Volvo confirms fuel savings of 25 percent with flywheel KERS

Volvo confirms fuel savings of...
Volvo's Flywheel KERS
Volvo's Flywheel KERS
View 17 Images
Volvo's Flywheel KERS
Volvo's Flywheel KERS
Volvo's Flywheel KERS
Volvo's Flywheel KERS
Volvo's Flywheel KERS
Volvo's Flywheel KERS
Volvo's Flywheel KERS
Volvo's Flywheel KERS
Volvo's Flywheel KERS
Volvo's Flywheel KERS
Volvo's Flywheel KERS
Volvo's Flywheel KERS
Volvo's Flywheel KERS
Volvo's Flywheel KERS
View gallery - 17 images

After extensive testing of its kinetic flywheel technology, Volvo has announced that the system can boost fuel economy by 25 percent. The company is now looking at integrating the Flywheel KERS system into its production line.

Volvo's Flywheel KERS is fitted to the rear axle. During deceleration, the braking action causes the flywheel to spin at up to 60,000 rpm. Meanwhile, the front-mounted engine shuts off. The energy stored in the spinning flywheel can then be applied via a special transmission toward acceleration or used to power the car once it reaches cruising speed.

Volvo's experimental flywheel is a carbon fiber model that spins in a vacuum to minimize frictional losses. It weighs 13.2 pounds (6 kg) and measures about 8 inches (20 cm) in diameter.

During road testing with a Volvo S60 flywheel test car, Volvo found that when partnered with a four-cylinder engine, the flywheel technology offers up to a 25 percent reduction in fuel consumption versus a comparably performing turbo six-cylinder. It says that the system can also augment the engine with an 80 hp boost, giving it acceleration comparable to a six-cylinder – 0-62 mph (100 km/h) in as quick as 5.5 seconds.

Volvo's Flywheel KERS
Volvo's Flywheel KERS

"The flywheel's stored energy is sufficient to power the car for short periods. This has a major impact on fuel consumption," explained Derek Crabb, Vice President Powertrain Engineering at Volvo Car Group. "Our calculations indicate that it will be possible to turn off the combustion engine about half the time when driving according to the official New European Driving Cycle."

While the Flywheel KERS system has some clear potential, it's able to store energy only for a finite amount of time while it continues spinning. As such, it's best for driving conditions where there are frequent starts and stops. Like some hybrids and electric vehicles, Volvo's Flywheel-equipped vehicles will get the better fuel economy in the city.

"We are the first manufacturer that has applied flywheel technology to the rear axle of a car fitted with a combustion engine driving the front wheels. The next step after completing these successful tests is to evaluate how the technology can be implemented in our upcoming car models," said Crabb.

Source: Volvo

View gallery - 17 images
Kris Lee
Volvo is becoming interesting again. 4 cylinder from 0 to 100 km/h in 5.5 seconds and at the same time saving fuel? This is nothing but amazing.
I'm also wondering if this would be more logical inside rear drive car? Or this is what they are doing here? In general Volvo produces front drive cars.
The idea of a flywheel for storing kinetic energy on the rear axel is an interesting new departure from Volvo which they reckon reduces fuel consumption by 25%. Great for urban driving where there's lots of stopping and starting or for undulating terrain making this the ideal car for San Francisco and Monaghan
Gerard Meehan
Congratulations Volvo - re using energy has got to be good'
Mel Tisdale
I suppose that this concept is another function that GPS can be adapted to. Knowing when the vehicle is going to reach its destination, the GPS could ensure that all the stored energy is used up beforehand so that it does not go to waste while the car is parked.
I think it could be used in addition to the regenerative breaks on hybrids and electric cars. The flywheel could be attached to a generator and produce electricity when needed and/or charge the batteries?
No magic here but nice implementation. Since it was tested in a 4-cylinder car how about comparing it to a 4 cylinder car rather than a six i.e., what are the fuel savings then? Is it approximately equivalent to a turbo without the fuel losses associated with higher RPM and fully depressed accelerator? What about the possibility of pairing it with a diesel where RPM are lower by design? Since it is reliant on recovered stopping forces what is the ratio of benefit to weight of vehicle in a standard driving cycle? Is there an optimal braking pressure, such as mashing the brakes and letting the ABS take over, or will feathering the brakes spin the KERS up to full speed? If the vehicle is equipped with handling assistance, will single wheel braking also activate the flywheel?
Dan Lewis
I agree with BigWarpGuy, that research and development of an all electric car using this flywheel system should be fast tracked. An all electric version might pose quite a challenge to Volvo, the company being accustomed to producing relatively heavy cars these days. Now it will have to get both light and super safe.
Get an electric version out on the street immediately, refine it and offer generation 2.
Seems like a metal flywheel would be less expensive as it is the mass that creates the flywheels stored energy. Must be a good reason for CF. I felt the flywheel would also be a good application for the stop start systems in use today as it could be energized in a similar way and then coupled to restart and aid in initial acceleration.
An energy recovery system that can actually pay for itself and wont loose capacity as it ages. Very Good!
Why would anyone think that putting a flywheel energy recovery system on a car that already has an energy recovery system is a good idea? Especially when the the electric car is already too expensive.
David Khoo
Slowburn, I think the issue is more complexity, than cost, as KERS is able to recover a greater percent of braking losses (because of the ability to store more energy in a smaller time frame than chemical battery storage)
The carry on from this is that the range is increased by one of these units, you no longer need some of the chemical batteries capacity, therefore you are able to reduce the cost and weight of the batteries.
Part of the problem with the capital cost of electric cars is the batteries are often an upfront cost, when they probably should be an ongoing cost, like fuel and engine servicing in a conventional car.
The Renault Zoe in the UK is using the strategy of selling you the car, but leasing you the batteries, creating a cost structure that makes much more sense when you try to compare equivalent conventional car costs.
Load More