Aircraft

Airbus and Toshiba team up to create superconducting aircraft motor

Airbus and Toshiba team up to create superconducting aircraft motor
View 1 Image
1/1

Making a virtue out of necessity, Airbus is joining forces with Toshiba to develop a super-efficient superconducting motor for aircraft that uses the liquid hydrogen that supplies the electricity to cool the propulsion and adjacent systems.

Of all the options for making aircraft emissions-free that doesn't include just turning them all into gliders, hydrogen is the most promising because it combines a relatively high energy density with the ability to reduce emissions to little more than water. However, hydrogen takes up a lot of room for the available energy compared to aviation fuel, and the only practical way to handle it is as a cryogenic liquid cooled to below -253 °C (-423 °F).

In hydrogen-powered aircraft, The idea is that the hydrogen is fed into a fuel cell that generates electricity that either charges battery banks or drives an electric motor directly. However, there's still a weight problem because electric motors powerful enough to be practical for conventional-sized aircraft are very heavy, with a poor power-to-weight ratio.

Airbus/Toshiba

To overcome this, both Airbus, through its Airbus UpNext subsidiary, and Toshiba, through its Toshiba Energy Systems & Solutions Corporation energy arm, have been looking at how to use the liquid hydrogen for the fuel cells to cool a cryogenic superconducting electric motor before going to the fuel cell.

When certain materials are cooled below a certain temperature, like that of liquid hydrogen, they become superconducting. In other words, the material's electrical resistance drops almost to zero and can hold an electrical current indefinitely. This allows for much more powerful and efficient magnets at the heart of CAT scanners, particle accelerators, some power transmission networks, and, wait for it, electric motors.

In fact, Airbus claims that a superconducting motor is over three times lighter than a conventional system and has a 97% powertrain efficiency rating. This makes for a lot more power coming out of a much smaller, lighter package – something obviously attractive for use on an aircraft.

Signed at Japan Aerospace 2024, the agreement between the two companies will combine the technology from Airbus's Cryoprop demonstrator project and Toshiba's half-century development of its 2-megawatt-class superconductivity motor prototype.

"Partnering with Toshiba presents a unique opportunity to push beyond the limitations of today’s partial superconducting and conventional electrical motors," said Grzegorz Ombach, Airbus Senior Vice President and Head of Disruptive R&T. "Through this collaboration, we aim to deliver a breakthrough technology that could unlock new design possibilities, in particular for Airbus' future hydrogen-powered aircraft. This partnership represents a natural and essential step in advancing superconducting motor technology to meet the needs of the aerospace industry."

Source: Airbus

4 comments
4 comments
Karmudjun
I can see this being applied to large transport vehicles such as trains, trucks, and buses. I'm not sure it would replace the current Tesla and other EV propulsion systems as the complexity and storage requirements may exceed the benefits gained by using hydrogen for electricity production after supercooling the motor. There is always that cost of activation - I can see large, constant use vehicles dealing with these issues by optimizing engagement, and by having support facilities that could take over cooling the fuel and bringing the motor temperature to an effective superconducting range before the vehicle takes to the streets (or air as Airbus intends)
notarichman
how big, heavy is the fuel cell and hydrogen tank? please compare total ICE drive train to total hydrogen, fuel cell, batteries, motor system, inverter?.
batteries are heavy. I imagine a hydrogen tank that is loaded is heavy.
pete-y
Clearly a technology well worth investigating though weight trade offs may work out better with 'old tech' we must be able to understand the trade-offs.
Good to see Airbus leading to keep Europe in the game.
Rustgecko
So we will use perfectly good electricity (which may or may not come from renewable sources) and lose a lot of it in the process of creating the hydrogen, which then has to be cooled to -253C and kept at that temperature, losing yet more electricity. Are we sure this isn't a virtue signalling exercise rather than doing any actual good?