US nuclear regulator greenlights its first small modular reactor
The first small modular reactor (SMR) design has been approved for certification by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). NuScale's tidy reactor design promises safe, clean energy at radically reduced cost, land use and installation time.
The NRC released news last week that its staff have been directed to make a final rule certifying the NuScale reactor design for use in the United States. This is just the seventh design approved by the NRC since it was established in 1974, and the first of a coming wave of technologies designed to make nuclear power cheaper, easier and safer to implement than ever before.
The keys to this small modular reactor's advantages lie in its small size and modularity. Rather than having to build each reactor on site, custom designed for the location, NuScale can mass-manufacture its light water reactor modules in a factory and then ship them worldwide for a relatively quick and painless installation.
Each roughly cylindrical module stands around 65 ft (20 m) high, with a 9-foot (2.7-m) diameter, and produces 77 megawatts by pushing steam out through a turbine. A given power plant could run anywhere between four and 12 of these modules, submerged in a water tank, so an overall power station will be good for between 308 and 924 MW. Nuclear will be a key baseline generator for renewables-based power grids in many areas, and NuScale says its mass production capabilities will make it cost-competitive even with some fossil-fueled options.
Like most other generation IV nuclear designs, the NuScale plant is designed to shut itself down safely in an emergency without any operator input or power requirements. The feedwater and steam exit valves will close in the event of an emergency situation, and a secondary set of valves will open to depressurize steam from the reactor core into the containment vessel surrounding the reactor. As this steam condenses, it'll be taken back into the core and circulated through this process again. NuScale says this'll put the plant in a stable, safe shutdown, and that if anything goes catastrophically wrong, the giant water tank housing the reactor modules, with its concrete roof, provides a final line of defense designed to be earthquake-proof and impermeable to aircraft impacts.
The plant's passive safety measures and tiny ground footprint compared with current nuclear plants make it possible – in the company's opinion, anyway – to put these plants much closer to where the energy's used, cutting down on transmission costs and losses.
The first NuScale power plant is set to begin generating power in 2029, with all six of its modules due to come online in 2030. Located at the Idaho National Laboratory, the Carbon Free Power Project will generate some 462 MW, much of which is already contracted to be sold to power distribution companies for a 40-year period.
This final rule on certification will be the final step in a process NuScale initiated in 2016. Check out some information on the Carbon Free Power Project and NuScale SMR in the video below.
Source: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Editor's note: this piece was updated August 3, 2022, in response to requests from NuScale. The company does not view its technology as a "Generation IV" nuclear reactor.
Please keep comments to less than 150 words. No abusive material or spam will be published.
to both your esteamed organ + to pub's various other,
concerning the security of various previously proposed nuclear gen' 'mini-site' schemes:
ie. The Opinion Common:
They cannot be left as stand-alone and unguarded.
Errrrrr - etc.
A proven tech' even with the magic 'RR' label on it does nothing to negate the security risk if the place of use is removed to an unguarded site.
Discounting war damage as would be common to both proposed isolated land sites + the boats:
Submarines tend to have lots of jolly jack-tars happily horn-piping around 24/7, that even when tied-up in what is, as far as known, to be only in a secured dockyard.
Said bods would get
EXTREMELY PEEVED, VERY FAST, SHOULD ANYBODY EVEN TRY TO GET ON THE BOAT &/OR FLIRT A LOCAL NASTY AT IT.
ie. My + others published sentiments ref the transference of mssrs RR/Others reactor tech' to stand alone unguarded shore based sites stands.
(oh, for the fraidy-cats, maybe we can just put these in low income neighborhoods at least 10 miles from your back yard and underground in bunkers similar to the missile silos so you will agree with the stipulations imposed on the manufacture and placement of these devices which will end up coming somewhat from your tax dollars - as well as with mine).