Computers

Social media surveillance drives 2019 drop in global internet freedom

Social media surveillance driv...
The United States saw a decline in its internet freedom score for the third consecutive year in the Freedom on the Net report
The United States saw a decline in its internet freedom score for the third consecutive year in the Freedom on the Net report
View 3 Images
The United States saw a decline in its internet freedom score for the third consecutive year in the Freedom on the Net report
1/3
The United States saw a decline in its internet freedom score for the third consecutive year in the Freedom on the Net report
The 65 countries surveyed in this year's internet freedom report
2/3
The 65 countries surveyed in this year's internet freedom report
The vast majority of countries undergoing elections over the past 12 months saw some form of digital election interference
3/3
The vast majority of countries undergoing elections over the past 12 months saw some form of digital election interference

An annual report tracking internet freedom across the world has found global declines for the ninth consecutive year. Underpinned by domestic election interference and social media surveillance, the report identified internet freedom deterioration in more than half of the 65 countries assessed.

Titled Freedom on the Net, this annual report is published by Freedom House, a non-governmental organization promoting democracy and civil rights. Freedom House is primarily US Government funded, however, since its founding in 1941, it has attempted to track the ebb and flow of global freedoms from an apolitical standpoint.

This internet freedom report has been published annually since 2009, and this report marks the 10th year of the survey. Initially only chronicling 15 countries, the report gradually increased its scope and since 2014 has analyzed internet freedom in 65 countries.

The report surveys internet freedom in countries from three perspectives: Obstacles to access – evaluating social and economic factors limiting internet access, as well as governmental efforts to block access; Limits on content – evaluating governmental control of content, from diversity of news media to specific content censorship; and Violations of user rights – measuring how many protections citizens have against surveillance, and what kinds of legal repercussions users can suffer from online activity.

Each country surveyed receives a score out of 100 based on evaluations of those three categories. For the ninth consecutive year a majority of countries surveyed demonstrated declines in internet freedom scores, with a striking 33 out of 65 countries displaying drops in overall scores.

The 65 countries surveyed in this year's internet freedom report
The 65 countries surveyed in this year's internet freedom report

Unsurprisingly, China recorded the lowest rate of internet freedom with a score of 10. Other low scoring countries rated "Not Free" included Iran (15), Vietnam (24), Egypt (26), Russia (31), and Turkey (37).

Brazil (64), Bangladesh (44), and Zimbabwe (42) all reported some of the biggest declines in internet freedom over the past year. Even the United States (77) saw a decline of one point, based on expanded law enforcement surveillance of social media platforms and electronic devices, and an exacerbation of disinformation spread by government officials. This is the third consecutive year the report calculated a decline in US internet freedom.

The two biggest global factors identified in the report as responsible for driving the majority of internet freedom declines have been an increase in social media surveillance, and election interference through digital media.

“Many governments are finding that on social media, propaganda works better than censorship,” says Mike Abramowitz, president of Freedom House. “Authoritarians and populists around the globe are exploiting both human nature and computer algorithms to conquer the ballot box, running roughshod over rules designed to ensure free and fair elections.”

The report disturbingly identified sophisticated social media surveillance programs in 40 of the 65 countries surveyed, and citizens were arrested for political, social, or religious speech posted online in 47 countries. Total internet shutdowns occurred at some point in 17 different countries over the past year, with the report noting these shut-downs primarily took place either during elections or times of civil protest.

The vast majority of countries undergoing elections over the past 12 months saw some form of digital election interference
The vast majority of countries undergoing elections over the past 12 months saw some form of digital election interference

Social media surveillance is perhaps the biggest focus of the 2019 internet freedom report. From helping disseminate government propaganda and spread misinformation, to offering repressive governments incredibly sophisticated tools to surveil undesirable expression, Freedom House explicitly says, “the future of internet freedom rests on our ability to fix social media.”

“Since these are mainly American platforms, the United States must be a leader in promoting transparency and accountability in the digital age,” suggests Adrian Shahbaz, Freedom House’s research director for technology and democracy. “This is the only way to stop the internet from becoming a Trojan horse for tyranny and oppression.”

Source: Freedom on the Net

4 comments
FB36
IMHO, if governments are doing "social media surveillance" that is because they are they have no other choice left! Just look at endless violent protests in France and Hong Kong, for example! Actually, all over the world "some people" keep using social media to brainwash & manipulate general public and start and drive violent protests against their own governments! And they do not stop even when governments try to accept their demands; they just start asking for new demands! Unless we want to allow all countries in the world, one by one, start experiencing non-stop violent protests (which are massive damage against local economy & disruption against all law enforcement & all government works), then governments have no choice but need to take action using social media!!!
FB36
& not to mention, how any government can be really sure that, if any/all demands of violent protesters are really what majority of general public want??? A tiny percentage of general public, keep doing endless violent protests, to force their governments into accepting their demands is definitely/absolutely NOT how democracy supposed to work!!!
buzzclick
When an org calls itself a sugar-coated "Freedom House", one has to question its POV. We know that cultures around the world need to be kept in check so things don't get out of hand, using whatever medium necessary to control the mindset of the population. Social media has become a tool and a weapon of immense power in the past 20 years and it's here to stay. It's only natural that surveillance and security take precedence, but when its under nefarious control it gets creepy. The balance between freedom of expression and negative energies is a complicated one. The internet was suppose to be a democratizing effect on society, but since 9/11, that's all changed. Eastern and Western cultures may have different approaches but the intent is the same.
yermadaho
FB36 - How exactly did you determine what percentage of people are thinking about the protests in all these countries? Just because a person isn't at the protest doesn't mean they don't agree with it. Perhaps, Chicken Little, you should consider residence in one of the 31 named countries that will protect you from the freedom monsters. Of course, then you might lose the chance to voice your opinion as you've done here. Funny how that works, eh?