Space

New electronics open up Venus for exploration

New electronics open up Venus for exploration
Global view of Venus
Global view of Venus
View 2 Images
Integrated circuit before (above) and after (below) testing in Venus atmospheric conditions
1/2
Integrated circuit before (above) and after (below) testing in Venus atmospheric conditions
Global view of Venus
2/2
Global view of Venus

One reason NASA's Mars lander missions have been so successful is the development of silicon-based integrated circuits capable of surviving the Martian environment for years. Now NASA is hoping for similar results for Venus by developing silicon carbide circuits that can withstand the incredibly hostile Venusian conditions for over 520 hours without special shielding or cooling systems.

Venus was once thought one of the two most likely places in the Solar System where life might exist, but the Mariner and Venera space probes of the 1960s and '70s told another story. Instead of the swampy world inhabited by dinosaurs as imagined by sci-fi writers, the unmanned explorers found a planet with a surface temperature of 460° C (860° F), a carbon dioxide atmosphere 94 times has heavy as Earth's, and weather marked by deadly sulfuric acid rains.

Despite these hellish conditions, a series of Soviet Venera missions attempted to land on Venus – many of them successfully. However, "successful" is a relative word. In order to survive the landing and send back data, the Venera landers used massive, specially armored pressure vessels with special cooling systems. None lasted more than 127 minutes on the surface before succumbing to the hostile environment.

According to NASA, even a lander built today wouldn't last more than a few hours. There are many reasons for this, but a key factor is the electronics used by the lander. Just as a Mars lander couldn't survive using the old radio valves or primitive printed circuits of the 1950s, the silicon-based integrated circuits used today can only operate on Venus for a brief time under heavy protection.

NASA's answer is to develop a new electronics technology using much tougher silicon carbide as a base. A team at the space agency's Glenn Research Center in Cleveland, Ohio produced silicon carbide semiconductor integrated circuits, two of which were subjected to a simulated Venusian environment in the Glenn Extreme Environments Rig (GEER).

Integrated circuit before (above) and after (below) testing in Venus atmospheric conditions
Integrated circuit before (above) and after (below) testing in Venus atmospheric conditions

What the team found was that, without any special protection, the silicon carbide circuits survived for 521 hours, which is a fair advance on 127 minutes. According to NASA, the circuits were still functional after the test. Similar circuits were originally developed to operate inside aircraft engines and had already survived 1,000 hours at a temperature of 482°C (900° F) in the Earth's atmosphere.

"This work not only enables the potential for new science in extended Venus surface and other planetary exploration," says Gary Hunter, principal investigator for the Venus surface electronics development. "But it also has potentially significant impact for a range of Earth relevant applications, such as in aircraft engines to enable new capabilities, improve operations, and reduce emissions,"

The research was published in AIP Advances.

Source: NASA

5 comments
5 comments
ChrisWalker
and yet quantum entanglement meshed with hologram technology could theoretically place a human being on the surface as a projected pattern of information that can observe and report what they see.
but lets not develop energy projection technologies, might get in the way of this steel and missile war business profits
Ralf Biernacki
Just think of the possibilities this offers for processor overclocking. With circuits that won't be fried at 500°C. . .
S Michael
Why... What is on Venus that we have to spend millions if not billions to learn. Go to the moon, go to mars... Not Venus, we are not going to build anything there that will last for any length of time. Now, if I am wrong, and Russia, and NASA have some good reasons to spend money, please tell us the taxpayer what it is... We deserve to know, more than "It will lead us to understand our planet." Hogwash.
JackOLeary
Carl Sagan discovered Venus' high surface temperature before the Mariner probe:
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1960AJ.....65..352S
Ralf Biernacki
@SMichael: Venus is more challenging to terraform than Mars, but if it can be done, we will have Earth v2.0. No other place in our solar system offers that. It may be a long shot, but its worth every penny put in research. Another Earth, just next door; priceless.