US Army tests drone-killing 50 mm cannon
While civilian countermeasures to combat malicious drones is moving toward UAV-freezing radio beams, the US Army is taking a more permanent approach. Under development by the U.S. Army Research, Development, and Engineering Center (ARDEC) at Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey, the Enhanced Area Protection and Survivability (EAPS) system used steerable 50 mm smart rounds to shoot down two drones in recent tests.
The Army says that EAPS is a gun-based alternative to the missile-based Counter Rocket, Artillery, and Mortar (C-RAM) system currently favored by the US military. It was originally designed to counter rockets, artillery, and mortars (RAM), but due to the increasing threat from UAVs the system’s mission was expanded to include drones.
Using a 50 mm cannon, EAPS fires guided interceptor projectiles guided by a precision tracking radar interferometer and a fire control computer. The system tracks the projectile and the target and computes an ideal trajectory correction. A radio transceiver then beams an engagement "basket" at the target for the projectile to home in on. Thrusters on the projectile are used for course correction and as it nears the target a forward-fragmenting warhead with a tantalum-tungsten alloy liner detonates to deal with C-RAM targets, while steel body fragments take out unmanned drones.
"In order to minimize the electronics on board the interceptor and to make it cheaper, all the 'smarts' are basically done on the ground station," says Manfredi Luciano, project officer for the EAPS Army Technology Objective. "The computations are done on the ground, and the radio frequency sends the information up to the round."
On August 19, EAPS underwent final proof-of-principle demonstration tests at the Yuma Proving Ground in Arizona. During the test, it shot down two remotely piloted Outlaw class aircraft built by Griffon Aerospace at a range of 1 km (0.62 mi) and an altitude of 1,500 m (4,900 ft). This replicated the first EAPS shoot down of a loitering aircraft on April 22, but at 50 percent greater range.
According to Luciano, the technology developed for EAPS could one day be used in a newly configured Army or Navy tactical air defense system.
Source: US Army
Please keep comments to less than 150 words. No abusive material or spam will be published.
Unless it's blowing Predator drones out of the sky, pass on that.
But they're at least aware of that problem. That's why they're trying to cut costs by using artillery rather than antimissiles, and ground-based computing.
Unfortunately, this means that the projectile itself has effectively become a drone. It has actuator surfaces and is ground-controlled. The only thing missing is a drive---the gun is supplying that. But is the cost of that vehicle, amortized on a per-shot basis, less than the cost of a drone engine and controller?
Now what if the drone has ECCM, jamming the projectile's control channel? The drone's transmitter is closer to the projectile, but has limited power. . . Is the cost of that ECCM worth putting it in?
This is an exercise in economics, more than in engineering and tactics.
There's no way that a steerable projectile costs anything less than about $5-10k each from a scamming defense contractor. Cheaper than a missile maybe, but not cheaper than dozens of consumer grade UAVs.
Perhaps a bigger question - Are we trying to get rid of surveillance UAVs or enemy weaponized drones? If the latter, then I guess my write-up is moot.
Maybe a wide spreading concussion device to take out hundreds at a time...