Automotive

INNengine “one-stroke” waves away conventional engine design

INNengine “one-stroke” waves away conventional engine design
The INNengine e-Rex is technically a two-stroke engine, but without all of the downsides of a conventional two-stroke
The INNengine e-Rex is technically a two-stroke engine, but without all of the downsides of a conventional two-stroke
View 5 Images
The INNengine e-Rex is technically a two-stroke engine, but without all of the downsides of a conventional two-stroke
1/5
The INNengine e-Rex is technically a two-stroke engine, but without all of the downsides of a conventional two-stroke
Although showcasing the e-Rex engine in a conventional car was the start, INNengine is showing it now as a hybridization option
2/5
Although showcasing the e-Rex engine in a conventional car was the start, INNengine is showing it now as a hybridization option
The e-Rex in its ready-to-install form is very compact
3/5
The e-Rex in its ready-to-install form is very compact
The cam-track, shown bottom-left here, can be have its coordination with its opposite mate in order to change compression ratios within the chambers
4/5
The cam-track, shown bottom-left here, can be have its coordination with its opposite mate in order to change compression ratios within the chambers
This simple GIF animation shows the INNengine e-Rex in operation
5/5
This simple GIF animation shows the INNengine e-Rex in operation
View gallery - 5 images

With a slogan like “The Future is Ecclectic,” we’d expect some interesting things from INNengine, a startup based in Spain. The company is showcasing a “one-stroke” engine that works as an opposed piston with a wavy twist.

The “one-stroke” is in quotes as the engine is actually a two stroke (by definition), in that it has two movements (strokes) in its combustion process. Unlike most conventional two-stroke engines, however, the INNengine e-Rex doesn’t burn oil or even use one of those strokes to lubricate or cool itself. Those happen separately as they would with a conventional four-stroke automotive engine.

In those conventional engines, intake, compression, combustion, and exhaust strokes all take place separately. In a two-stroke engine, there is only compression and combustion, with intake/exhaust happening simultaneously with those. Two-stroke engines are generally more powerful for their package size and more thermodynamically efficient than four-stroke engines. But conventional designs are also dirty and (more often than not) noisy.

With the INNengine e-Rex, all of the advantages of a two-stroke engine are there, but the disadvantages are not. Making it a compelling option. It also outputs at one or both sides without much modification, which means it can be used to propel more than one axle easily.

The INNengine design is an opposed piston setup in which there are four pistons on each side to make eight in all. The opposing pistons share a combustion chamber and have fixed rods behind them. These rods press on plates with an oscillating wave-like design so that the rods press and release the pistons in a smooth, coordinated movement. Intake and exhaust happens as it would with a two-stroke engine, with the exhaust port being just ahead of the intake port so that it leaves and begins creating a vacuum just as the piston moves past the intake port, to allow fresh air in for the next cycle. Fuel and spark are fed as they would be with any other piston-based engine.

This simple GIF animation shows the INNengine e-Rex in operation
This simple GIF animation shows the INNengine e-Rex in operation

This opposed piston setup makes for smooth operation with very low noise and vibration, while the packaging keeps the whole engine small. What’s more, controlling the gap between the pistons during compression by shifting one or the other end plate slightly allows for variable compression as well. Improving efficiency even more.

INNengine is showcasing its e-Rex design as a working prototype in a Mazda MX-5 Miata. The engine allows the car to become all-wheel drive and looks to take up about half the space (our assumption from visuals) that the conventional 1.8L engine occupied. It’s also far lighter in weight. Yet the 500cc e-Rex is said to be producing 126 horsepower, which is comparable to the 1.8L’s output. INNengine did not specify torque output and did not respond to answer that question before publication. It’s noted that their test engine did have a forced air setup on it. That is likely to boost the torque output, which we suspect is relatively low in a design like this given the lack of leverage from the pistons.

For this reason, we aren’t too sure about the INNengine e-Rex being capable enough to be a direct drive for most automotive applications. Despite this being what the company is trying to showcase. The engine might, however, be a very useful option as an efficient generator in a hybrid or range-extension option. Used in an electric vehicle, the INNengine could reduce the battery size requirement and offer lower weight and a better long distance driving option – especially if it can run as a multi-fuel option, which INNengine says it is capable of doing. Given that batteries are (and will likely long be) the heaviest and costliest part of an EV, that could be a boon.

Considering that the battery electric model of a vehicle is typically 30% heavier (or more) versus its standard gasoline combustion counterpart, this engine option could present a way to mitigate the safety and road wear risk associated by downsizing batteries in favor of an efficient combustion generator. Given that most people drive 30-40 miles (48-64 km) a day on average, this reduction in weight would not only give longer range to the batteries left on board, but it would allow the combustion to only be used when the vehicle is going further than normal. And it would make the car safer, as crash testing is showing that heavier vehicles mean more injuries for people in other vehicles in a wreck – and that’s an issue that’s very unlikely to go away anytime soon.

The e-Rex in its ready-to-install form is very compact
The e-Rex in its ready-to-install form is very compact

The INNengine e-Rex is an interesting innovation that could find a home in automotive. It’s also ripe for use in other sectors such as marine and off-grid power generation. A few questions about its capabilities still remain unanswered, but it’s one of the most interesting designs we’ve seen in some time.

Source: INNengine

View gallery - 5 images
29 comments
29 comments
mark34
the engine needed the forced air induction (via turbocharging and/or supercharging) in order to effectively scavenge the exhaust gasses over a wide range of rpm. To depend on a precisely tuned exhaust system in this 2 stroke cycle would result in a narrow power band (once you managed to get it started). Research Jumo 223 aircraft engines, Napier-Deltic locomotive engines, and Achates Power automotive engines for more examples. Also investigate Detroit 71 series engines for information about the operation of open- crankcase 2 stroke engines.
riczero-b
Swash plate axial engines seem to resurface every 5 years or so, with little or no real-world uptake. Maybe advances in machine tooling have made this feasible, but you still have the problem of 2 stroke dirty emissions.
Buk
You said: "et the 500cc e-Rex is said to be producing 126 horsepower, which is comparable to the 1.8L’s output. INNengine did not specify torque output and did not respond to answer that question before publication. "

I found a reference to this on their innengine.com website: "A 700cc 120HP/244Nm engine weighs just 38kg"
Buk
riczero-b: " but you still have the problem of 2 stroke dirty emissions."

It's not a 2-stroke; and doesn't use oil in fuel lubrication.
Peter Forte
This would seem to offer the ideal compromise between battery and low carbon IC; especially if we could just use battery power for high torque situations like starting off. We might even be able to get by with ultra or supercapacitors in combination with a clean enough version of this engine.
Expanded Viewpoint
Torque is not horsepower, Buk. The torque curve of an engine, (not a motor) is dependent upon several factors, such as volumetric efficiency, compression ratio, ignition timing, cubic inches of displacement. There is very little mechanical advantage (leverage) in a swash plate design as compared to a crankshaft throw, and that is why the torque is going to be low. Low end RPM torque is what you need to get a car or truck or train moving quickly. This is a great engine design for stationary use or for an adjunct for range extending. I would love to see a dyno pull being done on this to see what its real performance values are. And I'd like to see the HC levels in the exhaust stream, because it looks to me that there might be a lot of unburned fuel coming out of it. Only a sniff test will say for sure.
riczero-b
BUK " the engine is actually a 2 stroke " as the article states. It is in the nature of two strokes to pollute more irrespective of lubrication mode because of the combined intake / exhaust cycle stage.
darkcook
Looks a lot like the old Dynacam engine from 20-years ago, that was also revolutionary at the time, but never seemed to go anywhere. Although, I did see that they have an FAA certified version (?). But still, I don't see them anywhere.
Catweazle
Yet another swashplate motor, all the same problems with surface-to-volume ratio and scavenge, to name but two.
Looks like another subsidy harvesting scheme to me.
P51d007
Sigh....how many times, since I got my license in the mid 70's, have I seen "a new engine" that would blow everything away...
This is just the latest.
Load More