experiments the spacecraft carried were the Naval Research Laboratory's Photovoltaic Radiofrequency Antenna Module to test the concept of harnessing solar rays and then transmitting power to the Earth using microwaves, and the US Air Force Academy's FalconSat-8 that was released and remains in orbit as a "hands-on" laboratory for Academy cadets.

In addition, NASA's Materials Exposure and Technology Innovation in Space (METIS-2) experiment exposed thermal control coatings, printed electronic materials, and candidate radiation shielding materials to the harsh conditions of space before returning them to Earth for analysis and comparison with computer models. On the biological side, another NASA payload exposed seeds to space to study the effects of cosmic radiation and other factors on potential crops grown on future space bases.

"The X-37B continues to push the boundaries of experimentation, enabled by an elite government and industry team behind the scenes," said Lieutenant Colonel Joseph Fritschen, Department of the Air Force Rapid Capabilities Office’s X-37B Program Director. "The ability to conduct on-orbit experiments and bring them home safely for in-depth analysis on the ground has proven valuable for the Department of the Air Force and scientific community. The addition of the service module on OTV-6 allowed us to host more experiments than ever before."

Source: US Space Force

View gallery - 4 images
9 comments
9 comments
john kennedy
There is significant difference in scale of the ship (when viewed next to people) in photo 1 versus photo 3. Why is this?
Bob809
I think the difference in size of the people against the size of the X-37B is down to perspective. The Guy at the 'truck' behind the X-37B is a distance away on the other side of it, so he looks smaller or the craft looks larger. The guy in the foreground of that picture is still not right up close to the X-37B and so it looks much larger. Just my observation.
I wonder how much those snazzy green boots cost?
Daishi
@John The scale of photo 3 is confusing but the legs of the small person in the photo belong to someone standing next to a bus on the other side of the craft. It's much closer to the large person in foreground than it seems from the photo.
Troublesh00ter
@Bob809 If you have to ask, you can't afford them! [grin!]
JR
Telephoto lens compression is more pronounced when the person and the plane are further apart.
Kpar
Bob809, you are exactly correct.
TimNZ
Why is there 4 people in hazmat suits and there is 1 person in just high vis top with mask? Did the bloke in the high vis not get the same briefing? If it was for toxic fuel risk, I would have thought that bloke would be in the hazmat as well.
GaryM
The space shuttle could have been landed without a pilot, but I read the astronaut corps made sure this feature was "disconnected." This seems correct as the Russian shuttle did land with no crew. I think the shuttle could have been built with a capsule semi-enclosed in the nose with an abort system. This pod-like section could have been removed and the cargo bay lengthened for unmanned missions. But it would have cost more, and they wanted it cheap. The SRB's never broke even when more expensive and more powerful liquid fuel boosters would have and also allowed for such an abort-pod design. An engine module mounted on the bottom of the external tank and recovered separately, which was studied for a cargo version, would have allowed the shuttle to be mounted on top of the stack and to carry a larger payload, but, again, more money. It would have looked something like the SLS which ironically expends boosters and engines designed to be reusable.
GaryM
I am really excited about and anticipating the results of the Space Solar Power experiment. Can't wait to find out how well it worked.