Energy

Solar film you can stick anywhere to generate energy is nearly here

View 2 Images
Power Roll's solar film is inching closer to becoming cheap to produce, and more efficient at generating energy as well
Power Roll / The University of Sheffield
Power Roll's solar film is inching closer to becoming cheap to produce, and more efficient at generating energy as well
Power Roll / The University of Sheffield
A 4-square-inch sample of the film showing how energy-absorbing perovskite is coated on the plastic substrate

Since 2012, UK-based Power Roll has been working on a way to print low-cost solar film to generate clean energy from sunlight. It's now one crucial step closer to manufacturing its lightweight, apply-anywhere film, with a new design for its perovskite solar cells that should make make production cheap and scalable.

Power Roll has been focusing on embossing 'microgroove structures' into a plastic substrate, similar to a "hologram" on a credit card. A single square meter has 500,000 microgroove structures, and these are coated with conductive materials and photo-active ink. Layers of encapsulation film keep the printed rolls stable and enhance their durability.

This is all carried out using what's called roll-to-roll processing, where you coat or emboss an entire length of a material that is fed continuously from one roller on to another. It's inexpensive and efficient. In addition, Power Roll is going with abundant perovskite as a key material in its solar cells to absorb sunlight and convert it into electricity.

The company has already been at this for a while and has loads of patents to prove it, so what's new?

Essentially, the team, in collaboration with researchers at the University of Sheffield, has devised a new microgroove structure with a back-contact format – with all the electrical contacts of the solar cell on the back rather than in front. This not only allows for more efficient energy generation, but also makes it cheaper and simpler to produce the solar cells.

The new design also increased the number of grooves in each component of the back-contact perovskite solar cell, from 16 to 362. That improved power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) by up to 12.8%.

A 4-square-inch sample of the film showing how energy-absorbing perovskite is coated on the plastic substrate

The group also used a Hard X-ray nanoprobe microscope to check the structure and composition of the solar cells for defects. The detailed images helped identify issues like empty spaces within the semiconductor material.

This back-contact design of the solar cell allows the perovskite to directly absorb the light without it first passing through a transparent conductive oxide (TCO) layer. That negates the need for TCOs incorporating rare and expensive materials like indium, and as such, brings down the cost of production.

The big deal about its product is that this solar film is awfully light and easy to apply. That means you can install it on all kinds of surfaces including non-loading bearing rooftops, transport it to remote areas that need accessible options for generating electricity, and hopefully, blanket many currently unproductive buildings and spaces with it so you've got many more sources of clean energy to supply the grid. Power Roll has a neat visualization of this optimistic vision in its promo video below.

With that, Power Roll is set to scale up manufacturing of its solar cells sharpish. The company and its collaborators at Sheffield have published these advancements in the production process in Applied Energy Materials. The team working on this will move on to explore the use of X-ray microscopy in better understanding how its film will operate and what sort of stability it will exhibit.

Last October, Power Roll raised US$5.4 million in a funding round to grow its fully operational manufacturing plant's production capacity. It's also expecting to produce enough of the solar film to generate 1 GW of electricity in the near future.

Source: Power Roll

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Flipboard
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
10 comments
SussexWolf
Sounds very impressive. If the film performs and lasts as promised, it could be a game changer, and could challenge China’s dominance in solar panel production.
Hon
any day now
Daishi
I have not seriously looked into solar in a while but there seems like a point where making panels cheaper doesn't really matter. One of the largest installers in CO that goes door to door selling panels stopped at my place and asked if they could give me a quote so I decided to entertain them for them to come back at about $6/watt installed (and it would also raise my homeowners insurance rates). Meanwhile I think the wholesale cost of good panels has now dropped below 25 cents/watt. I realize my quote was high and residential panels are just one use-case but my point is the cost of panels themselves is becoming a lot less important already. In a residential use-case you would need more of them so they would end up costing more.
TechGazer
No mention of how long they last.
moreover
Daishi has a point, but the actual cost to homeowners differs greatly, with the US being very high and Australia extremely low. In the US a big chunk is lead generation/acquition, and many installers work with lenders that charge a whopping 34% on the overall project cost. However, it may still pencil out in states with high electricity rates or where a switch to electricity shields you from fluctuating gas prices.
rgbatduke
Lots of information not clearly expressed in the video or text. It sounds like efficiency is "reasonable" -- 100+ W from 1 m^2 of film on a super-bright day when ground level insolation is around 1 kW/m^2 (likely somewhat less on all fronts). This is markedly lower than commercial silicon these days, but presumably the cost is MUCH lower as well. What's missing are two things. First, perovskite cells often have impressive efficiencies and are cheap to make, but the price they pay is that they just don't last for anything like the 20+ year expected service life of PV solar panels. I don't expect that making them into a film -- however robust -- will improve this, but we'll see. The article pointedly refrains from stating any sort of expected lifetime in service or referencing a curve of how production is expected to degrade over time or (for that matter) any idea of how you are going to get the film to stick reliably to all of the surfaces their video shows them coating or a common ordinary shingle roof or a house's siding material. Go outside and try to get plastic wrap to stick to anything at all in a way robust against a mild wind and accompanying rain. Then there is the problem of hooking the plastic film up to a collection wires etc ditto -- do they put a copper PCB patch on the corner or what? Ultimately, I expect that the film can only reasonably be deployed in the form of rigid panels. And there we're right back where we started -- mounting rigid panels OVER a shingle roof (or paying exorbitant prices for pre-filmed specialty roof shingles a la Tesla). Ditto for the sides of houses. I still have no idea how they might attach these panels (or the film direct) to the side of existing commercial buildings, be they built of brick, concrete, or glass.
Fixing these two problems (or explaining how they PLAN to fix them, or showing how longevity is NOT a problem and demonstrating a panel that has a clear positive amortized ROI over existing commercial silicon seems key to them actually getting rich, or getting me to buy stock in the company. I might take a risk on the stock, but I'd really like to have SOME reason to believe that it would pay off and not just be overtaken by falling costs in panels that are more efficient and last far longer.
paul314
This seems more like the kind of price that would let people incorporate panels into pretty much everything, because after shipping costs it's not much more expensive than regular plastics. Once we get there, it will be umbrellas and sunshades with solar collectors, cars, jackets, pool covers, pretty much anything that has a flattish surface that might get exposed to sunlight. Because if the cost is comparable, why not?
Aermaco
I can see but hope that when my rigid PV panels expire I can simply glue this future improved film over them and reconnect to existing circuits.
Techutante
@TechGazer "The team working on this will move on to explore the use of X-ray microscopy in better understanding how its film will operate and what sort of stability it will exhibit."
jimbo92107
I see two main advantages: You can hang these on any vertical wall, not relying on heavy, intrusive panels. Second, the lightweight film is bendable, so you can literally hang it over the top of a box. This means you can cover a van, a semi, even a shipping container/railroad car. Despite reduced efficiency, this enables a whole new game of gathering power cheaply, from every angle. It will be interesting to see the first people to use this stuff on houses and vehicles.