Energy

Abandoned mines could find new use as gravity batteries

Abandoned mines could find new use as gravity batteries
The scientists behind a new study estimate that, worldwide, there are likely millions of disused mines suitable for energy storage
The scientists behind a new study estimate that, worldwide, there are likely millions of disused mines suitable for energy storage
View 2 Images
The scientists behind a new study estimate that, worldwide, there are likely millions of disused mines suitable for energy storage
1/2
The scientists behind a new study estimate that, worldwide, there are likely millions of disused mines suitable for energy storage
A diagram of the proposed Underground Gravity Energy Storage system
2/2
A diagram of the proposed Underground Gravity Energy Storage system

Just because a mine has been exhausted of its ore, that doesn't necessarily mean it has no value. A 2023 study suggests that the shafts of such abandoned mines could serve as energy-storing gravity batteries.

Editor's note: Readers often ask us for follow-ups on memorable stories. What has happened to this story over the years? This article was originally published in 2023 but has been re-edited and updated with new information current as of Mar. 14, 2025. Enjoy!

First of all, just what is a gravity battery?

Well, in a nutshell, it's a system in which electricity is generated by releasing a heavy load, allowing it to drop. That electricity can then be used at times when demands on the municipal grid are high. At other times, when there's excess energy in the grid, the gravity battery system uses some of that energy to pull the load back up, effectively storing the energy for later use.

One of the most common types of the technology is what's known as a pumped-storage hydroelectric system. In this setup, water is released from a high elevation, generating electricity by spinning up turbines as it flows downhill. When excess energy is available, that water is pumped back up to the starting point.

In 2022, scientists from Austria's International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) proposed a different type of gravity battery. The basic idea was that the elevators in high-rise buildings would use regenerative braking systems to generate electricity while lowering weighted payloads from higher to lower floors. Autonomous trailer robots would pull the loads in and out of the elevators, as needed.

That brings us to the mine-based Underground Gravity Energy Storage (UGES) system, proposed by the same researchers. It would likewise utilize elevators, but these ones would be in existing disused mine shafts, and they'd be raising and lowering containers full of sand.

A diagram of the proposed Underground Gravity Energy Storage system
A diagram of the proposed Underground Gravity Energy Storage system

A series of electric motor/generator units on both sides of the shaft would move each elevator up and down, generating electricity via regenerative braking on the way down, then using some of that electricity on the way back up.

For maximum efficiency, the elevators could take on a sand load at the surface, have that load removed at the bottom of the shaft, then return to the surface empty. Needless to say, the storage area at the bottom of the shaft would eventually fill up with sand in this scenario. For this reason, when there was an excess of energy in the grid, the elevators would have to bring some of the sand back topside. A combination of electric conveyor belts and dump trucks would be used for the on- and offloading.

The scientists estimate that UGES could have a global energy storage potential of 7 to 70 TWh (terawatt hours), with most of the plants being located in countries where there are already a lot of abandoned mines, such as China, India, Russia and the US.

"When a mine closes, it lays off thousands of workers […] UGES would create a few vacancies as the mine would provide energy storage services after it stops operations," said IIASA's Julian Hunt, lead author of a paper on the study. "Mines already have the basic infrastructure and are connected to the power grid, which significantly reduces the cost and facilitates the implementation of UGES plants."

Hunt now informs us that in the time since this article was first published, he has been contacted by many parties interested in developing the UGES system. These have included three mine owners, two investors (including a YouTube executive), and three project developers.

Hunt also states that he is developing "other interesting gravity energy storage concepts," which should be published later in 2025.

Source: IIASA

A version of this article was originally published in 2023.

10 comments
10 comments
michael_dowling
This nonsense keeps popping up. You can't store significant power with blocks of concrete. Pumped hydro storage is what you need to store enough power to make gravity storage sensible,but unfortunately,such storage is limited to certain locations. https://ing.dk/artikel/it-makes-no-sense-dtu-professor-questions-gravity-batteries
1stClassOPP
Wouldn’t such a system account a net loss of energy and become extremely difficult to maintain? ,
TechGazer
Some people simply don't have a good grasp of numbers for large projects. They see a little model of something, such as a falling weight powering an LED, and can't scale it properly in their minds, for size and cost. This concept has been possible for well over 100 years, with no profitable projects storing power, so a few percent increase in efficiency from new technologies isn't going to make it feasible.
PB
The concept of reusing a mine shaft is encouraging, but mine shafts are not deep. When doing a feasibility, the capital cost of excavating down to a pay area is uneconomic from the start unless the deposit is shallow, and if it is shallow then it negates the theory of using it as an energy storage facility. Massive ore deposits are economic when pay occurs very close to surface and extraction is open pit, but, open pit is wide and while an open pit might eventually become deep the broad width negates the "shaft" envisaged in the energy storage
Deres
@michael_dowling In fact, excess energy is mainly caused by having too much solar energy in the energy mix. Thus, this excess energy happens mainly in summer and only for the few hours around noon. Thus, equipping all existing dams with a small lower dam just for working in reverse for a few hours daily would be very interesting.
vince
The best gravity sink is the deep ocean trenches up to 7 miles deep. You can make huge floating barges that sink to bottom and then use solar power to bring back up and repeat. You drop a 1 million pounds 35000 feet thats Force x distance of 3.5 x 10 to 10th power of potential energy that can be recovered for each trip. Make tousands of barges, make 3.5 times 10 to 13th energy. You can also use pipes 10 feet in diameter that go down full 35000 feet and blow out water then allow sea water to flood the pipe and extract same energy as a hydro dam. Repeat and use thousands of pipes. Use floating solar to provide energy to setup the potential energy from falling water. There is no place on Earth where you have a 7 mile drop in elevation like the deep ocean trenches.
globaleducator
You should take a look at Graviticity [https://gravitricity.com/] who are already following this concept. It might not be large scale, and there is no need to load and unload sand, but using existing mines the capital cost should not be too great.
vince
Use hydro power in deep ocean trenches by sinking 7 mike long pipes 20 feet in dianeter or more perhaps 50 feet in diameter. Evacuate pipes, allow ocean water to fall to bottom and extract same energy as done at Hoover dam. And you dont even need to pump wster back up as the ocean is limitless. Not sure how the pioes can be evacuated anhow thick theyvwould have to be to resist water oressure 7 miles deeo but probably 6 inches to 1 foot thick walls. Comoressed air migjh be able to force water back out bit insure if they can build compressors that can matchbebormous psi at 7 miles deep
Nobody
Cables and pulleys require a great deal of maintenance and waste a lot of energy through friction. Storage of a fluid makes way more sense.
Lamar Havard
Permanent magnet turbines put out power turning in either direction. Why not two tanks of water with a chain around the turbine pulley, and a pump to exchange a little water between them to make one tank heavier than the other one, and when it gets to the bottom, pump water from it to the one at the top until it goes down, pulling the lighter one up?